Cases

Justice HEARN. I respectfully dissent and would affirm the decision of the circuit court. In my opinion, the Workers Compensation *394Commission (Commission), when changing the reimbursement rate for ambulatory surgery centers in a manner that substantially alters the prior rate, must afford notice and an opportunity to be heard to those affected by the change. The prop

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Kelaher, Connell & Conner, P.C., Appellant, v. South Carolina Workers' Compensation Commission, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2018-001265 Appeal From Horry County Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5860 Heard February

*22 Justice HEARN. Our State’s tidelands are a precious public resource held in trust for the people of South Carolina. While the tidelands are a finite resource, a bevy of competing environmental, economic, and social uses seek to lay claim to them. The legislative branch has made the policy decisions as to

Justice BURNETT: In this appeal, we are asked to decide the novel issue of whether a physical therapist in South Carolina is statutorily prohibited from working as an employee of a physician who refers patients to the physical therapist for services. *461FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The arrangement at issue, known within the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT... 332 A. North Carolina Voting Laws... 332 1. Voter ID... 332 2. Early Voting... 332 3. Out-of-Precinct Provisional Voting... 334

URBIGKIT, Chief Justice. The Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Division appeals from a district court order restoring legal fees and costs billed by the attorney appointed to represent an injured worker. Counsel petitioned for review by the district court following an administrative hearing examiner’s reduction of her compensation by more than thirty-three percent and disallowance of about half of her costs. The immediate issue is

443 S.E.2d 716 (1994) 336 N.C. 200 CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, d/b/a Carolinas Medical Center; Charlotte Institute of Rehabilitation and University Hospital; Carolina Medicorp, Inc.; Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc.; Medical Park Hospital, Inc.; Duke Medical Center; High Point Regional Hospital, Inc.; Memorial Mission Hospital, Inc.; Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital; and North Carolina Baptist Hospitals, Inc. v.

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Houser. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission REVERSES the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner and enters the following Opinion and Award. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and co

568 S.E.2d 204 (2002) Aaron Dwayne OSMOND, Employee, Plaintiff v. CAROLINA CONCRETE SPECIALTIES, Employer and KEY BENEFIT SERVICES, Carrier, Defendants No. COA01-1203. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 16, 2002. Publication Ordered August 12, 2002. *205 Mark T. Sumwalt, P.A., by Mark T. Sumwalt and Ver

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Edward Garner, Jr. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. * * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing as:

The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinions and Awards based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Lorrie Dollar and the briefs and arguments on appeal. Plaintiff has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence and to amend the holding of the prior Opinion and Award filed July 10, 1998. Accordingly, the Full Commission has modified the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Award. Defendants have not shown good ground to reverse the Interlocutory Op

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Jimmy A. Richardson, II, Solicitor for the 15th Judicial Circuit, on behalf of the 15th Circuit Drug Enforcement Unit, Appellant, v. Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy-One and 00/100 Dollars ($20,771.00), U.S. Currency and Travis Green, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2020-000092 Appeal from Horry County Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28113 Hea

336 S.C. 488 (1999) 520 S.E.2d 634 Vickie BROUGHTON, Employee, Respondent, v. SOUTH OF THE BORDER, Employer, and Schafer Company, Inc., Insurance Department, Insurer, Appellants. No. 3024. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard June 10, 1999. Decided July 6, 1999. Rehearing Denied August 28, 1999.

252 F.Supp.2d 1 (2002) Maximo VILLALOBOS, et als. Plaintiffs v. NORTH CAROLINA GROWERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et als. Defendants No. CIV.97-1589(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 10, 2002. *4 Julio M. Lopez-Keelan, P.R. Legal Services, Migrant Workers Division, San Juan, PR, Mary Lee Hall, Lori Elmer, Alic

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM 1 Presently before this three-judge District Court are eleven consolidated actions challenging as unconstitutional the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81 (2002) (“BCRA”) and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prohibit its enforcement. The wide range of legal challenges raised by this litigati

552 So.2d 1099 (1989) Penny BYRD, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARDSON-GREENSHIELDS SECURITIES, INC., Etc., et al., Respondents. No. 72788. Supreme Court of Florida. October 26, 1989. Rehearing Denied December 19, 1989. Robert E. Weisberg, David M. Lipman and Stefan Ruud of Lipman & Weisberg, Miami, and Rochelle Z. Catz, Ft. Myers, for petitioners

805 P.2d 830 (1991) STATE of Wyoming, ex rel. WYOMING WORKERS' COMPENSATION DIVISION, Appellant (Objector-Defendant), v. James L. BROWN, Appellee (Employee-Claimant). No. 89-134. Supreme Court of Wyoming. January 30, 1991. *831 Joseph B. Meyer, Atty. Gen., Ron Arnold, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Larry M. Donovan, Asst. Atty. Gen.,

428 F.Supp. 1164 (1977) Kenneth D. LEWIS et al., Plaintiffs, v. Elliot RICHARDSON, Secretary of the Department of Commerce, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 77-173-M. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 27, 1977. *1165 *1166 Edward J. Grimley, Jr., City Solicitor, City of La

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 5514413 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Revised September 23, 1998 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 98-10140 _____________________ SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; SOUTHWESTERN BELL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.; SOUTHWESTERN BELL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES-TEXAS, INC.; SOUTHWESTERN BELL INTERNET SERVICES, INC.; P