Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Tom, J. The issue presented on this appeal concerns whether the IAS Court properly denied defendant’s motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff’s punitive damages claim in light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Mastrobuono v Shearson Lehman Hutton (514 US —, 115 S Ct 1212). Plaintiff Joseph M. Mulder (Mulder) has been a member of the Se

417 F.Supp.2d 974 (2006) David E. ROGERS, on behalf of Himself and a Class of Persons Similarly Situated, and on behalf of the Baxter International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Incentive Investment Plan and the Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Plan, Plaintiff, v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., the Administrative Committee, the Investment Committee, Brian P. Anderson, John J. Greisch, Harry M. Jansen Kraemer, Jr., Robert P

361 N.W.2d 572 (1985) 219 Neb. 241 Raymond L. MULDER, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Doing Business As 3M Company, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 84-201. Supreme Court of Nebraska. February 8, 1985. *573 Robert F. Martin, Blair, for appellant. Tim J

OPINION ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice. Appellant Timothy B. Allen asks us to decide whether contracts he signed while he worked as a sales associate for respondent Burnet Realty LLC were contracts of insurance as a matter of Minnesota law. Under the contracts, Allen and Burnet Re*155alty agreed to an allocation of expenses should a dispute arise rela

379 N.W.2d 567 (1985) EASTERN AVIATION AND MARINE UNDERWRITERS, INC., Respondent, v. Nancy GILBERTSON, et al., Dr. Richard Mulder, et al., Appellants. Nos. C9-85-1523, C0-85-1619. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 24, 1985. *568 Robert G. Haugen, Marshall, for respondent. William M. Fishman, Bruce E. Goldstein, Minne

710 F.Supp.2d 722 (2010) David E. ROGERS, on behalf of Himself and a Class of Persons Similarly Situated, and on behalf of the Baxter International Inc. and Subsidiaries Incentive Investment Plan, Plaintiff, v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., the Administrative Committee, the Investment Committee, Brian P. Anderson, and Harry M. Jansen Kraemer, Jr., Defendants. No. 04 C 6476. United States District Court, N

815 F.Supp. 1054 (1992) Barbara J. TREGONING, Joe W. Hutchins, Joann Hartlerode, and Ripley Lance Petersen, Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN COMMUNITY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Michigan Corporation, Intracorp, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Industrial Insurance Services, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, Defendants. No. 1:91-CV-605. United States Dist

109 Mich. App. 394 (1981) 311 N.W.2d 364 ELLIS v. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. Docket No. 51975. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 10, 1981. Cholette, Perkins & Buchanan (by Bruce M. Bieneman and Robert J. Riley), for plaintiff. Varnum, Riddering, Wierengo & Christenson (by Thom

BISSELL, Circuit Judge. DECISION The decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), Appeal No. 665-18 (June 30, 1988), affirming the examiner’s final rejection of claims 48-51 in the patent application, Serial No. 423,-348, of Jacques Gosteli, Ivan Ernest and Robert B. Woodward [herei

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC, 'received an unsolicited fax from MedTox Laboratories, Inc. Sandusky brought a class' action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The district court denied class certification, finding the class not ascertainable. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court reverses and remands. :

370 N.E.2d 575 (1977) 54 Ill. App.3d 1053 12 Ill.Dec. 771 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen BELLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 76-226. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. November 21, 1977. *576 Ralph Ruebner, Deputy State App. Defender, Mich

ORDER Patrick J. Schütz, United States District' Judge Defendants MedTox Scientific, Inc. and MedTox Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, “MedTox”) faxed an unsolicited advertisement to plaintiff Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC (“Sandusky”). In- response, San-dusky filed this putative class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. Sandusky now moves to certify a class of 3,

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. This is a difficult tax case made more so by the refusal of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue -to engage the taxpayer’s arguments or the tax court’s decision. Kerry Adolphson, who has failed to file a tax return since at least 2002, challenges levies used by the IRS to collect his unpaid taxes. The tax court dismissed his petition for lack of subject-

*527 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Hasbro, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37). This case concerns Plaintiff MiTile Ltd.’s allegation that Scrabble Flash, Boggle Flash, Yahtzee Flash, and Simon Flash (collectively “the Flash Products”) infringe U.S. Paten

BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge. Terry A. Garvin, et al., (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT & T) on their claims to recover termination allowances brought pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). Facts Appellant

462 F.3d 55 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Fred SNOW, Marcus Snow, Rahad Ross, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 05-0958-CR(L). Docket No. 05-1850-CR-(CON). Docket No. 05-2208(CON). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: February 6, 2006. Decided: September 1, 2006.

ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge. Before the Court is Union Pacific Railroad Company’s (“Defendant” or “UP”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”), filed June 10, 2013. Clerk’s No. 21. Thomas W. Ray (“Plaintiff’ or “Ray”) filed a resistance to the Motion on July 12, 2013. Clerk’s No. 26. Defendant replied on July 22, 2013. Clerk’s No. 27. The matter is fully submitted.1

199 Wis.2d 714 (1996) 546 N.W.2d 140 STATE of Wisconsin EX REL. Tommy G. THOMPSON, Governor, State of Wisconsin, Petitioner, John T. BENSON, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction and James E. Doyle, Attorney General, Necessary-Parties, Marquelle MILLER, Cynthia Miller, Angela Gray, Zachery Gray, Shon Richardson, George Richardson, Latrisha Henry, Faye Henry, Reigne Barrett,

JUSTICE KARMEIER, specially concurring: I agree that the judgment of the circuit court should be reversed. In my view, however, that conclusion is not dependent on the applicability of section 10b(l) of the Consumer Fraud Act (815 ILCS 505/10b(l) (West 2000)). Plaintiffs’ consumer fraud claim is fatally infirm for an addition

131 Wis.2d 550 (1986) 388 N.W.2d 655 PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION OF MADISON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bruce A. JACOBSON, Dawn L. Jacobson, his wife, Harriet Gretebeck, and Whispering Pine Farm, Inc., Defendants, BANK OF DEERFIELD and Deerfield Farmers Cooperative, Defendants-Appellants. No. 84-1850. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on brief