⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “Ripple v. Marble Falls Independent School District”

District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015-03-27 · Published · cited 12× · 99 F. Supp. 3d 662; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39078; 2015 WL 1640554
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS EZRA, District Judge. On January 23, 2015, the Court held a hearing on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Marble Falls Independent School District (“Defendant”) (“Mot.,” Dkt. #31.). Martin J. Cirkiel, Esq., represented Plaintiff Blake Alan Ripple (“P
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016-07-11 · Published · cited 12× · 194 F. Supp. 3d 551; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89237; 2016 WL 3669889
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant’s 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Original Complaint (Doc. 14). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND1 This case arises from the alleged sexual harassme
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019-06-05 · Published · cited 4× · 390 F. Supp. 3d 822
Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge A public school officer in the Katy Independent School District's police department tased and handcuffed J.W., a 17-year-old special-education student. His mother, Lori Washington, sued the Katy Independent School District and School Resource Officer Elvin Paley for violating of J.W.'s federally protected rights. (Docket Entry Nos. 1, 12). After discovery, the Katy School District
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009-08-27 · Published · cited 61× · 579 F.3d 754; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19318; 2009 WL 2615822
579 F.3d 754 (2009) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin TRUDEAU, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-4249. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 14, 2009. Decided August 27, 2009. *756 C. Steven Baker, Attorney, Federal Trade Commission, Chicago, IL, Lawrence Demille-Wagman, Attor
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-08-28 · Published · cited 29× · 887 F. Supp. 2d 133; 2012 WL 3671924; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121685
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) STATE OF TEXAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1303 ) (TBG-RMC-BAH
Beatty v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2026-05-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOYCE BEATTY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 25-cv-4480 (CRC) DONALD J. TRUMP et al., Defendants. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Background ..............................................................
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983-01-05 · Published · cited 116× · 690 F.2d 489
690 F.2d 489 111 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2787, 112 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2525,95 Lab.Cas. P 13,877,1982-83 Trade Cases 65,021,3 Employee Benefits Ca 2273 CARPENTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 1846 OF the UNITED BROTHERHOOD OFCARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, etal., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.PRATT-FARNSWORTH, INC.; Halmar, Inc.; Associated GeneralContractors of Louisiana, Inc., At-Large District; andAs
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982-11-04 · Published · cited 34× · 690 F.2d 489; 111 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2787
RANDALL, Circuit Judge; This appeal essentially involves an all-out assault by two unions and other related parties on the so-called “double breasted” 1 system of conducting business utilized by contractor employers in the construction business in the New Orleans area. Hotly contested causes of action are alleged under several legal theories, primarily pursuant to the federal labor and antitrust
MacK Appealpublic domain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956-10-05 · Published · cited 24× · 386 Pa. 251; 126 A.2d 679; 1956 Pa. LEXIS 394
386 Pa. 251 (1956) Mack Appeal. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 13, 1956. October 5, 1956. *253 Before STERN, C.J., JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ. Charles E. Kenworthy, with him Walter T. McGough and Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, for appellants. Fred B. Trescher, J.J.