⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “River City Bank v. Shirk”

Utah Supreme Court · 2010-05-14 · Published · cited 39× · 2010 UT 40; 238 P.3d 1035; 656 Utah Adv. Rep. 5; 2010 Utah LEXIS 74; 2010 WL 1929423
*1036NEHRING, Justice: INTRODUCTION T 1 This case presents us with the question of what a party must do to "appear" under rule 5(a)(2)(B) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. We hold that the court of appeals correctly determined that a rule 5(a)(2)(B) appearance requires a party to make a formal presentation or submission to the trial court. Because
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-06-29 · Published · cited 18× · 328 F. Supp. 3d 141
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, Senior United States District Judge: Ambac Assurance Corporation ("Ambac") filed this action to recover damages arising from U.S. Bank National Association's ("U.S. Bank") alleged failure to satisfy its contractual and fiduciary duties as trustee for five residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") trusts insured that Ambac insured. U.S. Bank moves to stay this action under the Colorado River doct
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 787 F. Supp. 2d 867; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41430; 2011 WL 1457125
787 F.Supp.2d 867 (2011) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee, Plaintiff, v. SOKAOGON CHIPPEWA COMMUNITY (Mole Lake Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians) and Sokaogon Gaming Enterprise Corporation, Defendants. Case No. 10-C-1039. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. April 15, 2011. *869 Colleen E. Fielkow, Patrick J.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-05-21 · Published · cited 1× · 473 B.R. 612
MEMORANDUM OPINION JEFFERY A. DELLER, Bankruptcy Judge. The primary matter before the Court is Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s *617Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (the “Motion to Dismiss”), seeking dismissal of all but two Counts asserted in the adversary complaint filed on December 24, 2010 (the
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1983-06-02 · Published · cited 29× · 566 F. Supp. 134; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16536
566 F.Supp. 134 (1983) PROFESSIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PENN SQUARE BANK, N.A., now known as Deposit Insurance National Bank of Oklahoma City; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, receiver; First Penn Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation; Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., a partnership; James Blanton; Dean York; Bill P. Jennings; Frank L. Murphy; Eldon L. Beller; Bill G. Patterson; Richard T. Dunn; J
District Court, C.D. California · 1985-03-20 · Published · cited 22× · 605 F. Supp. 1425
605 F.Supp. 1425 (1985) COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES, an Indian tribe; Sierra Club, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. John O. MARSH, Jr., Secretary of the Army; Lieutenant J.K. Bratton, Chief of Engineers, Corps of Engineers, United States Army; Colonel Paul W. Taylor, District Engineer, Los Angeles District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers; James Watt, Secretary of the Department of the Interior; Robert F. Burford, Director of
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2011-08-24 · Published · cited 0× · 813 F. Supp. 2d 277; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95052; 2011 WL 3740478
813 F.Supp.2d 277 (2011) The PROBATE COURT OF the CITY OF WARWICK, by and through Judith A. LAWTON, Joan Grant, Carol Lincoln, Janice Leffingwell, Joyce Hendricks, John Kiepler as executor of the Estate of Beverly Kiepler, Janis Fisher, David Gilmore and Raymond P. Cyr, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. as co-executor of the Estate of Magda Burt, Defendant. CA. No. 07-239 S. United States Distr
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002-11-08 · Published · cited 1× · 285 F.3d 1078
REVISED NOVEMBER 8, 2002 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 00-60256 _____________________ PETER CLAYTON MCCLENDON Plaintiff-Appellant v. CITY OF COLUMBIA; ET AL Defendants CI
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002-09-05 · Published · cited 573× · 305 F.3d 314; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18318; 2002 WL 2027329
305 F.3d 314 Peter Clayton McCLENDON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF COLUMBIA; et al., Defendants,City of Columbia; James R. Carney, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-60256. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. September 5, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Kathryn Nea
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-12-02 · Published · cited 27× · 401 F. Supp. 2d 244; 17 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 721; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30363; 2005 WL 3244336
401 F.Supp.2d 244 (2005) The CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. BERETTA U.S.A. CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 00 CV 3641. United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 2, 2005. *245 *246 *247 *248 Corporation Counse
