Cases

[Cite as State v. Ridgeway, 2021-Ohio-3450.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 29892 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE PHILIP B. RIDGEWAY

[Cite as Lowery v. Ridgeway, 2015-Ohio-5051.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY THERESA LOWERY FKA THERESA RIDGEWAY, CASE NO. 5-15-20 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. OPINION JAMES RIDGEWAY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. Appeal from Hancock County Common Pleas

Case: 19-30791 Document: 00515549988 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/02/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. This case arises out of the deterioration of a decade-plus employment relationship between Stryker Corporation and Christopher Ridgeway. Stryker, a medical-device manufacturing company, employed Ridge-way as a sales representative, where he sold customized plates and screws for use in craniomaxillofacial (CMF) sur

Opinion by JUDGE DUNN {1 Defendant, Lewis Burton Ridgeway, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of burglary tools. We conclude that the elemental instruction submitted to the jury on possession of burglary tools omitted the intent element of the crime. Because the instructional error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, we reverse the judgment of c

712 S.E.2d 84 (2011) RIDGEWAY v. The STATE. No. A11A0240. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 15, 2011. Teresa Lynn Smith, for appellant. *85 William Kendall Wynne Jr., Dist. Atty., Anne Marie Kurtz, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. SMITH, Presiding Judge. Nathaniel Ridgeway appeals from his conviction of theft

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHARLES RIDGEWAY; JAIME Nos. 17-15983 FAMOSO; JOSHUA HAROLD; 17-16142 RICHARD BYERS; DAN THATCHER; WILLIE FRANKLIN; TIME OPITZ; D.C. No. FARRIS DAY; KARL MERHOFF, 3:08-cv-05221-SI Plaintiffs-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants, OPINION v. WALMART INC., DBA Wa

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Joseph Wallace Ridgeway filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Ridgeway claims that his counsel was deficient by failing to inform Ridgeway about the mandatory minimum sentence for his crime. Ridgeway asserts that, if his attorney had correctly advised

WOOD, J., This fascinating case raises issues of constitutional import. Although the analysis is complicated, and the result not altogether satisfying logically, I conclude that I must rule against the defendant, and will not suppress the evidence. On July 19, 1998, defendant William Ridgeway and Elizabeth Declet were living together in an apartment at 663 East Union Street, West Chester, Chester County, Pennsylv

*1314 PER CURIAM: Larry James Ridgeway appeals his 87-month sentence, imposed following his guilty plea to one count of possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). Ridgeway challenges a condition of his supervised release requiring him to refrain from “conduct or activit

The plaintiff Al Ridgeway, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of his wife Debbie Ridgeway, appeals from summary judgments for the defendants CSX Transportation, Inc. ("CSX"), and the Town of Thorsby, in an action to recover damages for personal injury and wrongful death.1 We affirm. A summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgm

194 Ill. App.3d 881 (1990) 551 N.E.2d 790 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TERRY LYNN RIDGEWAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-89-0218. Illinois Appellate Court — Fourth District. Opinion filed February 28, 1990. *882 *883 Daniel D. Yuhas and Lawr

OPINION OF THE COURT Hancock, Jr., J. P. Defendant seeks reversal of her conviction for felony murder upon, among others, the following grounds: (1) that her confession was inadmissible because given after her critical stage right to counsel had attached by virtue of the issuance of a Federal arrest warrant; (2) that her confession was involuntary and obtained in violation of her Miranda rights; and

November 24, 1926. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The facts of this cause are set out fully in the report of A. C. Todd, Esq., special referee. That report and the decree of his Honor, circuit Judge Featherstone, both of which will be reported, are entirely satisfactory to this Court. The judgment of this Court is that the exceptions of the appellant be overruled, and that the decree of Judge Featherstone, which confirmed the report of the referee, be, and the same is, hereb

This is an appeal by Rhea H. Owens from an instructed verdict in a suit to cancel and rescind tow assignments of oil and gas leases to him by defendants below, Grover C. Ridgeway, Jr., and Malcolm L. Morrison, of 3/4 of their 8/8 working interest therein to specified depths in the oil and gas leases on two sections of land in Beaver County, Oklahoma, described as Sections 8 and 17, Township 6 North, Range 22 E.C.M. upon which is situated a gas well known as Taylor No. 1. The parties w

117 Ill. App.2d 176 (1969) 254 N.E.2d 117 James Lavery, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ridgeway House, Inc., a Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Gen. No. 53,002. Illinois Appellate Court — First District, Fourth Division. December 3, 1969. *177 Rosenbaum & Rosenbaum, of Chicago (Irvin Tischer, of cou

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice. The present case is a sequel to Ridgeway v. Catlett, 238 Ark. 323, 379 S. W. 2d 277. That case was decided on June 1, 1964; and in it we said that since Ridgeway had been convicted of the crime of embezzling public funds, no executive pardon could restore to him eligibility to hold public office (Art. 5, § 9 of the Arkansas Constitution). As a direct result of that holdi

243 Md. 358 (1966) 221 A.2d 393 RIDGEWAY SHOPPING CENTER, INC. v. SEIDMAN [No. 374, September Term, 1965.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided July 5, 1966. The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HAMMOND, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER and BARNES, JJ. Benjamin Lipsitz for appellant. Henry J. Frankel for appellee.<

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 430 Action by Harvey W. Ridgeway and another against Frank L. McGuire and J. Rossman for the amount of secret profits made by defendant Rossman on resales of two parts of realty purchased by him from plaintiffs. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. AFFIRMED. This is an action against a real estate br

60 F.Supp. 363 (1945) RIDGEWAY et al. v. WARREN. Civil Action No. 28. District Court, M. D. Tennessee, Columbia Division. May 7, 1945. Noble L. Freeman, of Lawrenceburg, Tenn., for plaintiffs. John J. Hooker, of Nashville, Tenn., E. W. Eggleston, of Franklin, Tenn., and Foster F. Locke, of Lawrenceburg, Tenn., for defendant. DAVIES, District Judge.