⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Richard Lloyd Pritchett”

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005-03-15 · Published · cited 10× · 609 S.E.2d 439; 169 N.C. App. 118; 2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 540
Pritchett Burch, PLLC ("plaintiff") appeals from the trial court's judgment awarding summary judgment to Rebecca H. Boyd ("Boyd"), W.B. Long ("Long"), John Hunter Dailey ("Dailey"), and Olivia Dailey Alberti ("Alberti") (collectively, "defendants") on its breach of contract claim. Defendants' cross-appeal the award of summary judgment for plaintiff on its quantum meruit claim. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. I. Background In 199
Lloyd v. Jeffersonpublic domain
District Court, D. Delaware · 1999-05-12 · Published · cited 16× · 53 F. Supp. 2d 643; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7411; 1999 WL 305024
53 F.Supp.2d 643 (1999) William LLOYD and Kathaleen McCormick, Plaintiffs, v. Richard JEFFERSON, William McDaniel, and William Hill, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 97-307-GMS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 12, 1999. *644 *645 *646
Cummings v. Malonepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993-06-09 · Published · cited 9× · 995 F.2d 817; 1993 WL 191168
MAGILL, Circuit Judge. Michael Plemmons and Scott Lawson (collectively appellants) appeal from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding them liable for violating the Eighth Amendment rights of appellee Rederick Cummings and awarding nominal damages to Cummings. Appellants claim that the. district court erred (a) by improperly instructing the jury on the mental state necessary to prove an Eighth Amendment violation an
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016-09-28 · Published · cited 5× · 211 F. Supp. 3d 1209; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134816; 2016 WL 5477076
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Valspar Corporation’s Motion to Remand [Doc. No. 4], brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the motion and remands this case to Hennepin County District Court. II. BACKGROUN
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007-06-25 · Published · cited 114× · 492 F.3d 789; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15092; 2007 WL 1804261
492 F.3d 789 (2007) Ricky LOTT, Gerald Sumner, Sandy Becker, and Mike Baldwin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PFIZER, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-3372. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued March 29, 2007. Decided June 25, 2007. *790 Aaron M. Zigler (argued), Korein Tillery, St. Louis, MO, for P
Helms v. Rafterpublic domain
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1994-04-14 · Published · cited 1× · 853 F. Supp. 897; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7166; 1994 WL 236482
853 F.Supp. 897 (1994) Kenneth HELMS, Plaintiff, v. William A. RAFTER, Defendant. Civ. No. 1:93cv75. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division. April 14, 1994. *898 *899 James Michael Lloyd and Robert E. Dungan, Asheville, NC, for plaintiff. Victoria Voight,
United States Circuit Court · 2019-02-25 · Published · cited 0× · 370 F. Supp. 3d 1341
WILLIAM H. STEELE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1345This matter comes before the Court on defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 45) and plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. 47). Both Motions have been briefed and are now ripe. I. Nature of the Case. This dispute ari
Karst v. Shur-Co.public domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016-04-20 · Published · cited 17× · 2016 SD 35; 878 N.W.2d 604; 2016 S.D. LEXIS 61; 2016 WL 1593890
■ZINTER, Justice. [¶ 1.] Richard and Susan Karst sued Shur Company and Wilson Trailer Company on negligence arid strict-liability causes of action.1 Karsts alleged defective design and improper warnings relating to Shur’s electric-tarp system that Wilson included on a grain trailer it sold to Richard. The circuit court granted summary judgment against Karsts on their failure-to-warri claims, and
District Court, District of Columbia · 2005-08-31 · Published · cited 7× · 335 B.R. 234; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18889; 2005 WL 3274494
335 B.R. 234 (2005) THE PLAN COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Defendant. Civ.A. No. 02-1487 RWR. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 31, 2005. *235 *236 *237 *238
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006-05-31 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE NO. 5-04-0525 Decision filed 05/31/06. The text of this decision may be changed or IN THE corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS disposition of the same. FIFTH DISTRICT ________________________________________________________________________ MICHAEL SIMS and TIFFANY SIMS, ) Appeal from the on Behalf of Themselves and All
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013-12-31 · Published · cited 15× · 995 F. Supp. 2d 1196; 2013 WL 7141522; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184761
