Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 15‐1818 PANTHER BRANDS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. INDY RACING LEAGUE, LLC, doing business as INDYCAR, et al., Defendants‐Appell

WOOD, Chief Judge. This case arises from the world of auto racing and the sponsorships that go along with it, but it is in the wrong court. Panther Brands is a marketing and brand management company. In 2013, Panther signed a contract with IndyCar, which authorizes the Indy Racing League car series, to purchase various marketing benefits to provide to its team sponsor. The benefits included access to coveted space in the “Fa

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JACKIE SALDANA; CELIA SALDANA; No. 20-56194 RICARDO SALDANA, JR.; MARIA SALDANA, as individuals and as D.C. No. successors and heirs to Ricardo 2:20-cv-05631- Saldana, deceased, FMO-MAA Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION GLENHAVEN HEALTHCARE LLC, a California corporation; CARAVAN OPERA

ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT [ECF No. 35] Hon. Gonzalo P, Curiel, United States District Judge Before the Court is parties’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. ECF No. 35. The Settlement provides for: $20 e-gift certificates for the plaintiff class; $250,000 in cy pres awards; and up to $175,000.00 in plaintiffs attorney’s fe

Order Granting Motion to Remand and Denying Motion to Dismiss as Moot [ECF Nos. 6, 9, 40, 43] Jennifer A. Dorsey, United States District Judge Former Allegiant Air Captain Jason Kinzer sues Allegiant Air, LLC and Allegi-ant Travel Co. (collectively, “Allegiant”) for wrongful discharge, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, all stemming from his 2015 termination

(ECF No. 62 at 2-4 (citations as in original; footnote omitted).) III. LEGAL STANDARDS A. Review Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) When a magistrate judge issues a recommendation on a dispositive matter, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3) requires that the district judge "determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's [recommendation] that has

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Lawrence J. O’Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE L INTRODUCTION Currently pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Donnie Cummings, Christopher *1102Jones, and Charles Beaty (“Plaintiffs”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Defendant Cenergy International Services, LLC (“Cenergy

OPINION and ORDER Gordon, Judge: This action involves the sixth administrative review conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of the antidumping duty order covering steel wire garment hangers from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). See Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the PRC, 80 Fed. Reg. 69,9

PETTIGREW, J. laThis suspensive appeal by defendant, The Dow Chemical Company (Dow), presents two assignments of error challenging the trial court’s final judgment in this groundwater contamination case. Plaintiffs, through representatives Troy Robichaux and Marva Fefee, answered Dow’s appeal and then lodged a devolutive appeal of their own. Plaintiffs’ appeal raises thirty-one assignments of error attacking the same judgmen

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1818 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. SHELL OIL PRODUCTS CO., L.L.C.; CHEVRON CORP.; CHEVRON USA, INC.; EXXONMOBIL CORP.; BP, PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; ROYAL DUTCH SHELL P.L.C.; MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, L.L.C.; CITGO PETROLEUM CORP.; CONOCOPHILLIPS; CONOCOPHILLIPS CO.; PHIL

800 F.Supp.2d 991 (2011) BROWNMARK FILMS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. COMEDY PARTNERS, MTV Networks, Paramount Home Entertainment, Inc, South Park Digital Studios LLC, and Viacom International, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 10-CV-1013. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 6, 2011. *993 Garet K. Galster, Joseph A. Kromholz, Ryan

PATRICIA RIVET MURRAY, Judge. |, This is a suit arising out of an agreement to purchase property. The buyer, Kenneth Saavedra, brought this suit against the seller, Jerry Wallace, and seven other defendants. In response, Mr. Wallace and five of the other defendants (hereinafter referred to as the “Wallace Defendants”)1 filed exceptions of prematurity and lack of subject m

DENNIS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Energy Management Services, L.L.C. (“EMS”) appeals the district court’s order denying EMS’s motion to remand its suit against the City of Alexandria, Louisiana (“the City”) to the state court from which it was removed. Because the district court does not have jurisdiction over EMS’s suit, we REVERSE the district court’s order and REMAND

362 F.Supp.2d 1170 (2005) Catherine COUGHLIN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED VAN LINES, LLC, and DOES 1-50, Defendants. No. CV 0410576 R (MANX). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 7, 2005. *1171 Bruce N. Graham, Graham and Associates, Calabasas, CA, for Plaintiff. Gregg S. Garfinkel, Stone Rosenblatt Cha, Encino, C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE WASHINGTON CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-0265 (JDB) RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES COMPANY, LLC, and CHARLES E. KEEGAN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Washington Consulting Group ("plaintiff") brought this suit against Rayt

280 F.Supp.2d 867 (2003) Cynthia MORICONI, Individually and on behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. AT & T WIRELESS PCS, LLC d/b/a AT & T Wireless, Defendant. No. 4:03-CV-00344 GTE. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. August 19, 2003. *868 Brian G. Brooks, Susan Nichols, Brian

ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM

375 F.3d 831 People of the State of CALIFORNIA, ex rel; Bill LOCKYER, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.DYNEGY, INC.; Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.; NRG Energy, Inc.; Xcel Energy, Inc.; West Coast Power LLC; Cabrillo Power I LLC; Cabrillo Power II LLC; El Segundo Power LLC; Long Beach Generation LLC, Defendants-Appellees.People of the State of California, ex rel Bill Lockyer, Attorney

Vacated and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge *438 WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge TRAXLER joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge. The phrase “complete preemption” has become a term of art. It refers t

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-1347 INDUSTRIA LECHERA DE PUERTO RICO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAMÓN GONZÁLEZ BEIRÓ in his official capacity as ACTING SECRETARY OF THE PUERTO RICO DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE;* JORGE CAMPOS MERCED, in his official capacity as ADMINISTRATOR OF THE PUERTO RICO MILK INDUSTRY REGULATORY OFFICE