Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Richard Nelson and Janet Nelson”
Nelson & Hill, P.A. v. Woodpublic domain
537 S.E.2d 670 (2000) 245 Ga. App. 60 NELSON & HILL, P.A. v. WOOD. Wood v. Nelson & Hill, P.A. Nos. A00A0764, A00A0765. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 12, 2000. *672 Nelson, Hill, Lord & Beasley, Janet E. Hill, J. Hue Henry, Athens, for appellants. Dreger & McClelland,
James Graham v. Nelson Peltzpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0184p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: THE WENDY’S COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION. │ ________________________________________
Rebecca Nelson v. James Duvallpublic domain
*444 Mann, J. ¶1 In 2006, the Washington State Legislature created the Sexual Assault Protection Order Act (SAPOA), chapter 7.90 RCW, with the intent of creating a civil remedy allowing victims of sexual assault to obtain a protection order against future interactions with their assailants. In order to obtai
Patrice Nelson v. MillerKnoll, Inc.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0192p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PATRICE NELSON, as personal representative of the │ Estate of Jaquel
People v. Nelsonpublic domain
JUSTICE GARMAN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion. Justice Kilbride dissented, with opinion. OPINION Following a jury trial in October 2006,
Nelson v. Haydenpublic domain
67 P.3d 98 (2003) 138 Idaho 619 Gregory J. NELSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John HAYDEN, Chairman, Idaho Board of Correction; David Munroe and Janet Jenkins, Members, Idaho Board of Correction; James C. Spalding, Director, Idaho Department of Correction; Joseph S. Klauser, Warden, Idaho State Correctional Institution; A. Steve Shayne, Lieutenant, Idaho State Correctional Institution; Jay A. Green, Sergeant and Disciplinary
State of Arizona v. Janet Yellenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF ARIZONA, No. 21-16227 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:21-cv-00514- DJH JANET YELLEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; RICHARD K. DELMAR, in OPINION his official capacity as acting inspector gene
Stoebner v. Opportunity Finance, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge Appellant/Plaintiff John R. Stoebner,1 Trustee in bankruptcy for Polaroid Corporation and other related debtors (“the Polaroid Debtors”) appeals from a January 14, 2016 order (“the Order”) of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota (“Bankruptcy Court”) and an oral order made
Kirk Brand Coburn v. Janet Morelandpublic domain
OPINION J. WOODFIN JONES, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from a modification order in a “high-conflict” suit affecting the parent-child relationship (SAPCR). 1 The appellant, Kirk Brand Coburn, challenges the trial court’s modification order, which (1) increased his monthly child-
Watkins v. Nelsonpublic domain
729 A.2d 484 (1999) 321 N.J. Super. 482 Lawrence WATKINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Beverly NELSON and Kevin Nelson, Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted December 9, 1998. Decided May 28, 1999. *485 Joel C. Seltzer, Union, for plaintiff-appellant. Jo
PS Ex Rel. Nelson v. the Farm, Inc.public domain
658 F.Supp.2d 1281 (2009) P.S. and C.S., by their Guardians, Linda NELSON and Randall Nelson, Plaintiffs, v. THE FARM, INC., Defendant. Case No. 07-2210-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 8, 2009. *1284 Michaela Shelton, Shelton Law Office P.A., Overland Park, KS, for Plaintiffs. Amy S. Lemley, Brooke
OPINION DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge. The primary issue presented in these criminal appeals is whether the district court’s method of jury selection — a method in which the parties were required to reduce a pool of 30 qualified jurors to a panel of 14 by using all of them peremptory challenges, with the court then designating two alternates by random d
Commonwealth of Ky. v. Janet Yellenpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0245p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY; STATE OF TENNESSEE,
Nelson v. Commonwealthpublic domain
403 S.E.2d 384 (1991) Wayne William NELSON v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. No. 1140-89-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia. April 9, 1991. *385 Elwood E. Sanders, Jr., for appellant. Janet F. Rosser, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Mary Sue Terry, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Conway, Asst. Atty. Gen., on brief), for appellee. Present: DUFF, K
Janet G. Peterson v. Meritain Health, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 54 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2022 April 20, 2022 JANET G. PETERSON, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. S-21-0123 MERITAIN HEALTH, INC. Appellee (Defendant).
Forester v. Chertoffpublic domain
500 F.3d 920 (2007) Willie A. FORESTER; Larry E. Davenport; Alfredo Chavez; Carlos M. Teran; and Donald E. Evans, Sr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael CHERTOFF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Defendant-Appellee. No. 05-16517. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 17, 2007[*], [**]. Filed August
Cruz v. County of Santa Barbarapublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Appellant, Efren Cruz, appeals from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the County of Santa Barbara and the City of Santa Barbara. Cruz alleges various constitutional violations arising from his 1997 convictions for second degree murder and attempted murder, which were later vacated. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo t
Diaz v. Gatespublic domain
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge. David Diaz appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Diaz brought suit under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, alleging wrongful conviction and incarceration. The district court determined that Diaz failed sufficiently to plead injury to “business or property” as required to proc
Diaz v. Gatespublic domain
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. Diaz alleged that as a result of a predicate RICO act, he “lost employment.”1 I fail to see why this isn’t enough to allege injury to his “business.or property” and, therefore, to state a RICO claim. This case is quite unlike Oscar v. University Students Co-op. Ass’n, 965 F.2d
Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securitypublic domain
669 F.3d 983 (2012) Rahinah IBRAHIM, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; Michael Chertoff, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Tom Ridge, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Terrorist Screening Center; Donna Bucella, in her official capacity as former Director of the Terrorist Screening Center; Federal Bure