Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JING ZHOU, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2650 (TJK) KRISTI NOEM, Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Through a program known as EB-5, Congress chose to allot visas to foreign citizens who i

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1705 STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Appellant, SHARAN COLEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; JAMES C. FO

MAJORITY OPINION MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice. These consolidated cross-appeals stem from the breakup of a closely-held corporation. Appellants Nicholas White, Mark Moersen, Taurus Manufacturing Company, and Optimas Manufacturing Solutions, Inc. appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding damages to appellees Zhou Pei and Shaun White. In their first two issues, appellants challenge the legal and factu

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JANCO FS 2, LLC AND JANCO FS 3, ) LLC, ) ) C.A. No. N23C-03-005 MAA CCLD Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) ISS FACILITY SERVICES, INC.; ISS ) C&S BUILDING MAINTENANCE ) CORPORATION; ISS TMC ) SERVICES, INC.; and ISS FAC

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, Chief Judge. In this action alleging overtime pay and minimum wage violations and retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., defendants move to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, and one defendant moves under Rule 12(e) for a more

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 20-3584, 21-1028, and 21-1029 _____________ MALLET AND COMPANY INC. v. ADA LACAYO; RUSSELL T. BUNDY ASSOCIATES, INC. d/b/a Bundy Baking Solutions; SYNOVA LLC; WILLIAM CHICK BOWERS Russell T. Bundy Associates, Inc. d/b/a Bundy Baking Solutions; Synova LL

Filed: March 9, 2011 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1259 (5:07-cv-00028-gec) EQUITY IN ATHLETICS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; ARNE DUNCAN, Secretary of Education, in his official and individual capacity; SANDRA BATTLE, Acting Assistant Secretary for Civi

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DAVIS wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge WYNN joined. OPINION DAVIS, Circuit Judge: More than thirty years after Congress enacted a mandate for equal opportunity between the sexes in college athletics, this case reminds us that the realization of that congressional goal continues

504 F.Supp.2d 88 (2007) EQUITY IN ATHLETICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:07CV00028. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Harrisonburg Division. August 21, 2007. *89 *90 Douglas Gene Schneebeck, Modrall Sperling Roehl Harris &

36 F.Supp.2d 810 (1998) ROTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. MITSUBISHI CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of Japan; Mitsubishi International Corporation, a New York corporation; Tucker Associates, Inc., an Oregon corporation; and Garry Tucker, an individual, Defendants. No. 97-CV-2024. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Danville/Urbana Division.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA. Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN. GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. DECISION Rotee Industries, Inc. (“Rotee”) appeals the December 14, 1998 order of the United States District Court for Central District of Illinois granting summary judgment to Mitsubishi Corporation, Tucker Associates, Inc., Garry T

ACCEPTED 14-14-00384-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/26/2015 8:35:53 PM

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 6, 2020 Decided March 27, 2020 No. 19-1030 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON , PETITIONER v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON AND KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1192 PREMCA EXTRA INCOME FUND LP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Appellant, DYLAN DAS, Plaintiff, v. COLIN M. ANGLE; JULIE ZEILER, Defendants, Appellees, IROBOT CORPORATIO

Opinion issued January 18, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00288-CV ——————————— KEVIN BURKE, JEFFREY SCHWARTZ BURKE, TRACY RUTH BURKE, LUCKY BURKE, CINDY BERNAT, PAM BURKE DAILY, BARBARA BURKE HARGERG, LORI ILENE QUINTA VALLE,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 12-889L and No. 13-404L (Consolidated) (Filed: March 8, 2017) (As Amended upon Reconsideration: May 10, 2017) ) CLAUDE SEARS, et al., ) Post-trial determination of the just ) compensation due in a rails-to-trails case;

OPINION LEANNE JOHNSON, Justice Appellants Michael Booth, Thomas Allen, Robert Spaak, Randy Glessner, Courtney Williams, Valerie J. Spaak, Mary Allen, Robert W. Thomas Sr., and Theresa M. Williams (collectively Appellants) filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of Appellants’ special appearances. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(7) (West 2015). We reverse

Post-trial determination of the just compensation due in a rails-to-trails case; value of the agricultural land taken for trail use; cost to reclaim; severance damages attributable to “point rows;” no preemption of Iowa statute guaranteeing access to fields otherwise landlocked by the trail OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. This post-tr

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART (Dkt. 311) Geraldine Mund, United States Bankruptcy Judge Defendants SunCal Management, LLC (“SCM”) and Argent Management, Inc. (“Argent” and, with SCM, the “Defendants”) brought a motion for summary judgment (dkt. 311; the “MSJ”) on the first claim for relief (Breac

DON R. WILLETT, Circuit Judge: *468 Under Aetna's insurance plans, patients are responsible for a portion of their bills. That is not to say insurance companies are off the hook: They cover the remainder. But how much is Aetna obligated to pay for medical services provided to its members by