Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON MAY 1999 SESSION FILED July 13, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

163 Cal.App.3d 148 (1984) 209 Cal. Rptr. 205 ERNESTINE GARCIA, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. G001611. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. December 24, 1984. *149 COUNSEL Michael G. Nutter fo

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED February 13, 1998 MAURICE KARR and ) MAURICE KARR, Trustee, ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiffs/Appellees, ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 95-2473-I VS. )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 15, 2013 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JEFFREY A. SIMMONS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Warren County No. F8245 Larry B. Stanley, Judge No. M2012-01374-CCA-R3-CD No. M2012-01223-CCA-R3-CD

952 A.2d 364 (2008) 180 Md. App. 639 Kelly GREEN, a Minor, etc., et al., v. N.B.S., INC., et al. No. 1258, September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. July 2, 2008. *366 Brian S. Brown (Saul E. Kerpelman & Associates, PA on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Elaine R. Wilford

Honorable J. Overby Smith Opinion No. W-1426 Chairman Industrial Accident Board Re: Under Section 6 of State ,InsuranceBuilding Article 8306 of Vernon's Austin, Texas Civil Statutes, should the first day which an injured employee is un- able to perform his regular task for

654 F.Supp. 1168 (1987) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. The STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, and the Mississippi Department of Wildlife Conservation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. J85-0669(B). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. February 27, 1987. *1169 Jerome C. Rose, Mildred Byrd, G. William

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BARBOUR, District Judge. The trial of this case was bifurcated so that the Court would hear the liability issues and later, if the Plaintiffs were successful, consider the issues of reinstatement and back pay. After hearing the evidence pertaining to the liability issues, the Court announced a decision for the Plaintiff but took the case under advisement for rendi

No petition for Certiorari was filed. These three actions for damages grew out of the same automobile accident, and although separate actions, they were, by agreement, tried together on the same testimony. The first action was brought by J.M. Whitson, Administrator for damages for the death of his minor daughter, Pansy Whitson. The second action was brought by Helen Henderson, by her next friend, for damages for personal injuries; and the third action was brough

ALLEN, J., concurred with Judge Baldwin in the opinion that the judgment should have been de bonis testatoris; and that the error was a clerical misprision which might have been corrected in the Court below: but thought that as the case was in this Court it might be corrected here. AHENDMENTS. I. Of Equity Pleading's. A. In General. 1. Of Bills.<

JOYNFS, J. This is an action of debt upon a single bill brought by William Churn against John H. Powell, Jackson B. Powell, George S. Powell and A. J. Ward. The bond, as written, purports to be the bond of John H. Powell as principal, and of the other parties and Robert W. Powell as securities. It was not executed by Robert W. Powell, a vacant space and seal being left for his name between those of Jackson B. Powell and George

JOYNFS, J. This is an action of debt upon a single bill brought by William Churn against John H. Powell, Jackson B. Powell, George S. Powell and A. J. Ward. The bond, as written, purports to be the bond of John H. Powell as principal, and of the other parties and Robert W. Powell as securities. It was not executed by Robert W. Powell, a vacant space and seal being left for his name between those of Jackson B. Powell and George

JOYNFS, J. This is an action of debt upon a single bill brought by William Churn against John H. Powell, Jackson B. Powell, George S. Powell and A. J. Ward. The bond, as written, purports to be the bond of John H. Powell as principal, and of the other parties and Robert W. Powell as securities. It was not executed by Robert W. Powell, a vacant space and seal being left for his name between those of Jackson B. Powell and George

DANIEL, J. The judgment upon which the decree sought to be reversed is founded, was rendered in the year 1802. No steps appear to have been taken to enforce the judgment until the institution of this suit in the year 1840. Thomas Smith the intestate of the appellant William P. Smith, in his answer to the bill, set up two defences, to wit, the statute of limitations, and the presumption of satisfaction arising