Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rider v. Green River Preserve”
Foust v. Forest Preserve Districtpublic domain
Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of thi
Phillips Ex Rel. Green v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
453 F.Supp.2d 690 (2006) Antonia PHILLIPS by her parents and natural guardians Gertral GREEN and Antonio Phillips, and Gertral Green and Antonio Phillips, individually, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Kakilia Kinsey, Jesus Rivera, "John" Newmark, first name being fictitious and unknown, Shemain Webb, "John Does" and "Jane Does," said names being fictitious arid unknown, Catholic Home Bureau, Marina Seda, "John Roes" and "Jane Roes," said nam
U.S. Ex Rel. Lamers v. City of Green Baypublic domain
998 F.Supp. 971 (1998) U.S. ex rel. Allen LAMERS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GREEN BAY, Defendant. No. 95-C-684. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 13, 1998. *972 *973 Robert Parent, Roels, Keidatz & Parent, DePere, WI, Steven D. Gordon, Leslie S. Spitalney, Holland & Knigh
Davis v. Otten and Meemic Insurancepublic domain
#29691-r-JMK 2022 S.D. 39 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** CATHERINE DAVIS, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RICHARD OTTEN, Defendant, and MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. **** APPEAL FROM THE
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT EDGAR ALFONZO BANKS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) WD84186 ) KANSAS CITY AREA ) Opinion filed: October 26, 2021 TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ) )
Price v. Pearsonpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) DENISE PRICE, individually and as the ) personal representative and administrator ) of the Estate of Jeffrey Price, Jr., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.
Corbett v. County of Lakepublic domain
Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tos v. State of Californiapublic domain
Filed 11/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- JOHN TOS et al., C089466 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2016-
Lynam v. Blue Diamond LLCpublic domain
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD R. COOCH NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE RESIDENT JUDGE 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 10400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3733
Munnelly v. Fordham Univ. Facultypublic domain
Paul G. Gardephe, United States District Judge Plaintiff Kevin Munnelly brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, challenging Defendants' denial of mental health benefits for residential treatment services provided to his 17-year old son, "C.M." (S
Frey v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
23-365-cv Frey v. City of New York United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2023 Argued: January 30, 2024 Decided: September 19, 2025 No. 23-365-cv _____________________________________ JASON FRE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term _____________ FILED November 20, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 20-0007 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK _____________
McCann v. City of San Diegopublic domain
Filed 10/8/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA MARGARET MCCANN, D077568 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- CITY OF SAN DIEGO et. al., 00011813-CU-TT-CTL) Defendants and Respondents.
Arnot v. Endresen (In re Endresen)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RANDALL L. DUNN, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge • On December 18, 2014, I heard oral argument (“Hearing”) on the motion for summary judgment (“SJ Motion”) filed by plaintiff Stephen P. Arnot, Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”), and the cross-motions for summary judgment (“Cross-Motions”) filed by the debtor defendants Michael and Joanne Endresen (the “Endresens”) and by the lender defendants, The Bank o
Commonwealth v. Fitzpatrick III, J., Aplt.public domain
[J-70-2020] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BAER, C.J., SAYLOR, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 6 MAP 2020 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court dated F
Zuckerman v. Bevinpublic domain
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS: FRED ZUCKERMAN, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GENERAL DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 89 AND WILLIAM LONDRIGAN, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE KENTUCKY STATE AFL-CIO, ITS AFFILIATED UNIONS AND MEMBERS, William E. Johnson, Johnson Bearse, LLP, Irwin H. Cutler, Jr., Benjamin S. Basil, Matthew P. Lynch, Priddy Cutler Naake & Meade PLLC, Robert Matthew Colone, Teamsters Local 89, David O'Brien Suetholz, Devon Nora Ros Oser, Bra
Alvarez v. Hillpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BLACKIE ALVAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 06-35068 JEAN HILL, Superintendent; MAX WILLIAMS; MITCH MORROW; J. D.C. No. CV-04-00884-BR GILMORE; S. FRANKE; T. OPINION O’CONNOR; SONJA HOYT; T. ARMSTRONG; S. BABB; CAIN; RIDER
Harness v. Watsonpublic domain
Case: 19-60632 Document: 00516445896 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/24/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 24, 2022
ROGERS, Circuit Judge: This case concerns multiple challenges under the National Environmental Policy Act to Maryland’s proposed “Purple Line” light rail project.'Two orders of the district court are principally at issue. In the first order, the district court directed the Federal. Transit Administration (“FTA”) to prepare a supplemental
Hanks v. Hankspublic domain
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. b This is a contentious child custody case. From a judgment awarding shared joint custody — week-on, week-off, 50-50 time with each parent — and designating neither party as domiciliary parent, the mother, Ann Hanks (“Ann”), appeals. The father, Raymond Hanks, Jr. (“Ray”), answers the appeal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the award of shared joint custody, but remand to the trial court with the follow