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Remand, filed July 24, 2013 (Doc. 10)(“Motion to Remand”). The Court held a hearing on November 14, 2013. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant Safeway Insurance Company has established that Plaintiff Betty Ullman’s claims exceed the jurisdictional minimum f
Williams v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999-04-14 · Published · cited 8× · 736 So. 2d 699; 1999 WL 211903
736 So.2d 699 (1999) Denzil WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 97-2872. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 14, 1999. Rehearing Denied June 3, 1999. *700 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.<
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-03-20 · Published · cited 334× · 458 S.W.3d 502; 58 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 532; 2015 Tex. LEXIS 273; 2015 WL 1288373
Justice Boyd delivered the opinion of the Court. Texas law encourages parties to resolve disputes through arbitration, 1 but it will not force them to arbitrate unless they have agreed to that alternative. 2 If they have, or if they are equ
Ortiz v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005-01-25 · Published · cited 87× · 869 A.2d 285; 2005 Del. LEXIS 43; 2005 WL 277699
869 A.2d 285 (2005) Juan ORTIZ, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Nos. 494,2003, 528,2003. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: October 6, 2004. Decided: January 25, 2005. Lloyd A. Schmid, Jr., Esquire, Assistant Public Defender, Dover, Delaware, for appellant. Kim Ayvazian, Esquire (argued) and Joh
Cummings v. Malonepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993-07-19 · Published · cited 23× · 995 F.2d 817
995 F.2d 817 37 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 177 Rederick E. CUMMINGS, Appellee,v.Robert MALONE; Harry Lloyd, Cpt.; James Eberle, Defendants,Michael L. Plemmons; Scott L. Lawson, Appellants,Tony Lander; Steve Lingo, CO; George Adams; David Corum;Gary Blank; Phillip Vance; Arthur W. Dearixon; JamesBohannon; Richard Corser; Lewis Foxworth; William L.Rutledge; Louis Ferguson, Defendants.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010-11-24 · Published · cited 29× · 705 S.E.2d 223; 307 Ga. App. 419
705 S.E.2d 223 (2010) R & R INSULATION SERVICES, INC. v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY et al. R & R Insulation Services, Inc. et al. v. Royal Indemnity Company et al. Crane Company v. Royal Indemnity Company et al. Royal Indemnity Company et al. v. R & R Insulation Services, Inc. et al. Nos. A10A1537, A10A1538, A10A1539, A10A1540. Court of Appeals of Georgia.</
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1977-09-19 · Published · cited 6× · 436 F. Supp. 1376; 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13928
436 F.Supp. 1376 (1977) Donald E. PORTER, Conservator of Jane Ann Porter, and Donald E. Porter, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STEEL & WIRE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C 75-11. United States District Court, N. D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. September 19, 1977. *1377 *1378 Lloyd E. Humphr
Mitchell v. Skinnerpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1992-06-08 · Published · cited 2× · 796 F. Supp. 1464; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9342; 1992 WL 143716
796 F.Supp. 1464 (1992) Dr. C. Robert MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. Frank S. SKINNER, Jr., individually and as mayor of the City of Hoover; William Billingsley, individually and as a council member of the Hoover City Council; David Bradley, individually and as a member of the Hoover City Council; Barbara McCollum, individually and as a member of the Hoover City Council; Richard Linn, individually and as a member of the Hoover City Council; Sheila Trimm
Snyder v. Beampublic domain
Superior Court of Delaware · 1977-11-29 · Published · cited 3× · 380 A.2d 1374; 1977 Del. Super. LEXIS 91
380 A.2d 1374 (1977) Robert C. SNYDER, Administrator for the Estate of Ella Hearn, Plaintiff, v. Ronald R. BEAM, James R. Carr and Joseph McCaffery, doing business as Carr & McCaffrey and Carr & McCaffrey, a partnership, Carrie Hitchens and Anthony Hitchens, Defendants. Ethel Mae WEBB, Plaintiff, v. Ronald R. BEAM, Harold R. Beam, James R. Carr and Joseph McCaffrey, doing business as Carr & McCaffrey and Carr & McCaffr
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992-09-24 · Published · cited 17× · 802 F. Supp. 226; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15224; 1992 WL 246612
802 F.Supp. 226 (1992) Keith JACKSON, D.J. Dozier, Thomas Everett, Louis Lipps, Stephone Paige, Joseph Phillips, Webster Slaughter, Natu Tuatagaloa, Garin Veris and Leon White, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE; The Five Smiths, Inc.; Buffalo Bills, Inc.; Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc.; Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.; Cleveland Browns, Inc.; The Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd.; PDB Sports, Ltd.; The Detroit Lions, Inc.; The Green Bay Packer