Cases

NUMBER 13-00-645-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI __________________________________________________________________ MAURICE ROBBINS, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES M. ROBBINS , Appellant, v. RELIANCE IN

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Now before the Court are cross-motions for partial summary judgment seeking to resolve Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) claims in this environmental and administrative law case. ECF Nos. 34 (“Mot.”), 39 (“Opp’n & Cross-Mot.”). Plaintiffs ar

102 S.W.3d 739 (2001) Maurice ROBBINS, as Executor of the Estate of Charles M. Robbins, Appellant, v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY and Schneider National Carriers, Inc., Appellees. No. 13-00-645-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. November 1, 2001. *742 Brent Clark Perry, Patrick Zummo, Zummo, Mitchell & Per

OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: In its Amended Complaint, ECF No. 29, Plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) asks the court to void or, in the alternative, to discharge certain bonds securing duties on entries of frozen cooked crawfish tailmeat from the People’s Republic of China (“China”). Defendant U.S. Customs and Border Prote

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge. This case arises out of a construction loan that Lincoln National Life Insurance Company made to Sunset Village Limited Partnership for construction at Sunset Village’s mobile home community. The proceeds of the Loan were put on deposit with TCF National Bank, Sunset Village’s banker. TCF administered the draws against the proceed

742 F.Supp.2d 591 (2010) Arif ATIYEH, trading as WOW Outlet, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD; and CNA, Defendants.[1] Civil Action No. 07-cv-04798. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 27, 2010. *593 John P. Karoly, III, Esquire, for Plaintiff. Michael F. Henry, Es

723 F.Supp.2d 1247 (2010) SOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE and Friends of the River, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. S-06-2845 LKK/JFM. United States District Court, E.D. California. July 8, 2010. *1250 Brian Orion, Christopher Alan Sproul, Environmental Advocates, San Francisco, CA,

796 So.2d 896 (2001) Mattie F. COMPTON v. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., et al. No. 01-386. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. October 3, 2001. *897 Paul B. Wilkins, W. Mark McKee, Columbia, LA, Counsel for Mattie F. Compton. Thomas J. Smith, Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, New Orleans,

WIENER, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we are called on to address one of the recurring questions encountered in hurricane-related property insurance disputes that are governed by Louisiana law: When the insured and the insurer agree that both a covered risk and a non-covered or excluded risk caused some of the damage incurred by the insured property, which party must bear the b

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ No. 10-0096 ════════════ <

BURROUGHS, District Judge. Plaintiff Ace American Insurance Co. ("Ace"), as subrogee of Eric Slifka, initiated this action against Oyster Harbors Marine, Inc. ("Oyster Harbors") concerning a vessel that was sold by Oyster Harbors to Slifka and later sustained fire damage. Additional parties have since joined the case, including the vessel's manufacturer, Regulator Marine, Inc. ("Regulator"), the distributor and installer of the vess

CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER ADJUDICATING MOTIONS IN LI-MINE AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESSES AND ESTABLISHING NEW CASE MANAGEMENT DATES DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. The Court files this corrected version of its opinion and order originally filed on October 19, 2012 to correct non-substantive errors found in the original. Presently before the Court are several moti

SUTTON, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BERTELSMAN, D.J., joined. ROGERS, J. (pp. 421-25), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. There is a little more to this dispute than the topic (attorney’s fees) and the amount at stake (less than $15,000) would suggest. Larry Day says that the Benefits Review Board err

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0108p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner, - LARRY D. DAY,

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge. This case arises out of the devastating tragedy that occurred at the World Trade Center (“WTC”) in lower Manhattan, New York, on the morning of September 11, 2001. At issue in this case is the amount of insurance that is recoverable for the total destruction of the WTC that occurred after the buildings were struck by two fuel-laden aircraft that had been hijacked by terrorists. The appellants

467 F.Supp.2d 1071 (2006) In re NATIONAL WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE DEFERRED ANNUITIES LITIGATION No. 05CV1018JM(LSP). United States District Court, S.D. California. December 7, 2006. *1072 *1073 *1074 Andrew S. Friedman, Elaine Ryan, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman and Bal

559 F.Supp. 883 (1982) SOUTHEAST NURSING HOME, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff, v. The ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 79-AR-0808-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, S.D. December 29, 1982. *884 James E. Clark, London, Yancey, Clark & Allen, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff.

*311TOCI, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes that, because the legislature has not defined the term “offer” in the statute, the statute is ambiguous. Building on this proposition, the majority applies the rules of statutory construction and writes into section 20-259.01 a provision that an insurer explain the nature of under

Appellate Case: 25-1078 Document: 83-1 Date Filed: 07/20/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 20, 2026

510 N.W.2d 399 (1993) Leslie F. CLAUSEN, Appellant, v. COLUMBIA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A Corporation, Appellee. No. A-91-761. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. May 11, 1993. *400 Patrick W. Healey, of The Healey Wieland Law Firm, Lincoln, for appellant. Dallas D. Jones, of Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, Grimit & Witt, Lincol