District Court, E.D. New York · 2004-04-12 · Published · cited 17× · 315 F. Supp. 2d 256; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6058; 2004 WL 764959
315 F.Supp.2d 256 (2004) CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. BERETTA U.S.A. CORP.; Browning Arms Co.; Charco 2000, Inc.; Colt's Manufacturing Co., Inc.; Forjas Taurus, S.A.; Glock Inc.; Glock GmbH; Phoenix Arms; Sigarms, Inc.; Sig Arms Sauer GmbH f/k/a J.P. Sauer & Sohn Inc.; Smith & Wesson Corp.; Sturm, Ruger and Co., Inc.; Tanfoglio Fratelli S.R.L.; Taurus International Mfg, Inc.; Acusport Corp; Alamo Leather Goods, Inc.; Bangers, L.P.; Bil
Shirk v. Lingemanpublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1901-03-05 · Published · cited 0× · 26 Ind. App. 630; 59 N.E. 941; 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 319
Robinson, J. Appellee filed a claim against the estate of appellant's decedent for damages for the breach of a contract for the exchange of lands. Appellant answered in denial. Trial by jury, verdict in appellee's favor, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered on the verdict for $19,304.10. The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the complaint or claim, and the denial of a new trial. Each of the four par
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00716-CV 4954793 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990-09-14 · Published · cited 87× · 906 F.2d 1068
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals by defendant The City of Houston (the City) from attorneys’ fees awards are sequels to our prior decision in this same litigation in Leroy v. City of Houston, 831 F.2d 576 (5th Cir.1987) (L eroy IV), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1008, 108 S.Ct. 1735, 100 L.Ed.2d 199 (1988).
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991-03-22 · Published · cited 30× · 818 S.W.2d 338; 1991 Tenn. App. LEXIS 198
818 S.W.2d 338 (1991) JAMES CABLE PARTNERS, L.P., A Delaware limited partnership doing business as Big South Fork Cablevision, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. The CITY OF JAMESTOWN, Tennessee, being represented by its Mayor, Stoney C. Duncan, and its Aldermen, Bob Bow, Harold Whited, Cordis Taubert, Mark Choate and Cain Choate, Defendant/Appellant. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Nashville.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956-06-26 · Published · cited 20× · 299 P.2d 131; 1956 OK 202; 1956 Okla. LEXIS 515
299 P.2d 131 (1956) L.M. MORRIS, Plaintiff in Error, v. The CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY; Oklahoma Industries, Inc., a corporation; William Gill, Jr. and Philip J. Rhoads, Trustees of the Oklahoma City Airport Trust; The Oklahoma City Airport Trust; The First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Defendants in Error. No. 37345. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. June 26, 1956.
Illinois Supreme Court · 1906-10-23 · Published · cited 4× · 224 Ill. 43; 79 N.E. 296
Mr. Justice Carter delivered the opinion of the court: March 18, 1837, the United States government gave a patent to fractional section 10, north-west of the Illinois river and now in the city of Peoria, to Benjamin Mills, as assignee of John L. Bogardus. In 1834 the fractional northeast quarter of section 9 was patented to the county commissioners of Peoria county, upon which qua
Supreme Court of Florida · 1915-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 69 Fla. 288; 67 So. 974
• Whitfield, J. This appeal is from an order ovreruling a demurrer to a hill of complaint, and from an order denying a petition for a rehearing upon the demurrer. The bill of complaint in effect alleges that R. J. Knight executed mortgages on certain lands to secure an indebtedness; that subsequent to the execution of the mortgages, the mortgagor executed to the Crystal River Lumber Company a contract-to convey the timber on the
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928-09-18 · Published · cited 2× · 270 P. 851; 133 Okla. 51; 1928 OK 536; 1928 Okla. LEXIS 989
As a resident taxpayer, A. E. Deutsch, the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, brought this action in the district court of Oklahoma county against the city of Oklahoma City, a municipal corporation and defendant in error herein, to enjoin the defendant from entering into a contract with the firm of Maney, Alley Watson for the construction of a bridge over the North Canadian river on Robinson street in Oklahoma City, and from expending any of the funds of Oklahoma City for that purpose, upon t
Supreme Court of Florida · 1934-01-18 · Published · cited 25× · 153 So. 87; 113 Fla. 760
The City of Leesburg appealed from a decree entered by the Judge of the Circuit Court for the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit dismissing the city's bill of complaint exhibited in that court against G. G. Ware, J. C. Lee and *Page 761 A. L. Miller, as bond trustees of the city, and against The First National Bank of that city. The decree also ordered the costs to be assessed against the city and allowed reasonable solicitor's fees to be paid out of the trust fu