Cases

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Lockheed Martin Corporation ) ASBCA No. 62377 ) Under Contract No. N00019-11-C-0083 et al. ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Nicole J. Owren-Wiest, Esq. Catherine Shames, Esq.

644 F.3d 1321 (2011) William SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs, Anthony Mitten, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED-MARTIN CORPORATION, d.b.a. Lockheed-Martin Aeronautics Company, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-15428. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. June 30, 2011. *1322 Daniel M. Klein, John Franklin Beasley, Jr., Edward D

ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge. This is a qui tam action where the government declined to intervene. It is be*1340fore the Court on Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 28], Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Relators’ First Amended Complaint [Doc. 35], and Relat

799 F.Supp.2d 537 (2011) NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. AW-05-1992. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. July 28, 2011. *539 James W. Bartlett, III, Alexander M. Giles, Richard Antoine Tabuteau, Semmes Bowen and Semmes PC, Baltimore, MD, M

486 F.Supp.2d 481 (2007) Richard A. KEEN, Plaintiff, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP. et al., Defendants. John Piatelli, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lockheed Martin Corp. et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 05-CV-4478, 05-CV-6211. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 30, 2007. *482 Richard A. Keen, West Chester

764 F.Supp.2d 756 (2011) NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. AW-05-1992. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. February 14, 2011. *757 James W. Bartlett, III, Alexander M. Giles, Richard Antoine Tabuteau, Semmes Bowen and Semmes PC, Baltimore, M

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) Lockheed Martin Corporation ) ASBCA Nos. 59894, 59895 ) 60422,60423 ) Under Contract No. W31P4Q-08-C-0361 et al. ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Terry L. Albertson, Esq.

357 F.Supp.2d 1350 (2005) LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The BOEING COMPANY, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Boeing Launch Services, Inc., William Erskine, Kenneth Branch, and Larry Satchell, Defendants. No. 6:03CV796ORL28KRS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida. Orlando Division. February 16, 2005. *1354 Kevin

393 F.Supp.2d 1276 (2005) LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The BOEING COMPANY, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Boeing Launch Services, Inc., William Erskine, Kenneth Branch, and Larry Satchell, Defendants. No. 603CV796ORL28KRS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. January 5, 2005. *1277

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Susan Davey brought this employment discrimination action against her former *1207 employer, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMC), alleging LMC discriminated against her on the basis of gender in 1992 and retaliated against her in 1993 for complaining about the discrimination

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This case involves three parties: Plaintiff Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”), Defendant Rantec Power Systems, Inc. (“Rantec”), and Third-Party Defendants Factory Mutual Research Corporation (“FMRC”) and Factory Mutual Insurance Corporation (collectively, the “FM Entities”). Lockheed appeals the district court’s grant of Rantec’s motion for summa

390 F.Supp.2d 1073 (2005) LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The BOEING COMPANY, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Boeing Launch Services, Inc., William Erskine, Kenneth Branch, and Larry Satchell, Defendants. No. 6:03-cv-796-Orl-28KRS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. February 15, 2005. *1074

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: This case raises the discrete question of the applicability of the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine to claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) and alleging a conspiracy among corporate officers and the corporation itself to deter by force, intimidation, or threat, an individual from testifying in a court of the United States. These allegations plainly describe criminal conduct in violation

BROWN, J., Concurring. I agree that there is “no per se or categorical bar” to the class treatment of medical monitoring claims (lead opn., ante, at p. 1105), and that there are some common issues (see lead opn., ante, at pp. 1106-1108). I also agree that “the trial court *1112abused its discretion in granting the instant certification motion” becau

134 P.3d 641 (2006) 142 Idaho 790 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Petitioner-Respondent, v. IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellant. No. 32022. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 2006 Term. April 21, 2006. *642 Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General, Boise, for appellant. Lawrence G. Allen, Depu

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company ) ASBCA Nos. 62249, 62727 ) Under Contract No. N00019-02-C-3002 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: John E. McCarthy, Jr., Esq. Nicole J. Owren-Wiest, Esq.

367 F.Supp.2d 118 (2005) LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP., Plaintiff, v. RFI SUPPLY, INC., et al., Defendants and RANTEC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. STAR SPRINKLER, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. CIV.A.00-11818 JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 20, 2005. Randy W. Gimple, Carlson, Calladine & P

BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

16 S.W.3d 127 (2000) LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Appellant, v. August GORDON, Alfred Allen and wife, Mary Allen, Eddie Bennett and wife, Rosa Mae Bennett, Eddie J. Billingsley and wife, Arlene Billingsley, Willie J. Bolden and wife, Patricia Bolden, Oscar William Booker, Samuel Boswell and wife, Billie Ruth Boswell, Robert L. Brasfield and wife, Dorothy A. Brasfield, Dennis Brown, Individually and as personal Representative of The Estate of Port

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company ) ASBCA No. 62209 ) Under Contract No. FA8625-07-C-6471 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Stephen J. McBrady, Esq. J. Chris Haile, Esq.