⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Rickenbacker v. County of Suffolk”

District Court, E.D. New York · 2010-04-26 · Published · cited 6× · 707 F. Supp. 2d 421; 76 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 917; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40851; 2010 WL 1641454
707 F.Supp.2d 421 (2010) Rochelle RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK and Alfred Tisch, in his official capacity as Suffolk County Sheriff, Defendants. No. 07-cv-1250 (ADS)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 26, 2010. *423 Jon Norinsberg, Esq., PLLC, by Jon L. Norinsberg, Esq., Bennitta L. Joseph, Esq., o
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-04-23 · Published · cited 1× · 365 F. Supp. 2d 347; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6924; 2005 WL 936933
365 F.Supp.2d 347 (2005) Lowrita RICKENBACKER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendants. No. 03 CV 1773(ADS)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 23, 2005. *348 Lowrita Rickenbacker, Massapequa, NY, pro se. Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, by Stephen
District Court, E.D. New York · 1992-02-28 · Published · cited 5× · 786 F. Supp. 218; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2550; 1992 WL 41048
786 F.Supp. 218 (1992) Matthew J. SOLOMON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Defendant. No. CV 91-4411. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 28, 1992. *219 *220 Schapiro & Reich by Perry S. Reich, Lindenhurst, N.Y., for plaintiff. James, Catterson
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981-11-23 · Published · cited 38× · 665 F.2d 427; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15762
OAKES, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves the extent of an indigent criminal defendant’s right to competent counsel on appeal from a New York State criminal conviction and the extent of his appellate counsel’s duty to raise and argue particular issues at the defendant’s request. The case arises out of the denial of a habeas petition by the United States District Court for the E
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-08-25 · Published · cited 18× · 81 F.4th 101
21-1999-cr (L) United States v. McPartland, Spota UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2022 (Argued: October 20, 2022 Decided: August 25, 2023) Nos. 21-1999-cr, 21-2004-cr –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980-03-17 · Published · cited 52× · 612 F.2d 624
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: The petitioner, John Indiviglio, appeals from an order entered on January 8, 1979, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Mishler, Chief Judge) dismissing his petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his conviction and to set aside his sentence. The judgment of conviction was entered on August 16, 1974,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978-01-03 · Published · cited 18× · 569 F.2d 724; 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13214
GURFEIN, Circuit Judge: These are consolidated appeals by Philip Floyd Tolliver from (1) his conviction upon the verdict of a jury in the District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Dool-ing, J.), which found him guilty of the crimes of bank robbery by force or intimidation (Count One) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) an
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972-06-26 · Published · cited 22× · 459 F.2d 1304
459 F.2d 1304 148 U.S.App.D.C. 280 John DOE et al., Appellants,v.John L. McMILLAN et al. No. 71-1027. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued June 7, 1971.Decided Jan. 20, 1972.Certiorari Granted June 26, 1972.See 92 S.Ct. 2505. Mr. Dennis Du