Cases

858 F.2d 345 47 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1825,47 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,344, 57 USLW 2215,57 USLW 2279 Jesse B. DAVIS and Richard Lorence Harris, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee,Teamsters Local 299; et al., Defendants. No. 87-1505. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Feb.

614 N.W.2d 169 (2000) 241 Mich. App. 1 Nathaniel COLE, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. LADBROKE RACING MICHIGAN, INC., d/b/a Detroit Race Course—Ladbroke, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Docket No. 210975. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted January 6, 2000, at Detroit. Decided May 9, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. Re

Per Curiam. Petitioner Peter J. Guidarelli submitted petitions to respondent Schenectady County Board of Elections naming him as a *1148candidate for the office of member of the Schenectady County Legislature, District 1, representing both the Republican Party and the Conservative Party,* as well as an independent body known as the Alli

[Cite as Mathers v. Gibson, 2018-Ohio-1697.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TERRI MATHERS, GUARDIAN : JUDGES: OF ROBERT MATHERS, ET AL. : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. Plaintiffs-Appellees : Hon. Earle

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS JEFFREY ALKER MEYER, District Judge. It has long been the rule that a Title VII plaintiff alleging that she was the victim of employment discrimination may not seek relief in a federal court until she timely exhausts her administrative remedies before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). The principal question in this case is whether a plaintiff should

*412OPINION By ROBERTS, J. The proposition now for consideration is as to whether or not this endorsement that the car is principally used and maintained in North Lima is a condition precedent. It will be observed that this statement is in the present tense, indicating its use at the time of the issuance of the policy. Presumably, h

STRAUB, Circuit Judge: On October 27, 2009, we certified questions to the Connecticut Supreme Court regarding the scope of Connecticut quasi-judicial immunity for conservators and court-appointed attorneys for conservatees, as well as regarding the role of such actors and of nursing homes that house conservatees in the Connecticut system. On April 3, 2012, the Connecticut Suprem

58 F.Supp.2d 576 (1999) UNITED STATES of America v. William Michael STRUBE No. 1:CR-97-0108-02. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 19, 1999. *577 Benjamin S. Waxman, William R. Tunkey, Robbins, Tunkey, Ross, Amsel, Raben & Waxman, P.A., Miami, FL, Mark D. Lancaster, Joan M. Tiberio, Karsh & Lancaster, P

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Jul 13 2016, 8:20 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establis

STRAUB, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants Lori Schlessinger (“Schlessinger”) and Brenda Pianko (“Pianko”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Denis R. Hurley, Judge), dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiffs argue that they purchas

604 A.2d 1249 (1992) STATE v. Richard GOMES. No. 90-413-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. March 13, 1992. *1251 James E. O'Neil, Atty. Gen., Annie Goldberg, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jeffrey Greer, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff. John F. Cicilline, Providence, for defendant. OPINION SHEA, Justice

Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM DECISION ALLAN L. GROPPER, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Introduction Debtor Jesup & Lamont, Inc. (“JLI”) filed a voluntary chapter 11 bankruptcy petition on July 30, 2010. About seven weeks later, on September 24, 2010, its wholly owned broker-dealer subsidiary, Jesup & Lamont Securities Corp. (“JLSC”), also filed under chapter

[Cite as Dispatch Printing Co. v. Recovery Ltd. Partnership, 2015-Ohio-381.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT The Dispatch Printing Co. et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : No. 14AP-473 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CV-422

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1699T Filed: May 31, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * MEIR PERETZ, * * Plaintiff, Tax Refund; 26 U.S.C. § 6532 * Statute of Limita

This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, of Hamilton County. On May 15, 1987, appellee Roger Bissmeyer and Fifth Third Bank of Cincinnati filed applications for appointment of a guardian over the person and estate, respectively, of James Bissmeyer. The probate court granted the applications on May 26, 1987, after a hearing for which no transcript is part of the record certified to this court. Appellant William A. Bissmeyer, Jr. fi

OPINION BY LAZARUS, J.: Crane Co. (“Crane”) appeals from judgments entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in two asbestos-related lawsuits. Because the issues raised on appeal in both matters are substantially similar, we have, sua sponte, consolidated the cases for purposes of disposition. After careful review, we a

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1699T Filed: May 31, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * MEIR PERETZ, * * Plaintiff, Tax Refund; 26 U.S.C. § 6532 *

*146 OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Coolspring Stone Supply, Inc., the beneficiary of an insurance policy on the life of one of its principals, appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the insurer, defendant American States Life Insurance Company.

OPINION MINZNER, Justice. {1} Petitioners Evilia Madrid and Cinesio Sanchez appeal from a memorandum opinion of the Court of Appeals affirming an adverse decision and order of the district court. See Madrid v. Rodriguez (In re Estate of Duran), No. 21,384 (N.M.Ct.App. Feb. 13, 2002). The district court ruled that Petitioners have no interest in a tract of r

66 P.3d 326 (2003) 133 N.M. 553 2003-NMSC-008 In the Matter of the ESTATE of Salome DURAN, deceased, Evilia Madrid and Cinesio Sanchez, Petitioners-Petitioners, v. Grace Rodriguez, personal representative, and Joe Gallegos, Respondents-Respondents. No. 27,399. Supreme Court of New Mexico. March 7, 2003.