⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Richmond v. Rauner”

California v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-10-25 · Published · cited 0× · 267 F. Supp. 3d 1119
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge The Affordable Care Act requires health insurance companies to subsidize the cost of co-payments and deductibles for lower-income people. In turn, the Act requires the federal government to make advance payments to the companies to cover the cost of this subsidy. The legab
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2011-09-12 · Published · cited 8× · 812 F. Supp. 2d 1306; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108208; 2011 WL 4363919
812 F.Supp.2d 1306 (2011) The ESTATE OF Juanita Amelia JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. VENTAS REALTY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and Ventas, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 8:11-cv-1314-T-23AEP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. September 12, 2011. *1307 Ashlie N. Merchant, Bennie Lazzara, Jr., Blair Mendes, Isaac R. Ruiz-C
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2009-05-29 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION Before this Court is the motion of Defendants Town of Exeter ("the Town") and the Exeter Planning Commission ("the Commission") for summary judgment against Plaintiff Phillip Salisbury ("Salisbury"). Defendants argue that the present action, in which Salisbury seeks a declaratory judgment that he is legally entitled to use a certain parcel of property for ingress and egress, is barred by collateral estoppel, res
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-03-24 · Published · cited 1× · 84 F. Supp. 3d 705; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36277; 2015 WL 1396376
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge, United States District Court Before the Court is a constitutional challenge to federal and state programs designed to benefit disadvantaged business entities (“DBEs”) in the highway construction industry. Plaintiff Midwest Fence (hereinafter, “Plaintiff’ or “Midwest”), a non-DBE fencing and guardrail contractor that is owned and controlled
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1988-01-15 · Published · cited 22× · 364 S.E.2d 757; 234 Va. 658; 5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1424; 4 Va. Law Rep. 1633; 1988 Va. LEXIS 12
234 Va. 658 (1988) 1988 Va. LEXIS 12 364 S.E.2d 757 AVOCET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND ANDREW J. SERAFIN V. THE McLEAN BANK Record No. 840977 Supreme Court of Virginia January 15, 1988 Michael A. Mays for appellants. Douglas D. Walker (Henry C. Mackall; Mackall, Mackall, Walker & Silver, on brief), for appellee.</