⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “Rita Rene McCall”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
People v. Plummerpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999-06-25 · Published · cited 20× · 714 N.E.2d 63; 306 Ill. App. 3d 574; 239 Ill. Dec. 505; 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 448
714 N.E.2d 63 (1999) 306 Ill. App.3d 574 239 Ill.Dec. 505 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny PLUMMER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-95-3400. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. June 25, 1999. Rehearing Denied July 29, 1999.
People v. Williamspublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994-05-16 · Published · cited 17× · 635 N.E.2d 781; 262 Ill. App. 3d 734; 200 Ill. Dec. 442; 1994 Ill. App. LEXIS 771
635 N.E.2d 781 (1994) 262 Ill. App.3d 734 200 Ill.Dec. 442 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antwon WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-92-2549. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. May 16, 1994. *784 Rita A. Fry, Cook County Public
People v. Hooperpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 1996-01-25 · Published · cited 25× · 665 N.E.2d 1190; 172 Ill. 2d 64; 216 Ill. Dec. 633; 1996 Ill. LEXIS 15
665 N.E.2d 1190 (1996) 172 Ill.2d 64 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Murray HOOPER, Appellant. No. 76068. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 25, 1996. Rehearing Denied June 3, 1996. *1191 Rita A. Fry, Public Defender, Chicago (R.H.R. Silvertrust, Assistant Public Defender
People v. Cosmepublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993-05-28 · Published · cited 18× · 617 N.E.2d 364; 247 Ill. App. 3d 420; 187 Ill. Dec. 156; 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 758
617 N.E.2d 364 (1993) 247 Ill. App.3d 420 187 Ill.Dec. 156 PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Horatio COSME, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-89-3131. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. May 28, 1993. *366 The Public Defender of Cook County, C
Nevada Supreme Court · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NV 6
137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT
People v. Kingpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993-06-18 · Published · cited 14× · 618 N.E.2d 709; 248 Ill. App. 3d 253; 188 Ill. Dec. 139; 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 905
618 N.E.2d 709 (1993) 248 Ill. App.3d 253 188 Ill.Dec. 139 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lance KING, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 1-88-0798, 1-89-2086. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. June 18, 1993. *712 Public Defender of Cook
Coleman v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 820 So. 2d 166; 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 204; 2001 WL 1149542
I agree with the majority's unpublished memorandum as to all issues except Issue IV. As to Issue IV, I dissent, based on Judge Shaw's special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, Aug. 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). As to those points of law on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, supra. *Page 167 DECISIONS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPIN
United States Court of Federal Claims · 1998-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 41 Fed. Cl. 553; 6 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1067; 1998 U.S. Claims LEXIS 172; 1998 WL 427343
OPINION YOCK, Judge. These consolidated civilian pay cases1 are before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss one claim of certain plaintiffs on collateral estoppel grounds and on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ seven claims.2 For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s motion to dismiss one claim of 227
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS