Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*1507 JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Wayne Eugene Ritter was tried and convicted of capital murder on April 26, 1977, in the Mobile County, Alabama, Circuit Court. The trial court sentenced him to death. After exhausting his review by way of direct app

Ross, J.: The Court below properly granted a nonsuit as to the defendant Hayward, because the proof on the part of the plaintiff showed that Hayward was not a partner at the time of the commencement of the action, nor at any time when the transactions occurred of which an accounting is demanded; and because the interest of Hayward in the premises had its inception prior to June 11,1878, after which time it was that the agreeme

On June 16, 1917, A.H. Tuttle was the owner of Lot 20 in Block 17 in Farwell Place, an addition now included within the incorporated limits of the city of Des Moines, Iowa. On that date, he, with his wife, Cathrina J. Tuttle, executed and delivered to one B.J. Cavanagh a promissory note, secured by mortgage on said property, bearing the same date, for the sum of $1,400, payable June 16, 1922. This mortgage was duly recorded. On April 1, 1918, B.J. Cavanagh assigned this mortgage and note to t

Richards, J. This action was commenced by Frances Ritter in the common pleas court to re*73cover damages for a personal injury resulting from a fall on an icy sidewalk. The petition was met with a demurrer, which was sustained in the trial court, and, the plaintiff not desiring to plead further, final judgment was rendered dismissing her petition. To this action of the cou

Howk, J. — The issues joined in this cause were tried by the court, at special term, and at the request of the appellant, the plaintiff below, the court made a special finding of facts and .stated its conclusions of law thereon, in substance, as follows: *81“ On the 6th day of May, 1872, one Solomon P. Stern was the owner in fee simple of the pr

This action was originally commenced in a justice of the peace court, to recover damages for the loss of a mule, alleged to have been occasioned by a defective bridge in the town of Sallisaw. A demurrer was sustained to the petition in the justice of the peace court, and an appeal was taken therefrom to the county court of Sequoyah county, where the petition was held sufficient to state a cause of action. The petition, after alleging the defendant's corporate character, the location of

558 F.2d 775 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Anthony Paul DIADONE, John Eli Stone, Richard Carl Biggs,Reuben Goldstein, and John Denton Ritter,Defendants-Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James William "Puny" WINNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 75-2991, 75-3222. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit.

1 2025 CO 13 The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff</

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Tuttle Roofing Company, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated February 22, 2008, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereo

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff We-Try-Harder, Inc. (WTH) leased a fleet of cars to defendant, Tran-southern Freight System, Inc. One of the cars collided with a car driven by Ricky Thompson. Ricky Thompson recovered a judgment in the amount of $770,000 in a state negligence action against WTH as owner of the leased vehicle. WTH had agreed to provide $250,000 liab

1 2025 CO 9 Board of Governors of the Colorado State University, Petitioner v. Renee Alderman, Respondent No. 23SC565Supreme Court of Colorado, En BancFebruary 24, 2025 Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Case No. 22CA1140. Atto

[Cite as Shinn v. Columbus, 2025-Ohio-183.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Linda Shinn et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : Donald Cade, : No. 24AP-181 (C.P.C. No. 22CV-1589) Plaintiff-Appellant, :

527 F.3d 299 (2008) Richard LAWRENCE; Kevin Jackson; John Cole; Scott D. McGarrigle; Richard Marks; Ivan T. Damjanovic; Morgan Miller; Alan Sigal; W. Russel Bryant; Mervin K. Ghani; Alleyne Arturo; Joni H. Kuonen; Domenic Rosati; John W. Getty; Joseph C. Mancini; William Brent; Michael Brooks; Duane J. Boyes; Michael A. Flak; J. Todd Vreeland; Adam Wojnicki; Timothy S. O'Toole; Carl F. Pfefferle; Beth Ann Glynn; William Murphy; Matthew Konieczka; Cory Bu

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blackburne, J.), dated June 10, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of the plaintiffs’ case. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, and a new trial is granted with costs to abide the event. The instant ac

Filed 07/30/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 175 Paul Sorum, Marvin Nelson, Michael Coachman, Charles Tuttle and Lisa Marie Omlid, each on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated tax payers of the State of North Dakota, Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants v. The State of

Corrected Opinion Filed 8/17/20 by Clerk of the Supreme Court Substitute Opinion Page 2, Paragraph 4 and Page 3 filed 08/04/2020 Filed 07/30/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 175 Paul Sorum, Marvin Nelson, Michael Coachman, Charles Tuttle and Lisa Marie Omlid, each on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated tax payers of the State of North Dakota,

In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Labor Law § 193 to recover wages wrongfully withheld and Labor Law § 198-c to recover vacation pay, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Peck, J.), entered March 25, 2004, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 193, and granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was for summa

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on assault and battery, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated October 29, 1997, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the defendant cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied the branch of his motion which was for the imposition of sanctions.

After the allowance of the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration over the plaintiffs’ objection, there were hearings before' the arbitrator, and he rendered his award. The defendant’s motion to confirm the award of the arbitrator was also allowed over the plaintiffs’ objection. The plaintiffs appealed from the order allowing the motion to compel arbitration, the order confirming the award of the arbitrator, the order denying the plaintiffs’ motion to