⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Ricks v. Bmezine.com, LLC”

District Court, D. Nevada · 2010-07-26 · Published · cited 13× · 727 F. Supp. 2d 936; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75942; 2010 WL 2985795
727 F.Supp.2d 936 (2010) Gregory RICKS, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, v. BMEZINE.COM, LLC, Defendant/Counterclaimant. BMEzine.com, LLC, Third Party Plaintiff, v. Gee Whiz Domains Privacy Service, Third Party Defendant. No. 2:08-CV-01174-PMP-GWF. United States District Court, D. Nevada. July 26, 2010. *942 Mark R. Borghe
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019-04-18 · Published · cited 1× · 376 F. Supp. 3d 1322
Timothy C. Batten, Sr., United States District Judge This case comes before the Court on Defendants John Does' motion [33] to dismiss for failure to state a claim and first motion [41] for sanctions. Also before the Court is Plaintiff Dar Thompson's motion [47] to strike Defendants' reply brief [46] in support of their motion for sanctions. I. Background1
Xereas v. Heisspublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-03-27 · Published · cited 35× · 933 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2013 WL 1225392; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43262
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Plaintiff John Xereas brings this action against Marjorie Heiss, Geoffrey Dawson, Riot Act D.C., LLC (“the LLC”), and Squiid, Inc., alleging claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, conversion, breach of contract, breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair deal
District Court, C.D. California · 2014-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 995 F. Supp. 2d 1107; 110 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1438; 2014 WL 462960; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16804
Order re: Defendant’s IMotion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [17] RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior District Judge. Currently before the Court is Defendant Del Monte Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [17]. Plaintiff Del Monte International GmbH (“Plaintiff’) filed its Opposition on November 6, 2013 [21]. Defendant filed its Rep
District Court, S.D. California · 2018-06-12 · Published · cited 16× · 316 F. Supp. 3d 1234
(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MARKETQUEST'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 205]; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIC CORP.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 216]; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BIC USA AND NORWOOD'S MOTION