Cases

In re Robbins, Johnny W.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 109-698. Denied. The matter presented to the court, as it relates to the police report and the scientific analysis report, is moot. Upon receipt of relator’s complaint that documents he received were incomplete, the district court clerk’s office again sent the reports in question, and Angola ma

In re Robbins, Johnny W.; applying for remedial and supervisory' writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 109-698. Granted in part; otherwise denied. The district court is ordered to notify relator of the cost of obtaining the documents listed in the writ application.

In re Johnny W. Robbins, applying for writ of mandamus to the First Judicial District Court, No. 109698, Parish of Cad-do. Denied. DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.

IRVING, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Edwina Robbins appeals the judgment of the Perry. County Circuit Court adjudicating her guilty of robbery. She argues that the trial court erred by admitting a witness’s testimony. In addition, she argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, or alternatively, the

635 S.E.2d 610 (2006) JAMES E. ROBBINS, THOMAS M. ROBBINS, ROBBINS INVFOR LTD., ROBBINS INVESTMENTS, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. LEO INGHAM, VICTOR GAMBLE, PAUL LONGHURST, TRINITY COURT MANAGEMENT, LTD., Defendants. No. COA05-1567 North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed October 17, 2006 Vann Law Firm, P.A., by Christopher M. Vann, for plaintiff appellants, cross-appellees.

Lanzinger, J., dissenting. {¶ 53} I respectfully dissent. The exclusion within the insurance contract plainly states that there will be no coverage for “bodily injury or property damage: * * * e. Arising out of a premises: (1) Owned by an insured * * * that is not an insured location.” By modifying the phrase to read “arising] from the quality or condition o

Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 90-CA-00536-SCT HUNTER L. ROUSSEL, JR. v. JOHN ROBBINS, II DATE OF JUDGMENT: 9/27/90 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ALFRED G. NICOLS COURT FROM WHICH RANKIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPEALED: ATTORNEYS FOR THOMAS W. CROCKETT, JR. APPELLANT: RICKY G. LUKE ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: JOHN M. ROACH NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL

Andree LAYTON ROAF, Judge. In this adverse-possession case, Lark and Adelma Hunter appeal from a Pulaski County Chancery Court order granting summary judgment in favor of Vernon L. Robertson, an owner of adjacent land on Kanis Road in Little Rock. The Hunters had sought to be declared the owners of a three-tenths of an acre tract of unimproved land (hereinafter the “disputed tract”) that was e

Terry Crabtree, Judge. Appellant James Hunter was convicted by a jury of driving while intoxicated, possession of a controlled substance, and resisting arrest. He was thereafter sentenced to a total of three years in the Mississippi County Detention Center. Appellant now appeals, raising three points for reversal. We affirm. The events that led to appellant’s con

566 S.E.2d 139 (2002) W. Glen ROBBINS, Jr., Husband and Executor of the Estate of Gayle C. Robbins, Deceased Employee, Plaintiff, v. WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Employer, Self Insured, Defendant. No. COA01-1224. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 16, 2002. *140 Wallace and Graham, P.A., by Richard L. Huffman, Salisbury,

[Cite as State v. Robbins, 2017-Ohio-8497.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 27100 : v.

Judge GREENE concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority that the failure of the trial court to define “rape” for the jury was error. However, contrary to *82the majority, I believe the instructional error did have “a probable impact on the jury’s finding of guilt.” See State v. Odom, 30

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 23-16147 ANTHONY T. DEFRANCESCO, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 4:20-cv-00011- CKJ v. ROBERT C. ROBBINS, in his OPINION individual capacity; MICHAEL D. DAKE, in his individ

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. Hunter Country Club, Inc. (Hunter) is appealing the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in this copyright infringement lawsuit. The plaintiffs are the individual owners of the copyrights at issue in this case 1 and brought this lawsuit in that capacity.

03/30/2021 DA 20-0145 Case Number: DA 20-0145 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2021 MT 75 PUBLIC LAND/WATER ACCESS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MARK L. ROBBINS and DEANNA M. ROBBINS; RO

398 B.R. 442 (2008) In re Gary L. ROBBINS, Debtors. Brian Ullom, On Traxx Solutions, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Gary L. Robbins, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-32181. Adversary No. 08-3107. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky. December 3, 2008. *443 Cathy S. Pike, Weber & Rose, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiffs. Simo

875 P.2d 1170 (1994) Lynn ROBBINS, Donna Johnston and Johnny Randall McDonald, as Co-Executors and Personal Representatives of the Estate of the late Martha McDonald Holder, on behalf of her estate and as Personal Representatives of Johnny Rufus McDonald, deceased; Lynn Robbins, an individual, Donna Johnston, an individual, Johnny Randall McDonald, an individual, and Jean Payne, an individual, Appellants, v. CITY OF DEL CITY, a municipal corporat

Justice Meyer concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the majority opinion except as to that part entitled “II. Sentencing Phase,” which holds that defendant is entitled to a new sentencing hearing because the kidnapping judgment has been arrested. I believe that portion of the majority opinion to be in error, and I would vote to affirm the judgment of the trial