⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Richard Martin v. Hyundai Motor America”

California Court of Appeal · 2024-12-17 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/17/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA MARITZA ZAVALA, D082747, D082940 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. PSC1807879) HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, Defendant and Appellant. CONSOLIDATED APPEALS from orders and a judg
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 135× · 896 F.3d 278
THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2024-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR ANGELA MARTIN, et al., ) No. ED112165 ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County v. ) Cause No. 23SL-CC02311
Indiana Supreme Court · 2005-02-22 · Published · cited 51× · 822 N.E.2d 947; 56 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 339; 2005 Ind. LEXIS 142; 2005 WL 407529
822 N.E.2d 947 (2005) HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC., Appellant (Defendant below), v. Sandra GOODIN, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 82S05-0406-CV-279. Supreme Court of Indiana. February 22, 2005. *948 Julia Blackwell Gelinas, Robert B. Thornburg, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Scott M. Cohen, John D. Barker, Chic
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004-03-10 · Published · cited 2× · 804 N.E.2d 775; 52 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 878; 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 400; 2004 WL 434064
804 N.E.2d 775 (2004) HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC., Appellant-Defendant, v. Sandra GOODIN, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 82A05-0303-CV-155. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 10, 2004. *777 Robert B. Thornburg, Locke Reynolds, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. John D. Barker, Krohn & Moss, Ltd. Chicago, IL, Attor
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997-07-29 · Published · cited 19× · 698 A.2d 631
MONTEMURO, Judge. Appellants, Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) and McCafferty Hyundai Sales, Inc. (McCafferty) appeal from the judgment entered in the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas following the denial of their post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and/or a new trial. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. The facts giving rise to the underlying action are as follows. On June 1, 1988, Ap
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011-08-10 · Published · cited 5× · 655 F.3d 1266; 99 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1681; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16500; 2011 WL 3487025
655 F.3d 1266 (2011) MHL TEK, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NISSAN MOTOR CO. and Nissan North America, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants, and Hyundai Motor Co., Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama LLC, Kia Motors Corporation, and Kia Motors America, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants, and Dr. Ing. h.c.F. Porsche AG, Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants, and Subaru of America, Inc., and Sub
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2021-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01886-SCT HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA AND HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY v. OLA MAE APPLEWHITE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AND WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF DOROTHY MAE APPLEWHITE, DECEASED, CEOLA WADE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AND WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF ANTHONY J. STEWART, DECEASED, AND KENNETH CORDELL CARTER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AND WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFI
California Court of Appeal · 2008-10-22 · Published · cited 4× · 167 Cal. App. 4th 905; 84 Cal. Rptr. 3d 545; 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1674
167 Cal.App.4th 905 (2008) DELBERT WILLIAMSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. G038845. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. October 22, 2008. *907 Niddrie, Fish & Buchanan, Martin N. Buchanan; Law Offices of David J. Bennio
District Court, C.D. California · 2012-06-12 · Published · cited 21× · 284 F.R.D. 504; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91394; 2012 WL 2250040
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On December 10, 2010, plaintiffs David J. Keegan, Luis Garcia, Betty Kolstad, Carol Hinkle, Eric Ellis, Charles Wright, and Jonathan Zdeb filed this putative class action against American Honda Motor Co., Inc., and Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc., alleging claims under the Califor
California Court of Appeal · 2024-10-10 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/10/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO VADIM GOROBETS, B327745 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 19STCV11540) JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL fr
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 28× · 137 F. Supp. 3d 430; 2015 WL 5773895
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge: In these actions, Plaintiffs claim that certain paintings they purchased from Defendant Knoedler Gallery, LLC (“Knoedler”) are forgeries. In addition to Knoedler, all Plaintiffs name the following as defendants: 8-31 Holdings Inc. (“8-31”), Knoedler’s. sole member; Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s managing member and the owner of 8-31 H
California Supreme Court · 2026-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA VADIM GOROBETS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. S287946 Second Appellate District, Division Two B327745 Los Angeles County Superior Court 19STCV11540 August 6, 2026 Jus
California Court of Appeal · 2006-06-02 · Published · cited 147× · 43 Cal. Rptr. 3d 874; 140 Cal. App. 4th 34; 17 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1773; 71 Cal. Comp. Cases 726; 2006 Daily Journal DAR 6921; 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4753; 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 830
43 Cal.Rptr.3d 874 (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 34 Charles GELFO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. No. B178676. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Eight. June 2, 2006. *877 Law Offices of David H. Greenberg, David H. Greenberg, Beverly Hills, and Roslynn
District Court, C.D. California · 2013-11-04 · Published · cited 47× · 42 F. Supp. 3d 1306; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189094; 2013 WL 9885046
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On May 1, 2012, Ali Asghari filed this action on his own behalf and on behalf of a nationwide class of similarly situated individuals, against Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“VW Group”), Volkswagen AG, and Audi AG (collectively, “defendants”).1 On August 10, 201
District Court, E.D. New York · 2007-07-03 · Published · cited 24× · 494 F. Supp. 2d 161; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48418; 2007 WL 1932917
494 F.Supp.2d 161 (2007) TRI-COUNTY MOTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 04-cv-0835-ENV-KAM. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 3, 2007. *162 *163 *164 *165 Jeffrey
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 1994-10-25 · Published · cited 4× · 888 S.W.2d 879; 1994 WL 580930
888 S.W.2d 879 (1994) FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Douglas Stanley, Jr., d/b/a Doug Stanley Ford, Relators, v. Honorable Donald ROSS, Judge of the 4th Judicial District Court, Rusk County, Respondent. No. 12-94-00239-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. October 25, 1994. *881 Mike Hatchell and Gregory D. Smith, Tyler, for relator.
District Court, C.D. California · 2010-11-30 · Published · cited 90× · 754 F. Supp. 2d 1145; 2010 WL 4867562
754 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2010) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNITENDED ACCELERATION MAKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. This document relates to: All economic loss cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 30, 2010. *1151 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton B. Fisher, Jayne
District Court, S.D. New York · 1996-07-26 · Published · cited 11× · 934 F. Supp. 596; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10665; 1996 WL 420088
934 F.Supp. 596 (1996) BRONX AUTO MALL, INC., d/b/a Bronx Acura, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., Defendant. No. 96 Civ. 1099 (LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 26, 1996. *597 Thomas C. Moore, Mark Mendelsohn, Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for Plaintiff. Robert L.