⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Robert J Williams”

Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2024-02-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ark. 7
Cite as 2024 Ark. 7 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-23-342 Opinion Delivered: February 8, 2024 ROBERT J. WILLIAMS, JR. APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ASHLEY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 02CR-20-212] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2024-02-08 · Published · cited 2× · 2024 Ark. 12
Cite as 2024 Ark. 12 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-23-342 Opinion Delivered: February 8, 2024 ROBERT J. WILLIAMS, JR. APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ASHLEY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 02CR-20-212] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003-04-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 4, 2003 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT J. WILLIAMS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henry County No. 13255 Julian P. Guinn, Judge No. W2002-02366-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 14, 2003 The defendant, Robert J. Williams, pled guilty in the Henry County Circuit Cou
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-08-10 · Published · cited 2× · 238 B.R. 475; 99 Daily Journal DAR 9777; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7623; 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1145; 34 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1219; 1999 WL 709982
238 B.R. 475 (1999) In re Theodore W. CONNOLLY, Debtor. Robert J. Williams, Inc., Appellant, v. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee, Appellee. BAP No. NC-99-1054-RRyMe. Bankruptcy No. 95-11748-AJ. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 23, 1999. Decided August 10, 1999.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-09-22 · Published · cited 0×
09/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 11, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JALEAN ROBERT WILLIAMS AND MARKEIL LINSKEY WILLIAMS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2017-A-296 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2023-06-08 · Published · cited 0×
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 8, 2023 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00013-CV KEITH MORRIS, RECEIVER OF THE LOUISE N. WHEAT TRUST, Appellant V. JAMES J. WILLIAMS AND THOMAS ROBERT WILLIAMS, Appellees On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
12/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 9, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JALEAN ROBERT WILLIAMS AND MARKEIL LINSKEY WILLIAMS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2016-B-1164 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge ___
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016-07-19 · Published · cited 67× · 225 N.J. 582; 139 A.3d 1174; 2016 N.J. LEXIS 697
Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal involves the application of Rule 7:7-7, the discovery rule in municipal court cases. Defendant Robert Stein was involved in a motor vehicle accident in Wayne Township and charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) and careless driving. In pretrial di
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-03-15 · Published · cited 0× · 97 N.E.3d 624
Barnes, Judge. Case Summary [1] James Cramer appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Robert Edwards, as personal representative of the Estate of Paul H. Cramer and Successor Trustee of the Paul H. Cramer Trust ("Edwards"). We affirm. Issue [2] Cramer raises two issue
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013-03-05 · Published · cited 72× · 2013 ME 24; 61 A.3d 718; 2013 WL 791830; 2013 Me. LEXIS 24
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2013 ME 24 Docket: Ken-11-454 Argued: September 13, 2012 Decided: March 5, 2013 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR, JJ. Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and LEVY, MEAD, and GORMAN, JJ. Dissent: ALEXANDER, SILVER, and JABAR, JJ. JOHN DOE I et al.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2015-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00174-CV ____________________ MICHAEL BOOTH, THOMAS ALLEN, ROBERT SPAAK, RANDY GLESSNER, COURTNEY WILLIAMS, VALERIA J. SPAAK, MARY ALLEN, ROBERT W. THOMAS SR., AND THERESA M. WILLIAMS, Appellants
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 241 So. 3d 91
Dismissed.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-08-19 · Published · cited 41× · 764 F.3d 1002; 2014 WL 4090545; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16061; 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,139; 124 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 127
OPINION PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs — Payne Care Center, Kingsley Home Care Center, and their named employees — appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The complaint alleges that Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ First Amendment right to freedom of religion by forcing them to provide direct staff support to a developmenta
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023-01-19 · Published · cited 0×
In Division JARED FORD and MARY WILLIAMS, ) ) Respondents, ) No. SD37271 ) v. ) Filed: January 19, 2023 ) ROBERT D. GIOVANELLI II, and ) KERITH A. GIO
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013-02-25 · Published · cited 64× · 710 F.3d 1189; 2013 WL 656500; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4187
WILSON, Circuit Judge: The City of Southfield Fire & Police Retirement System (“Southfield” or the “Investors”) appeals the dismissal of its consolidated class-action securities fraud complaint against the St. Joe Company (“St. Joe” or the “Company”) and St. Joe’s current and former officers for alleged violations of §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2021-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-21-00019-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JOHN BARNETT, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. THOMAS C. BRIGHT, JAMES § COUNTY COURT AT LAW MCANDREW, CHARLES DICKSON, J. LEONARD DECARLO, ROBERT CLAY WILLIAMS AND UROLOGY TYLER, P.A., APPEL
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-10-18 · Published · cited 61× · 839 F.3d 1312; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18717; 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,661; 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1105; 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 883
SMITH, District Judge: Christine J. Williams, the plaintiff below and appellant here, was employed for more than twenty-one years as the laboratory manager and chief medical technologist in the Health Department operated by the Poarch Band of Creek Indians (“the Poarch Band”), a federally-recognized tribe of Native Americans.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 28, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00056-CV JERRY J. MARKOVICH AND RAVI KUMARARATNE, Appellants V. ROBERT R. HARL, VAN A. VELCH, JOHN T. MCNABB, II, EDWARD J. DIPAOLO, MICHAEL C. LEBENS, DANIEL E. LONERGAN, ROBERT L. SLUDER, AND S. MILLER WILLIAMS, Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-02-22 · Published · cited 46× · 477 F.3d 974; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3795; 2007 WL 528180
*975 COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. A grand jury indicted Robert Lee Williams for possession with intent to distribute approximately 42 grams of a mixture or substance that contained cocaine base (crack), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). Williams moved to suppress evidence that was seized
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015-04-14 · Published · cited 18× · 467 S.W.3d 836; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 405
MARY W. SHEFFIELD, P.J.— OPINION AUTHOR Dave R. Williams (“Mr. Williams”) and his wife Candice J. Williams (“Mrs. Williams”) (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (“HSBC”). Appellants raise eleven points on appeal. We disagree with their arguments and affirm the trial court’s judgme