Cases

Opinion SCHALLER, J. The defendant town of Enfield appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) reversing in part and affirming in part the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner). The plaintiff, Salvatore Rinaldi, cross appeals from the same decision. On appeal, the defendant claims that the board improperly failed to include

361 F.Supp. 177 (1973) KAN KAM LIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dominick RINALDI, as District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service of New Jersey, and William P. Rogers, as Secretary of State of the United States of America, Defendants. LAM, YI KAM, Plaintiff, v. Dominick RINALDI, as District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service of New Jersey, and William P. Rogers, as Secretary of State of the United Stat

An appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dated October 3, 1952, which granted appellant’s application to reopen and reconsider the board’s decision of July 12, 1951, and upon such reconsideration adhered to the earlier decision. That decision had found appellant, William Fritzhand, and his predecessors subject as covered employers to the taxing provisions of Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, art. 18) from August 20, 1948, an

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHY BISSOON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 3) and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 15). A hearing took place on December 3, 2014. Upon full consideration of the evidence presented, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction will be denied, and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss will be granted in pa

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge: Plaintiff Thomas D. Raffaele (“plaintiff’ or “Judge Raffaele”) brings this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 and New York state law against the City of New York (the “City”); former New York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly; Queens District Attorney Richard A. Brown; Assistant District Attorneys Daniel O’Leary and Pe

APPEL, Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent from the result in this case. I. Factual Background. ■The material facts are straightforward and undisputed. Senn was stopped by police officer Brian Cuppy during the early morning hours of September 1, 2014. Cuppy initiated the stop because Senn failed to bring his vehicle to a stop in front of an intersection but came to a st

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0624 Filed June 24, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. JOHN ARTHUR SENN JR., Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Kevin A. Parker and Gregory D. Brandt, District Associate Judges. Defendant challenges the constitutionality of Iowa Code section 804.20, contending a right to counsel attached under article I, section 10 of the Io

Opinion KATZ, J. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the receipt of state disability retirement benefits by the plaintiff, Diana Starks, must be considered in determining her discretionary benefits awarded pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 31-308a2 of the Workers’ *3Compensation Act, contained i

251 F.Supp.2d 1143 (2003) William T. PERKS, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF HUNTINGTON and Susan Scarpati-Reilly, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-4811. United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 12, 2003. *1148 Edward J. Yule, Law Offices of Edward J. Yule, P.C., Northport, NY, for Plaintiff. Ernest R. Stolzer, Rains & Pogrebi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0624 Filed June 24, 2016 Amended September 21, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. JOHN ARTHUR SENN JR., Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Kevin A. Parker and Gregory D. Brandt, District Associate Judges. Defendant challenges the constitutionality of Iowa Code section 804.20, contending a right to counsel

129 F.Supp.2d 436 (2001) Victor J. CIPOLLA and Susan E. Martin, Plaintiffs, v. The COUNTY OF RENSSELAER, County of Rensselaer Executive's Office, Henry Zwack, individually and as County Executive for the County of Rensselaer, Joseph Cybulski, individually and as Deputy County Executive for the County of Rensselaer, Daniel Ehring, individually and as Deputy County Attorney for the County of Rensselaer, Jack Madden, individually and in his capacity

Marshall, C.J. The issue in this case is whether, by enacting the public records law, G. L. c. 66, § 10, and G. L. c. 4, § 7, *445Twenty-sixth, the Legislature intended to extinguish the protection provided by the attorney-client privilege to public officers or employees and governmental entities subject to that law. The case arises in conjunction with a dispute between S

777 A.2d 385 (2001) 342 N.J. Super. 536 NEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH PLANS, Plaintiff, v. John J. FARMER, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, Karen L. Suter, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Banking and Insurance of the State of New Jersey, and the New Jersey Insolvent Health Maintenance Organization Assistance Association, Defendants.

869 F.Supp. 158 (1994) Willie Claud BROWN, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK; Herman L. Jenkins as City Personnel Director of The Department of Personnel of the City of New York; Rudolph J. Rinaldi as Commissioner of The Department of Buildings of the City of New York; Betsy Gotbaum as Commissioner of The Department of Parks and Recreation of the City of New York; and Bernard H. Jackson as Chair of The New York City Civil Service Commission, Def

697 A.2d 478 (1997) 346 Md. 484 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION v. Nancy S. FOX. No. 95 Sept. Term, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. July 30, 1997. *479 Andrew Auerbach, Assistant Attorney General (Joseph J. Curran, Jr., Attorney General; Lynn M. Weiskittel, Assistant Attorney General, on

*583EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Section 803(d) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d), sets both absolute and relative limits on attorneys’ fee shifting. The district court held these limits unconstitutional because they disadvantage prisoners compared with other plaintiffs, whose recoveries under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) in constitutional-tort

MIKVA, Circuit Judge: Taxation with Representation of Washington (Taxation) challenges the lobbying restrictions on certain nonprofit organizations required by Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3), as a violation of its First *717Amendment and equal protection rights. The whole of Taxation’s argument well exceeds the sum of its parts.

359 Mass. 55 (1971) 267 N.E.2d 897 DEMETRIOS DAMASKOS & others vs. BOARD OF APPEAL OF BOSTON & another. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. February 1, 1971. March 16, 1971. Present: TAURO, C.J., SPALDING, CUTTER, SPIEGEL, & BRAUCHER, JJ. *56 Thomas G. Shapiro (Wi

Dominic S. Rinaldi, J. In this article 78 proceeding petitioners seek to restrain the Board of Education from making or continuing the appointments of “ Administrators ” and “ Demonstration Elementary School Principals ’ ’ and to restrain the continuance of one Edna Gordon as Principal of P. S. 36-125 Manhattan. Upon examination of the submitted papers I found that issues of fact existed which required a trial fo

433 F.Supp. 756 (1977) Gilbert R. X. HALL v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al. Gilbert R. X. HALL and James Edw. Carter, v. Marvin MANDEL, Governor, et al. James Edw. CARTER v. Harold M. BOSLOW, Director, Patuxent. James Edw. CARTER and Gilbert R. X. Hall v. Harold M. BOSLOW, Director of Patuxent. James E. CARTER, Inmate, Patuxent Institution, et al. v. Robert J. LALLY, Secretary, Maryland Department of Publ