⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Robert D. Johnson and Linda D. Johnson”

People v. Robert D.public domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004-01-30 · Published · cited 4× · 803 N.E.2d 1067; 345 Ill. App. 3d 769; 281 Ill. Dec. 446; 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 81
803 N.E.2d 1067 (2004) 345 Ill. App.3d 769 281 Ill.Dec. 446 In re ROBERT D., Alleged to be a Person Subject to Involuntary Admission (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert D., Respondent-Appellant). No. 2-03-0045. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. January 30, 2004.
Holliman v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016-01-27 · Published · cited 4× · 2016 Ark. App. 39; 480 S.W.3d 903; 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 49
ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge h Farris Holliman, Sheila Holliman, and Leon Holliman, individually and in his capacity as trustee of the Zoe Holliman Revocable Trust (Trust), appeal the Cleburne County Circuit Court’s December 2, 2014 order denying and dismissing their claims of undue influence and breach of fiduciary duty, among others, against appellees L
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2004-06-22 · Published · cited 2× · 153 S.W.3d 578; 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 5563
OPINION DON H. REAVIS, Justice. By this original proceeding, relators C.D. Morse and wife, Linda Morse, seek a writ of mandamus requesting that we order the Honorable Blair Cherry, District Judge of the 72nd Judicial District Court of Lubbock County, to vacate his order of May 3, 2004, in the underlying proceeding bearing cause number 2003-524,072, to th
Miller v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012-10-05 · Published · cited 136× · 295 Kan. 636; 289 P.3d 1098; 2012 WL 4773559; 2012 Kan. LEXIS 480
Johnson, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I wholeheartedly join with Justice Beier’s concurrence and dissent and fully embrace her well-reasoned legal analysis. I write separately only to share some of my observations about K.S.A. 60-19a02, viewed through the lens of practicality and common-sense, rather than constitutional jurisprudence. For simplicity, I will use the term “doctor”
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015-07-02 · Published · cited 32× · 468 S.W.3d 482; 2015 Tenn. LEXIS 548
OPINION CORNELIA A. CLARK, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SHARON G. LEE, C.J., and GARY R. WADE, JEFFREY S. BIVINS, and HOLLY KIRBY, JJ., joined. We granted this extraordinary appeal to determine whether, in this declaratory judgment action, the death-sentenced inmates’ claims chall
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-04-11 · Published · cited 70× · 749 F.3d 879
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;
Stacy v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010-01-07 · Published · cited 1× · 25 So. 3d 365
25 So.3d 365 (2009) Linda STACY, Individually and As Mother and Natural Guardian of Aleigha Triplett, a Minor, Appellant, v. William JOHNSON, M.D., Magnolia Regional Health Center, Alcorn County, Mississippi, by and Through Its Board of Supervisors; and City of Corinth, Appellees. NO. 2007-CA-02185-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. May 12, 2009. Rehearing D
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016-05-25 · Published · cited 9× · 416 S.C. 508; 788 S.E.2d 216; 2016 WL 3022394; 2016 S.C. LEXIS 123
*510ACTING JUSTICE TOAL: Linda Johnson asks this Court to review the court of appeals’ decision in Johnson v. Heritage Healthcare of Estill, Op. No. 2014-UP-318, 2014 WL 3845115 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Aug. 6, 2014), reversing the circuit court’s finding that Heritage Healthcare of Estill (HHE)1 waived its right to arbitrate the claims
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2017-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 233 So. 3d 265
MAXWELL, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Under our civil discover rules, a party who fails to attend his own properly noticed deposition may be sanctioned—up to dismissal of his case.1 Here, the plaintiff in a will contest intentionally skipped out on his deposition. This prompted the chancellor to grant the defendant’s motion for sanctions, dismissing the will contest. While
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014-12-17 · Published · cited 0× · 152 So. 3d 855; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20463; 2014 WL 7150490
PER CURIAM. We affirm the final declaratory judgment determining that the Florida Municipal Insurance Trust (“FMIT”) agreement with its member, City of Plantation, provided excess insurance and not primary insurance for automobile accidents. Thus, it was not required to include uninsured motorist protection as part of its provisions. See § 627.727(2), Fla. Stat (2011). The insurin
District Court, District of Columbia · 1996-10-28 · Published · cited 7× · 944 F. Supp. 5; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19765; 1996 WL 601575
MEMORANDUM ROBERTSON, District Judge. This case began as a simple action to collect a bill for medical services but now involves third party defendants and raises issues of jurisdiction and equity that are not so simple. The court that may have jurisdiction to get the bill paid appears to be the U.S. Claims Court, and for that reason the defendant’s third-party claim for insurance coverage will be tr
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-08-06 · Published · cited 8× · 475 B.R. 703
OPINION JURY, Bankruptcy Judge. Relying on § 541(b)(7)(A) 1 , above-median chapter 13 debtors, Barron and Linda Parks, calculated their disposable income by deducting voluntary postpetition 401(k) contributions in the amount of $318 per month from their monthly income. They then sought confirmation
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Ark. App. 469
Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 469 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-21-528 IN THE MATTER OF LINDA Opinion Delivered November 16, 2022 RUSHTON SELMAN, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON APPEAL FROM THE COLUMBIA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT FRANK D. SELMAN
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 15-0975 12/21/2015 7:10:33 PM tex-8333751 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, C
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Ark. App. 469
Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 469 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-21-528 IN THE MATTER OF LINDA Opinion Delivered November 16, 2022 RUSHTON SELMAN, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON APPEAL FROM THE COLUMBIA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT FRANK D. SELMAN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-09-13 · Published · cited 118× · 658 F.3d 954; 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1409; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18882; 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 358
658 F.3d 954 (2011) Bradley R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; Jeff Mangum, individually and in his official capacity as a Member of the Board of Education for the Poway Unified School District; Linda Vanderveen, individually and in her official capacity as a Member of the Board of Education for the Poway Unified School District; Andrew Patapow, individually and in his official capacity as a Member of the Board of E
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON ROBERT COX, Administrator of ) the Estate of Linda Cox Johnson, ) Deceased, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) Madison Law No. C-92-245 vs. ) ) GENERAL CARE CORP. d/b/a HCA )
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984-02-13 · Published · cited 57× · 724 F.2d 1498; 15 Fed. R. Serv. 33; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25533
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Robert D. Chilcote, challenges his conviction on charges of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, possession with intent to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C.A. § 2. Appellant also challenges his conviction, in a separate trial, on charges of assaulting
In Re Johnsonpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997-10-21 · Published · cited 9× · 213 B.R. 552; 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1668; 1997 WL 655292
213 B.R. 552 (1997) In re Daniel M. JOHNSON and Linda M. Johnson, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 97 B 09972. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 21, 1997. *553 Michael L. Sherman, Terri M. Long, Amy A. Aronson, Sherman & Sherman, Chicago, IL, for Movant. Robert J. Adams, Brian C. Pedersen, Robert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-03-24 · Published · cited 6× · 144 N.Y.S.3d 218; 192 A.D.3d 1019; 2021 NY Slip Op 01769
Matter of Arielle A. D. (Keith D.) (2021 NY Slip Op 01769) Matter of Arielle A. D. (Keith D.) 2021 NY Slip Op 01769 Decided on March 24, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporti