Cases

No. 2--03--1434 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ________________________________________________________________ ______________ MARY T. RIGGS, ) Appeal from

812 N.E.2d 1027 (2004) 351 Ill.App.3d 268 286 Ill.Dec. 12 Mary T. RIGGS, Plaintiff and Counter-defendant-Appellee, v. WOMAN TO WOMAN, OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, P.C., Defendant and Counter-plaintiff-Appellant. No. 2-03-1434. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. July 8, 2004. *1028

331 F.Supp.2d 673 (2004) ENGATE, INC., Plaintiff, v. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES, L.L.C. and Atkinson-Baker, Inc. Defendants. No. 01 C 6204. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 20, 2004. *674 *675 *676 Joseph A. Grear, Law

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ MEYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES LIMITED AND MEYER CORPORATION, U.S., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BODUM, INC., Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ 2011-1329 __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northe

Dismissal of Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction Because Plaintiff Is Without the Rights Plaintiff Claims in the Proceeds of a Government Contract OPINION HEWITT, Chief Judge I. Background 1 Plaintiff Red Hawk Construction, Inc. (plaintiff or Re

312 S.W.3d 243 (2010) In re WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, Relator. Wachovia Securities, LLC, Appellant, v. Jeffrey H. Mims, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Dennis Serio, Appellee. No. 05-08-01029-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. May 3, 2010. *244 William Ross Forbes Jr., Jackson Walker, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Appellan

745 F.Supp.2d 852 (2010) AIA ENGINEERING LIMITED, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. MAGOTTEAUX INTERNATIONAL SIA and Magotteaux, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiffs. Magotteaux International S/A and Magotteaux, Inc., Third Party Plaintiffs, v. Vega Industries, Ltd., Inc., Third Party Defendant. No. 3:09-00255. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.<

944 P.2d 984 (1997) 149 Or. App. 641 Janice M. MEARS, Appellant, v. William R. MARSHALL, M.D., and Collagen Corporation, Respondents. 9307-04839; CA A85078. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted on Remand May 22, 1997. Decided September 10, 1997. *985 Maureen Leonard, Portland,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF COURT KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge. I. SYNOPSIS This matter comes before the Court on Defendants DePuy, DePuy Orthopedics, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson’s “Motion to Dismiss” . (Doc. No. 11). Defendants moved to dismiss the instant action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and (6). Pursuant to the agreement of the parties to dismiss all

905 P.2d 1154 (1995) 137 Or. App. 390 Janice M. MEARS, Appellant, v. William R. MARSHALL, M.D., and Collagen Corporation, Respondents. 9307-04839; CA A85078. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted July 10, 1995. Decided October 25, 1995. *1158 Susan A. Allinger, Houston, Texas, a

886 P.2d 1068 (1994) 131 Or. App. 726 Andy ANDERSON, Appellant, v. EVERGREEN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., Respondent. 9211-08016; CA A82288. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted September 28, 1994. Decided December 14, 1994. *1069 Kevin Keaney, Portland, argued the cause, for

OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. This post-award bid protest filed by the incumbent contractor, Infiniti Information Solutions, LLC (“Infiniti”), challenged the award of a contract to Ideogenics, LLC (“Ideogenics”) to provide internet-related support services for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). That contract had been awarded pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S

Post-trial decision in patent case; U.S. Patent No. 7,748,325 entitled “Firearms Projectile;” patent validity; 35 U.S.C. § 103 (2006); infringement by M855A1 and M80A1 ammunition; “reasonable and entire compensation” for the compulsory, non-exclusive patent license; 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a) OPINION AND ORDER 1

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Wallace’s Bookstores, Inc. (“Wallace’s”), formerly a major operator of college bookstores, contracted to operate the campus bookstores of defendants-appellees Eastern Kentucky University (“EKU”), Southern University (“Southern”), and Southern Illinois University (“SIU”). Each contract required Wallace’s to post a surety or performance bond. Appellant Lyndon Property Insurance Co. (“Lyndo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANEESA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 25-cv-1540 (CRC) GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza following Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on the country roiled American co

644 F.Supp. 1125 (1986) The CANADIAN MEAT COUNCIL and Its Members, Including Canada Packers, Inc., Plaintiffs, Alberta Pork Producers Marketing Board, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, National Pork Producers Council, et al., Defendants-Intervenors. Court No. 85-09-01168. United States Court of International Trade. September 12, 1986.

793 P.2d 338 (1990) 102 Or.App. 159 James ELVIN, Joyce E. Bedient, Gary F. Burnett, Jack Fulton, David M. Garrick, Roland Giesbrecht, Harold W. Jacobs, Warren C. Johnson, Jr., Loren P. Link, Dennis D. Mattison, Doug Sanford, Gregg L. Spooner, Thomas W. Tesch, Kenneth N. Twidwell, Albert S. Wenzel, James E. Yost, and Paul Berg, Respondents, v. OREGON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNION, Petitioner. UP 38-87; CA A50

847 S.W.2d 324 (1993) TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION, Relator, v. The Hon. David BRIONES, Judge of the County Court at Law No. One, El Paso County, Texas, Respondent. No. 08-92-00337-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. January 13, 1993. Rehearing Overruled February 3, 1993. *325 Ken Slavin, Brower & Slavin,

13 F.Supp.2d 35 (1998) MINEBEA CO., LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Georg PAPST, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 97-590 SSH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 22, 1998. *36 *37 Tom M. Schaumberg, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, Washington, DC, Joel E. Lutzker (pro hac vi

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. The Regents of the University of California (UC) appeal from the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, holding that Eli Lilly & Company (Lilly) does not infringe U.S. Patent 4,652,-525 or U.S. Patent 4,431,740 in its manufacture of human insulin; that the asserted claims of the ’525 patent are invalid; and that both paten