Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Richardson v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.”
In Re: Red Barn Motors, Inc.public domain
*482 PER CURIAM: These petitions for writs of mandamus ask us to order the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana to vacate its transfer to the Southern District of Indiana. The petitions were filed more than three months after the transfer and after proceedings had begun in the
JOHNS v. SUZUKI MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.public domain
310 Ga. 159 FINAL COPY S19G1478. JOHNS et al. v. SUZUKI MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC. et al. NAHMIAS, Presiding Justice. We granted this petition for certiorari to decide whether OCGA § 51-12-33 (a) applies to a strict products liability claim under OCGA § 51-1-11. The Court of Appeals held that strict products liability claims are subject to such apportionment. See Suzuki Motor of America v. Johns, 351 Ga. App. 186, 198 (830 SE2d 549) (2019). For the reaso
249 F.Supp.2d 463 (2003) SANTANA PRODUCTS, INC. Plaintiff v. BOBRICK WASHROOM EQUIPMENT, INC., Bobrick Corporation, the Hornyak Group, Inc., and Vogel Sales Co. Defendants No. 3:CV-96-1794. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. March 7, 2003. *468 B.Aaron Schulman, Larson & Taylor, Alexandria, V.A. Gerald J. Butler
Barefield v. DPIC Companies, Inc.public domain
DAVIS, J., concurring. In this certified question proceeding the majority opinion has made two holdings. First, the majority opinion has concluded that a bad faith action under the unfair trade practices statute may be instituted against an insurer for misconduct occurring after litigation began in the underlying action. Second, consistent with the decision in Rose v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Holland v. Woodhaven Building & Development, Inc.public domain
687 A.2d 699 (1996) 113 Md. App. 274 Stephen A. HOLLAND, et al. v. WOODHAVEN BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. No. 362, Sept. Term, 1996. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 5, 1996. Opinion Denying Reconsideration January 30, 1997. *701 Thomas J. Gisriel (Drake C. Zaharris and Hod
Cline v. Yellow Transp., Inc., 07ap-498 (12-18-2007)public domain
OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Thomas Cline ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court granted judgment as a matter of law in favor of defendant-appellee, Yellow Transportation, Inc. ("appellee"). *Page 2 {¶ 2} Appellant is an over-the-road truck driver employed by appellee. Early on the
ACCEPTED 05-15-00161-CV 05-15-00161-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 2/9/2015 3:21:23 PM NO.
McLaughlin v. McGee Bros. Co., Inc.public domain
681 F.Supp. 1117 (1988) Ann McLAUGHLIN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. McGEE BROTHERS COMPANY, INC., Sam McGee, Bill McGee, Don McGee, Michael McGee, and Cletus Huntley, Defendants. Ann McLAUGHLIN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. WENDELL'S WOODWORK, INC., Wendell Long, Herbert Long, Defendants. Nos. C-C-86-173-P, C-C-87-420-P.
Motion for En Banc Reconsideration Denied as Moot; Motion for Rehearing Granted; Majority and Dissenting Memorandum Opinions of March 30, 2023, Withdrawn; Judgment of March 30, 2023, Vacated; and Substitute Majority and Dissenting Memorandum Opinions filed June 25, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00765-CV ZHAOHONG WU AND YANJING ZHOU, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF K.W. AND E.W.,
NW Controls, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corporationpublic domain
333 F.Supp. 493 (1971) N. W. CONTROLS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, Plaintiff, v. OUTBOARD MARINE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 3730. United States District Court, D. Delaware. October 28, 1971. *494 *495 *496
569 F.2d 87 186 U.S.App.D.C. 256 John H. SAFER et al.v.Frank M. PERPER et al.DONOHOE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Appellant,v.DWOSKIN, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants.John H. SAFER et al., Appellants,v.Frank M. PERPER et al.v.DWOSKIN, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants. Nos. 75-1576 and 75-1577. Unite
MCBRAYER v. SCARBROUGHpublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Court
MCBRAYER v. SCARBROUGHpublic domain
317 Ga. 387 FINAL COPY S22G1152. MCBRAYER et al. v. SCARBROUGH. ELLINGTON, Justice. In McBrayer v. Scarbrough, 364 Ga. App. 112, 118 (874 SE2d 146) (2022), the Court of Appeals affirmed an order of the Superior Court of Tift County granting a judgment on the pleadings in favor of the Sheriff of Tift County, Gene Scarbrough, in this action brought by Sherrie McBrayer for the wrongful death of her husband, James Aaron McBrayer (“the decedent”). The Court of Appeals held
Berkheimer v. REKM, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Berkheimer v. REKM, L.L.C., 2023-Ohio-116.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY MICHAEL BERKHEIMER, : Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2022-03-026 : OPINION - vs -
King v. Helfrichpublic domain
Julia and Ryan King, et al. v. Cornelius David Helfrich, et al. No. 2094, September Term 2022 Land Use – Zoning and Planning – Variances. In Baltimore County, a zoning agency may grant a variance from the zoning regulations otherwise applicable to a property only if, among other things, that property satisfies the “uniqueness” condition for a variance. To satisfy the uniqueness test, a property must have an inherent characteristic not shared by other properties in the area, such as its shape,
Lee v. Christianpublic domain
ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE Presently before the Court is Defendant Harold Paul Christian’s (“Christian”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 68). Further, Defendants Carl Boyette (“Boy-ette”), Tommy Lowman (“Lowman”), and Mayor Tom Davis (“Davis”) have filed a joint Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 69). The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for decision. For the reasons state
Ali Pineda v. Hamilton Cty., Ohiopublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0320p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ALI PINEDA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │
Blair v. City of Hannibalpublic domain
*906MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings ' [ECF No. 19]. I. BACKGROUND .Plaintiffs Jacob Blair and Sarah Blair (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Class Action Complaint i
United States v. Alvin Drummondpublic domain
TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge: Alvin Drummond was convicted of possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), and he received a sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"),
Dillard, Chief Judge. *49 In 2013, Monumedia, II LLC ("Monumedia"), installed three signs inside the windows of a building located in the Buckhead area of Atlanta that were visible to traffic on Peachtree Road. Not long after that, the City of Atlanta informed Monumedia that the signs violated