Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Richard Lloyd Pritchett”
Pritchett & Burch, PLLC v. Boydpublic domain
Pritchett Burch, PLLC ("plaintiff") appeals from the trial court's judgment awarding summary judgment to Rebecca H. Boyd ("Boyd"), W.B. Long ("Long"), John Hunter Dailey ("Dailey"), and Olivia Dailey Alberti ("Alberti") (collectively, "defendants") on its breach of contract claim. Defendants' cross-appeal the award of summary judgment for plaintiff on its quantum meruit claim. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. I. Background In 199
Lloyd v. Jeffersonpublic domain
53 F.Supp.2d 643 (1999) William LLOYD and Kathaleen McCormick, Plaintiffs, v. Richard JEFFERSON, William McDaniel, and William Hill, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 97-307-GMS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 12, 1999. *644 *645 *646
Cummings v. Malonepublic domain
MAGILL, Circuit Judge. Michael Plemmons and Scott Lawson (collectively appellants) appeal from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding them liable for violating the Eighth Amendment rights of appellee Rederick Cummings and awarding nominal damages to Cummings. Appellants claim that the. district court erred (a) by improperly instructing the jury on the mental state necessary to prove an Eighth Amendment violation an
Valspar Corp. v. Shermanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Valspar Corporation’s Motion to Remand [Doc. No. 4], brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the motion and remands this case to Hennepin County District Court. II. BACKGROUN
Lott v. Pfizer, Inc.public domain
492 F.3d 789 (2007) Ricky LOTT, Gerald Sumner, Sandy Becker, and Mike Baldwin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PFIZER, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-3372. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued March 29, 2007. Decided June 25, 2007. *790 Aaron M. Zigler (argued), Korein Tillery, St. Louis, MO, for P
Helms v. Rafterpublic domain
853 F.Supp. 897 (1994) Kenneth HELMS, Plaintiff, v. William A. RAFTER, Defendant. Civ. No. 1:93cv75. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division. April 14, 1994. *898 *899 James Michael Lloyd and Robert E. Dungan, Asheville, NC, for plaintiff. Victoria Voight,
WILLIAM H. STEELE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1345This matter comes before the Court on defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 45) and plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. 47). Both Motions have been briefed and are now ripe. I. Nature of the Case. This dispute ari
Karst v. Shur-Co.public domain
■ZINTER, Justice. [¶ 1.] Richard and Susan Karst sued Shur Company and Wilson Trailer Company on negligence arid strict-liability causes of action.1 Karsts alleged defective design and improper warnings relating to Shur’s electric-tarp system that Wilson included on a grain trailer it sold to Richard. The circuit court granted summary judgment against Karsts on their failure-to-warri claims, and
The Plan Committee v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPpublic domain
335 B.R. 234 (2005) THE PLAN COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Defendant. Civ.A. No. 02-1487 RWR. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 31, 2005. *235 *236 *237 *238
Sims v. Allstate Insurance Co.public domain
NOTICE NO. 5-04-0525 Decision filed 05/31/06. The text of this decision may be changed or IN THE corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS disposition of the same. FIFTH DISTRICT ________________________________________________________________________ MICHAEL SIMS and TIFFANY SIMS, ) Appeal from the on Behalf of Themselves and All
Ullman v. Safeway Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Remand, filed July 24, 2013 (Doc. 10)(“Motion to Remand”). The Court held a hearing on November 14, 2013. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant Safeway Insurance Company has established that Plaintiff Betty Ullman’s claims exceed the jurisdictional minimum f
Williams v. Statepublic domain
736 So.2d 699 (1999) Denzil WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 97-2872. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 14, 1999. Rehearing Denied June 3, 1999. *700 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.<
G.T. Leach Builders, LLC v. Sapphire V.P., Lppublic domain
Justice Boyd delivered the opinion of the Court. Texas law encourages parties to resolve disputes through arbitration, 1 but it will not force them to arbitrate unless they have agreed to that alternative. 2 If they have, or if they are equ
Ortiz v. Statepublic domain
869 A.2d 285 (2005) Juan ORTIZ, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Nos. 494,2003, 528,2003. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: October 6, 2004. Decided: January 25, 2005. Lloyd A. Schmid, Jr., Esquire, Assistant Public Defender, Dover, Delaware, for appellant. Kim Ayvazian, Esquire (argued) and Joh
Cummings v. Malonepublic domain
995 F.2d 817 37 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 177 Rederick E. CUMMINGS, Appellee,v.Robert MALONE; Harry Lloyd, Cpt.; James Eberle, Defendants,Michael L. Plemmons; Scott L. Lawson, Appellants,Tony Lander; Steve Lingo, CO; George Adams; David Corum;Gary Blank; Phillip Vance; Arthur W. Dearixon; JamesBohannon; Richard Corser; Lewis Foxworth; William L.Rutledge; Louis Ferguson, Defendants.
705 S.E.2d 223 (2010) R & R INSULATION SERVICES, INC. v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY et al. R & R Insulation Services, Inc. et al. v. Royal Indemnity Company et al. Crane Company v. Royal Indemnity Company et al. Royal Indemnity Company et al. v. R & R Insulation Services, Inc. et al. Nos. A10A1537, A10A1538, A10A1539, A10A1540. Court of Appeals of Georgia.</
Porter v. United Steel & Wire Co.public domain
436 F.Supp. 1376 (1977) Donald E. PORTER, Conservator of Jane Ann Porter, and Donald E. Porter, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STEEL & WIRE COMPANY, Defendant. No. C 75-11. United States District Court, N. D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. September 19, 1977. *1377 *1378 Lloyd E. Humphr
Mitchell v. Skinnerpublic domain
796 F.Supp. 1464 (1992) Dr. C. Robert MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. Frank S. SKINNER, Jr., individually and as mayor of the City of Hoover; William Billingsley, individually and as a council member of the Hoover City Council; David Bradley, individually and as a member of the Hoover City Council; Barbara McCollum, individually and as a member of the Hoover City Council; Richard Linn, individually and as a member of the Hoover City Council; Sheila Trimm
Snyder v. Beampublic domain
380 A.2d 1374 (1977) Robert C. SNYDER, Administrator for the Estate of Ella Hearn, Plaintiff, v. Ronald R. BEAM, James R. Carr and Joseph McCaffery, doing business as Carr & McCaffrey and Carr & McCaffrey, a partnership, Carrie Hitchens and Anthony Hitchens, Defendants. Ethel Mae WEBB, Plaintiff, v. Ronald R. BEAM, Harold R. Beam, James R. Carr and Joseph McCaffrey, doing business as Carr & McCaffrey and Carr & McCaffr
Jackson v. National Football Leaguepublic domain
802 F.Supp. 226 (1992) Keith JACKSON, D.J. Dozier, Thomas Everett, Louis Lipps, Stephone Paige, Joseph Phillips, Webster Slaughter, Natu Tuatagaloa, Garin Veris and Leon White, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE; The Five Smiths, Inc.; Buffalo Bills, Inc.; Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc.; Cincinnati Bengals, Inc.; Cleveland Browns, Inc.; The Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd.; PDB Sports, Ltd.; The Detroit Lions, Inc.; The Green Bay Packer