⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Richard W Parks”

North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2004-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Holmes and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2010-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 687 F. Supp. 2d 564; 2010 WL 272530
687 F.Supp.2d 564 (2010) Carlos Andreas PARKS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. Nos. 5:05CV267-1-V, 5:99CR11-14-V. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division. January 13, 2010. *565 Arnold R. Henderson, Arnold Henderson & Associates, Richmond, VA, for Petitioner. Amy E.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-08-30 · Published · cited 0× · 965 F. Supp. 2d 67; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124231
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge. The National Parks Conservation Association and nine other organizations 2 brought this suit against the Secretary of the Interior and the Northeast Regional Director of the U.S. National Park Service (“NPS”) challenging NPS’ decis
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 895 F. Supp. 2d 124; 2012 WL 4475681; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140134
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, United States District Judge. The plaintiffs, parents of seven students who prevailed in separate administrative proceedings brought under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act and the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act (collectively, “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-06-20 · Published · cited 8× · 275 F.R.D. 17; 79 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1386; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64758
MEMORANDUM ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Plaintiffs, the parents of seven students who allegedly prevailed in seven separate administrative proceedings brought under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act and the Individuals with Disabilities in Education and Improvement Act (collectively “IDEA”), codified at 20 U.S.C. § 14
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019-06-11 · Published · cited 0× · 385 F. Supp. 3d 662
John Robert Blakey, United States District Judge *667This dispute arises out of the City of Chicago (City) and the Chicago Park District's (Park District) efforts to bring the Obama Presidential Center (OPC) to the City's South Side. Plaintiffs sue to prevent construction of the OPC on a specific site within Jackson Park. [91] ¶ 1. Following this Court's ruling on Defen
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 368 F. Supp. 3d 1184
John Robert Blakey, United States District Judge This order does not address the true facts of this case. Nor does it decide the legal merits of Plaintiffs' key claims. Instead, as with many rulings on motions to dismiss, this order merely clears away portions of the case that do not belong. As explained below, this Court grants in part, and denies in part, Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [48].
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016-01-06 · Published · cited 1× · 185 So. 3d 541; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 237; 2016 WL 304686
CORRECTED OPINION PER CURIAM. Anthony Parks appeals a circuit court order that found that he remained in contempt of an earlier contempt order and sentenced him to thirty days in jail with an opportunity to purge only after he completed that sentence. The sentence was to be served consecutively to another sentence Parks- was serving in Miami-Dade County. We
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017-08-16 · Published · cited 42× · 2017 SD 50; 900 N.W.2d 840
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice [¶1.] Troy, Valley, and Butler Townships’ respective boards of supervisors vacated portions of several section-line highways in Day County. South Dakota’s Department of Game, Fish, and Parks appealed these administrative actions to the circuit court, asserting the highways provided access to bodies of water held in trust by the State for the public. The
Parks v. Ricepublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004-05-14 · Published · cited 14× · 809 N.E.2d 1192; 157 Ohio App. 3d 190; 2004 Ohio 2477
{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties' briefs, their supplemental authority, and their oral arguments before this court. Plaintiffs-appellants, Glennda and Richard Parks, appeal from the decisions of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas, which granted summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Premium Marcor Group, Inc., Westfield Insurance Company, Petro Stopping Centers, L.P., and Employers of Waus
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 160 F. Supp. 3d 1060; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13187; 2016 WL 427565
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN W. DARRAH, United States District Court Judge Plaintiffs brought this action, seeking to enjoin Defendants from proceeding with *1062the construction of a museum on land that is adjacent to Lake Michigan. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, which was denied in part and granted in part on March 1
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 89 S.W.3d 395; 2002 Ky. LEXIS 225; 2002 WL 31730975
WINTERSHEIMER, Justice. This appeal is from a judgment based on a conditional guilty plea which convicted Parks of murder, first-degree robbery and being a first-degree persistent felony offender. He was sentenced to a total of twenty years in prison. The sole question presented is whether the trial judge properly denied the motion to dismiss the indictment following the failure of the Commonwealth to brin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005-01-25 · Published · cited 8× · 395 F.3d 643; 2005 WL 147077
KEITH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff appeals the district court’s denial of declaratory and injunctive relief in this case involving an alleged infringement upon Plaintiffs First and Fourteenth Amendment freedom of speech rights. For the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the district court’s decision and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion. I.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008-08-06 · Published · cited 8× · 190 P.3d 487; 221 Or. App. 484; 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1106
190 P.3d 487 (2008) 221 Or. App. 484 Bradley COLEMAN and Bonnie Coleman, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OREGON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, by and through STATE of Oregon, and John Does 1-3, Defendants-Respondents. 05CV0272, A131472. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted August 22, 2007. Decided August 6, 2008
Michigan Supreme Court · 2018-12-04 · Published · cited 0× · 920 N.W.2d 123
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Parks v. Cooperpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004-02-25 · Published · cited 27× · 2004 SD 27; 676 N.W.2d 823; 2004 S.D. LEXIS 28
2004 SD 27 ORDEAN PARKS, AUSTIN SCHILEY, PATRICIA SCHILEY, RAYMOND L. PARKS, IRL WILLIAM SCHILEY, HARLO HOUSE, INC. (whose principal owner is HAROLD WIDVEY), CHARLES SAYLOR, THE ESTATE OF CONSTANCE SAYLOR, LORRAINE STAMPS, REUBEN PARKS, AND VERNON L. PARKS TRUST, REUBEN PARKS, ORION PARKS, OTTO DEUSCHLE, VERNON L. PARKS TRUST, ORVILLE CHRISTOPHERSON, JOE MATTHEWS, MICHAEL MATTHEWS, ROBERT DALE, GREG PESALL, RANDY KNUTSON, MIKE DALE, JEROME DALE, MIKE EGE
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003-01-22 · Published · cited 2× · 243 F. Supp. 2d 244; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 778; 2003 WL 152763
243 F.Supp.2d 244 (2003) Kevin PARKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES, Defendant. Civil Action No. 02-48. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 22, 2003. *247 Richard N. Lipow, Malvern, PA, for plaintiffs. William F. McDevitt, James W. Christie, Christie, Pabarue, Mortensen & Young, Ph
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004-09-29 · Published · cited 25× · 385 F.3d 694; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20495; 2004 WL 2169413
385 F.3d 694 Douglas R. PARKS, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Richard H. FINAN; Ronald T. Keller; Kenneth L. Morckel; Lee A. Darden, Defendants-Appellants. No. 03-3848. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 16, 2004. Decided and Filed: September 29, 2004. Appeal from the United
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2005-01-27 · Published · cited 11× · 157 S.W.3d 499; 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 561; 2005 WL 171354
157 S.W.3d 499 (2005) Edward LAMBRIGHT, Richard Moore, Eric Kimball, Terry Ricks, and Calhoun County Shrimpers, Appellants, v. TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT and Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission, Appellees. No. 03-03-00748-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. January 27, 2005. *502 James B. Blackburn Jr., Blackburn &
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2004-02-05 · Published · cited 57× · 150 S.W.3d 452; 2004 WL 35543
150 S.W.3d 452 (2004) TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT, Appellant, v. Milburn DEARING; Kenneth Head; and Mike Warren, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellees. No. 03-03-00131-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. January 8, 2004. Rehearing Overruled February 5, 2004. *454 Ric