Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 22, 2016 Session JORGE A. ALFONSO, ET AL. v. LINDA V. BAILEY, EXECUTRIX AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT M. BAILEY, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 14-2-065 Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor No. E2015-02100-COA-R3-CV-FILED-AUGUST 9, 2016

NO. 12-21-00091-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS ROBERT HALLETT, M.D., § APPEAL FROM THE 159TH APPELLANT V. KAYWIN CARTER, M.D., DAVID BAILEY, M.D., RAVINDER § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT BACHIREDDY, M.D., AND MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CHI ST. LUKE'S HEALTH

318 F.Supp.2d 839 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert D. BAILEY, Defendant. No. C4-04-019. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Northwestern Division. May 25, 2004. James G. Wolff, Mohall, ND, for defendant. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE HOVLAND, Chief Judge. Before the Court is the D

338 S.W.3d 540 (2010) Arthur B. ROBERTS, et al. v. Robert BAILEY, et al. No. E2010-00899-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section, at Knoxville. Assigned on Briefs September 16, 2010. November 9, 2010. Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court March 9, 2011. Katherine M. Hamilton, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the ap

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (A.P. DKT. # 30) Jason D. Woodard, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”)(A.P. Dkt. #30), filed by Kendrick Sales, et al. (the “Creditors”) in the above-styled adversary proceeding against

Michael A. Fagone, United States Bankruptcy Judge Robert Bailey seeks a determination that the debt owed to him by Ronald Reed was not discharged in Mr. Reed's chapter 7 case. Mr. Bailey contends that the debt is excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and

KELLY, Judge. This is the second appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of the appellants/cross-appellees in an action against the appellees/cross-appellants for breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy, defamation, slander per se, tortious interference, and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA). The factual background underlying this litigation is fully set forth in Bailey v. St. Louis

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA _______________ FILED No. 17-0206 April 6, 2018 _______________ released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge. Elmer Lamar Bailey was with his cousin when the vehicle they were traveling in crossed the centerline of a highway, struck an embankment, and overturned. Bailey, who appeared to be the driver of the vehicle, was trapped in the car and seriously injured. After an ambulance took Bailey to the hospital, an investigating officer found a box containing drugs

442 B.R. 416 (2011) In re Gregory C. BAILEY & Kimberly I. Bailey, Debtors. Joseph W. Kegg, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Gregory C. Bailey, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-25979-BM. Adversary No. 10-2366-BM. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. February 14, 2011. *418 Robert R. Druzisky, for Joseph W. Kegg, Jr. J.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION June 2, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9:15 a.m. v No. 318479 Grand Trav

KELLY, Judge. This is the second appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of the appellants/cross-appellees in an action against the appellees/cross-appellants for breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy, defamation, slander per se, tortious interference, and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA). The factual background underlying this litigation is fully set forth in Bailey v. St. Louis

*104OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Thomas J. Bailey, admitted as Thomas Joseph Bailey, has submitted an affidavit dated August 13, 2012, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (see 22 NYCRR 691.9). Mr. Bailey was admitted to the bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judici

BROWN, Chief Judge. |! Purchasers of real property brought this action in redhibition and fraudu*1223lent/negligent misrepresentation against the seller and the seller’s real estate agent and broker. The seller, Laura DeLaCruz, had moved to Nevada and was served pursuant to Louisiana’s long arm statute. She did not answer the lawsuit or appear at trial. A prelimina

*104OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Thomas J. Bailey, admitted as Thomas Joseph Bailey, has submitted an affidavit dated August 13, 2012, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (see 22 NYCRR 691.9). Mr. Bailey was admitted to the bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judici

MEMORANDUM JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. On June 20, 2013,. the parties to this consolidated action convened a conference call with the Court, in which Abbe Lowell, Esq., sought leave to file a motion to be substituted for the New York Attorney General’s office as counsel for Governor George Pataki. By order dated June 28, 2013, the Court granted Governor Pataki’s motion for substitution of couns

CASANUEVA, Judge. The Appellants seek review óf a final judgment entered after a bench trial on their claims against the various Appellees for breach of fiduciary duty, defamátion, slander per se, violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), conspiracy, and tortious interference as to several individuals and entities. In this appeal, the Appellants

Bailey, Judge. Case Summary [1] Chris Hawkins ("Hawkins") appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, of Battery, as a Level 3 felony. 1 He raises four issues on appeal, but we address only the dispositive issue of whether the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to give Hawkins's proposed

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Robert Gene Bailey appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the records and

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Robert Gene Bailey appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the records and