Cases

(2008) Javier DIAZ-PEDROSA, et al. et al., Plaintiffs v. PUERTO RICO POWER AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 07-1680(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 21, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dockets ## 12, 14 & 15), and Plaintiffs' Op

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I Certiorari CONSEJO DE TITULARES procedente del DEL CONDOMINIO MONT Tribunal de BLANC Primera Instancia, KLCE202500610 Sala de San Juan Parte Recurrida

SENTENCIA En este caso revocamos una sentencia parcial mediante la cual se desestimaron las reclamaciones de la sociedad legal de gananciales y de la esposa del codemandante, quien fue alegadamente discriminado en su empleo. En síntesis se alegó que el Sr. Fernández Grullón fue trasla-dado en su empleo de manera discriminatoria por razón de su nacionalidad. Aplicando los fundamentos de Maldonado v. Banco Central C

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I EL PUEBLO DE PUERTO Certiorari RICO procedente del Tribunal de Recurrido Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de

6/5/2020 8:53:51 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 18-1334.pdf 18-1334_new.pdf versus 15 pages (299 KB) 15 pages (348 KB)

*168 OPINION & ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Before the Court is plaintiffs’ José Isidro La Santa-Andreu (“La Santa”) and Marcelo Diaz’s (“Diaz”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) motion for attorney’s fees, a second motion for attorney’s fees, and defendant Bristol Myers Squibb Manufacturing Company’s (“BMS” or “defendant”) respec

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court are plaintiff Cesar I. Cruz’s motions to set aside the judgment. (Docket Nos. 203 and 205.) For the reasons explained below, the Court DENIES plaintiffs motions. I. BACKGROUND This case has been closed since April 18, 2011, when the Court granted summary judgment and dismisse

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2019 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

6/8/2020 11:54:17 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 18-1334_new.pdf 18-1334_new1.pdf versus 61 pages (348 KB) 61 pages (345 KB)

777 F.Supp.2d 321 (2011) Cesar CRUZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY PR, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 08-1424 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 15, 2011. *325 Frank E. Laboy-Blanc, Humacao, PR, for Plaintiffs. Ana B. Rosado-Frontanes, Lourdes C. Hernandez-Venegas, Schuste

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. On August 29, 2008, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order ordering plaintiffs to show cause “why the court should not dismiss all co-plaintiffs except Cesar I. Cruz his wife and their conjugal partnership (the first named plaintiffs) and order the remaining plaintiffs each to file an individual complaint asserting his individual claims.” (Docket No. 23 at 2) Th

per curiam: El 25 de mayo de 2000, la Sra. Belinda Vélez Vázquez (Sra. Vélez Vázquez o quejosa) presentó ante el Procurador General (Procurador) una queja en contra de los abogados Héctor M. Hernández Nazario y Louis A. De Mier-Le Blanc (los querellados), en la que les imputa no haber sido orientada sobre los términos prescriptivos para ir en alzada de una determinación de la Junta de Síndicos del Sistema de Retiro de Empleados d

La Juez Asociada Señora Rodríguez Rodríguez emitió la opi-nión del Tribunal. Nos corresponde resolver si el Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico goza de inmunidad por la omisión de un Regis-trador de la Propiedad quien, al inscribir una sentencia judicial en el libro de Registro de Sentencias del Registro de la Propiedad, omitió mencionar el nombre de uno de los codemandados contra quien había recaído una sent

130 F.Supp.2d 246 (2001) Alfredo APONTE DIAZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NAVIERAS PUERTO RICO, INC.; Holt Hauling & Warehousing Systems, Inc.; NPR Holding Corporation. Defendants. No. CIV. 98-1917(HL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 23, 2001. *247 *248 Dennis A. Simonpie

213 F.Supp.2d 81 (2002) Carmen M. RIVERA OCASIO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. CIV.01-2504 JAG/GAG. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 26, 2002. *82 Luis A. de Mier-Le Blanc, San Juan, PR, for plaintiff. Camille Vélez-Rivé, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Juan, PR, for defendant

63 F.Supp.2d 165 (1999) Hector COSTA DEL MORAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SERVICIOS LEGALES DE PUERTO RICO, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 96-1872(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 1, 1999. *166 Frances Colon Rivera, Goldman, Antonetti, San Juan, Puerto Rico, for plaintiffs. Frank Inserni, San Juan,

PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs commenced these wrongful death and survival actions to recover damages arising out of the deaths of Frank and Helen Kirchoff (both 51 years old), who were killed on March 5, 1969, while passengers in an airplane which crashed in the El Junque mountain range in the vicinity of San Juan, Puerto Rico, enroute from St. Thomas to San Juan. Plaintiffs are the ad

BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is Peer International Corporation of Puerto Rico ("Peer International")'s motion for attorney's fees, costs and sanctions. (Docket No. 66.) The Court referred Peer International's motion to a magistrate judge for a Report and Recommendation ("R & R"). (Docket No. 68.) For the reasons set forth below, the R & R is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART . P

ORDER GIERBOLINI, District Judge. Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss, without prejudice, the action filed by one of the plaintiff on the ground that under Section 32 of the Puerto Rico’s Workmen’s Accident Compensation Act (the “Act”), 11 L.P.R.A. § 32, plaintiff Roberto Diaz Mojica’s action is premature. Plaintiffs oppose defendants’ motion by arguing that under Section 32 of the Act, a third

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2019 TSPR 233 203 DPR _____ María del Carmen Blanes García Número del Caso: TS-13,368 Fecha: 11 de diciembre de 2019 Programa de Educación Jurídica Continua: Lcda. Maria Cecilia González Molinelli Lcda. María del Carmen Blanes García: Por derecho propio Materia: La suspensión será efectiva el 13 d