⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Robert F. Moody”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019-07-24 · Published · cited 15× · 931 F.3d 1136
Dyk, Circuit Judge. Vernon and Anita Moody sued the United States in the Court of Federal Claims ("Claims Court") alleging that the United States was a party to contracts with the Moodys and breached these contracts. 1 The Moodys also contended that they had implied-in-fact contracts with the United States, and that the United
District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014-07-14 · Published · cited 29× · 32 F. Supp. 3d 869; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95111; 2014 WL 3501051
OPINION ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge. This case is" brought by a homeowner against a mortgage servicer and its law firm for: violation of the Real Estate Settlement Practices Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e); violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962,1964; common law fraud; and for declaratory judgment. Defendants have filed independent M
State v. Moodypublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010-05-18 · Published · cited 7× · 994 A.2d 702; 121 Conn. App. 207; 2010 Conn. App. LEXIS 195
994 A.2d 702 (2010) 121 Conn.App. 207 STATE of Connecticut v. Michael MOODY. No. 30031. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued February 9, 2010. Decided May 18, 2010. *704 Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, with whom was Mirza Refai Arefin, certified legal intern, for
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-09-17 · Published · cited 100× · 768 F.3d 806
OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: A jury found Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) detectives Steven Moody and Robert Pulido liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violating Michael Walker’s constitutional rights by (1) acting with deliberate indifference to, or reckless disregard for, Walker’s rights or for the truth, in (2) withholding or concealing evidenc
Moody v. Nicholsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005-04-19 · Published · cited 0× · 128 F. App'x 152
ORDER Upon consideration of Robert E. Moody’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009-04-06 · Published · cited 22× · 564 F.3d 754; 79 Fed. R. Serv. 380; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7166; 2009 WL 904608
564 F.3d 754 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis MOODY, also known as Youngsta; Detroit Hines, also known as Li'l Nut; Derrick Woodard, Defendants-Appellants. No. 07-11222. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 6, 2009. *756 Renee Harris Toliver (argued), Fort Worth, TX, for U.S. An
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-05-02 · Published · cited 37× · 821 F.3d 973; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7876; 2016 WL 1729523
BENTON, Circuit Judge. A fire damaged Moody Station and Grocery, a convenience store owned by Sonya R. Hubbard. The store was leased tó Jeremy D. and Don McKee Jr., operating as “The Big Store.” The insurer, Federated Mutual Insurance Company, filed an interpleader suit to determine the rights of Moody Station, and The Big Store to insurance proceeds. Moody. Station says it is
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989-03-01 · Published · cited 35× · 864 F.2d 1178
PER CURIAM: In this, approximately his twenty-third section 1983 complaint filed in the last three years, Cordell Moody, a Texas Department of Corrections (“TDC”) prisoner proceeding informa pauperis (IFP), raises additional issues concerning the conditions of his confinement. 1 In his complaint, Moo
People v. Jassopublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2006-09-12 · Published · cited 15× · 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 697; 142 Cal. App. 4th 1213; 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8651; 2006 Daily Journal DAR 12350; 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1381
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1215 OPINION STATEMENT OF THE CASE A jury convicted defendant Jaime Mejia Jasso of three counts of conspiracy to transport a controlled substance into prison and two counts of transporting a controlled substance into prison. (Pen. Code, § 182</
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011-04-07 · Published · cited 1× · 804 F. Supp. 2d 1123; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38024
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. # 11. Defendant argues that the “claims made and reported” policy issued to the insured does not cover Plaintiffs claim because the claim was not reported to the insurer until after the policy h
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009-07-22 · Published · cited 5× · 976 A.2d 484; 601 Pa. 655; 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1328
OPINION Justice GREENSPAN. In this appeal, we hold that as long as the requirements of Section 1247(d) of the National Trails System Act are met, a railroad right-of-way is “railbanked” regardless of whether the rail operator agrees to resuscitate service. Accordingly, we affirm the Superior Court’s decision below. Railbanking is the preservation of an easement that was previous
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2018-11-08 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 16-1707 ROBERT W. MOODY, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided November 8, 2018) To
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991-11-04 · Published · cited 0× · 953 F.2d 648; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31620; 1991 WL 292769
953 F.2d 648 Moody (Robert)v.Deterding (Dwayne) NO. 91-3337 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Nov 04, 1991 1 Appeal From: D.Neb. 2 AFFIRMED.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D19-0249 _____________________________ ROBERT F. EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Bruce Anderson, Judge. June 18, 2019 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and W
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007-03-20 · Published · cited 13× · 506 F. Supp. 2d 823; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19883; 2007 WL 869693
506 F.Supp.2d 823 (2007) Kevin MOODY and Veronica Moody, individually and as parents and next friend of Tyler Moody, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. No. 03-CV-0784-CVE-PJC. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. March 20, 2007. *824 *825 Cl
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004-03-10 · Published · cited 77× · 360 F.3d 1306; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 4609; 2004 WL 433550
DYK, Circuit Judge. Appellant Robert E. Moody (“Moody”) appeals from the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirming the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ (“BVA”) denial of his claim for clear and unmistakable error (“CUE”) in a 1996 Department of Veterans’ Affairs (“VA”) regional office (“RO”) rating decision. Based on our recent decision in Szemraj v.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-02-23 · Published · cited 1× · 689 F. Supp. 2d 686; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15747
OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. This action raises solely state law claims of breach of fiduciary duties, gross mismanagement, abuse of control, unjust enrichment, and constructive fraud. It was initially filed in New York State Supreme Court and was removed to this Court by defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Plaintiffs have now moved to remand this action to state co
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 947 A.2d 708; 596 Pa. 575; 2008 Pa. LEXIS 504
ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are: 1.Did the Superior Court err as a matter of state and federal law, in reversing the trial judge’s finding that Conrail intended to abandon the line without railbanking, when: a.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-11-07 · Published · cited 0× · 153 F. App'x 788
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff-appellant Shelley Moody appeals from a November 8, 2004, judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Sandra L. Townes, Judge) granting summary judgment for defendants-appellees New York City Department of Corrections a
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022-09-19 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D22-0850 _____________________________ ROBERT F. POOLE, Appellant, v. RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. J. Layne Smith, Judge. September 19, 2022