Cases

MARTIN L. C. FELDMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is the plaintiffs' motion to remand. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED, and Louisiana Citizens is DISMISSED without prejudice. Background This lawsuit arises out of the purchase and installation of alleged Chinese drywall in a residence located in New Orleans, Louisiana following Hurricane Katrina.

208 F.3d 498 (5th Cir. 2000) In the Matter of NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, Debtor,CENTURY INDEMNITY CO.; INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Appelleesv.NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY SETTLEMENT TRUST; ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Appellants, No. 98-11116 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 31, 2000 [C

ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge: Appellants, 2 a reorganized Chapter 11 Bankruptcy debtor, filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that appellee’s claim stemming from an assumed contract was discharged in the debtor’s earlier bankruptcy proceedings. At summary judgment, the bankruptcy court determined that the claim w

FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Background & Procedural History............................................659 II. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law .......................................660 A. Background: Gypsum & Drywall ........................................660<

CHIEF JUSTICE CARRICO delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal, we are called upon to consider again the constitutionality of the medical malpractice cap imposed by Code §8.01-581.15.1 We previously upheld the constitutionality of the cap in Etheridge v. Medical Center Hospitals, 237 Va. 87, 376 S.E.2d 525 (1989). Two

OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Lippman. Petitioner pro se commenced this RPTL article 7 tax proceeding to challenge the 2006 assessment of his real property lo*178cated in the Town of Richmond by filing and serving on respondent Board of Assessment Review for the Town of Richmond a petition with a notice of petition that contained no return date.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (John J. Ark, J.), entered April 12, 2007 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of respondent to dismiss the petition. It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the petition is dismissed. Memorandum: Sup

MEMORANDUM OPINION NORA BARRY FISCHER, District ' Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiffs Joseph and Gabriella Germinaro commenced this action on February 6, 2014 by filing a complaint in the Los Angeles Superior Court against Defendants Lawyers Title Insurance Company, Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation (collec*443tively,

OPINION Marc W. Brown, Justice This case primarily concerns whether appellee Noble Energy, Inc., 1 owes indemnification to appellant ConocoPhillips Company for underlying environmental claims based on a 1994 Exchange Agreement and Assignment and Bill of Sale involving the exchange of oil and gas

Filed: May 2, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1839 (1:12-cv-01780-WMN) JOYCE BARLOW, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant, and JOHN CRANE−HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED; E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INC.; HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC., f/k/

*43WHITING, J., dissenting. I do not agree with the majority’s conclusion that the General Assembly’s adoption of Code § 8.01-250.1, restoring plaintiffs’ time-barred claim under Code § 8.01-250, violates Virginia’s due process clause as embodied in Article I, Section 11 of our State Constitution.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 05-1063V (To be Published) ***************************** * JOHN A. MURPHY and BARBARA * Special Master Corcoran E. MURPHY, parents of * M.M., a minor, *

Filed: May 2, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1839 (1:12-cv-01780-WMN) JOYCE BARLOW, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant, and JOHN CRANE−HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED; E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INC.; HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC., f/k/

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1839 JOYCE BARLOW, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant – Appellant, and JOHN CRANE−HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED; E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INC.; HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC., f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company; UNIVERSAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY; J.

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board held that D.R. Horton, Inc. had violated the National Labor Relations Act by requiring its employees to sign an arbitration agreement that, among other things, prohibited an employee from pursuing claims in a collective or class action. On petition for review, we disagree and conclude that the Board’s decision did not give proper weight to the Federal Arb

17 F.Supp.2d 564 (1998) CAPITOL CEMENT CORP., a corporation, Plaintiff, v. CEMENT, LIME, GYPSUM, AND ALLIED WORKERS DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, an unincorporated labor organization, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 3:96-CV-689. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. May 22, 1998. Forrest H. Roles, Charleston, Clifford R. Oviatt, K

OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. This case comes before the Court on review of Special Master Christian J. Moran’s May 16, 2011 decision denying compensation to Petitioner, Thomas Ricci, through his parents, Daniel and Eva Ricci, under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (“Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-2-33 (2006). Petitioners allege that the Hepatitis B vaccine Thomas received on Oc

By Judge Jonathan C. Thacher This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff Arevalo’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatory No. 19 and Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 6, 29, 30, and 31. After reviewing the pleadings, each party’s briefs, and the arguments presented at oral argument, the Court partially denies and partially grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. Specifically, the Court denies

MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: Interpace Corporation (“Interpace”) was a manufacturer of concrete pipe. Inter-pace sold some of its pipe to Marbro Company, Incorporated (“Marbro”), for use in a contract between Marbro and the City of Richmond (“the City”), under which Marb-ro was to construct a water transmission main. Some of that pipe has proved to be defective. The case before us concerns the City’s attempts to impose liability

608 F.Supp. 1272 (1985) LEVIN METALS CORPORATION, Levin-Richmond Terminal Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. PARR-RICHMOND TERMINAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. PARR-RICHMOND TERMINAL COMPANY, et al., Counterclaimants, v. Richard LEVIN, et al., Counterdefendants. PARR-RICHMOND TERMINAL COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard LEVIN, et al., Defendants. Nos. C-84-6273 SC, C-84-6324 SC. U