Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Richard Junious”
In re Juniouspublic domain
By Judge Randall G. Johnson This is an appeal from the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court of the City of Richmond from an order entered June 9,1997, which awarded custody of Shailakia Junious ("Shailakia”) to her mother, Annie Junious (“junious”). The juvenile court's order was entered after a hearing on the petition for custody filed by Raymond Lee (“Lee”), ShailaMa’s father. Trial in Ms court was held on Septemb
Hill v. Yellowstone Co.public domain
July 28 2015 DA 15-0109 Case Number: DA 15-0109 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MT 210N RICHARD JUNIOUS HILL, SR., Petitioner and Appellant, v. YELLOWSTONE COUN
Marrero v. Camden County Board of Social Servicespublic domain
164 F.Supp.2d 455 (2001) Lizsandra MARRERO, Plaintiff, v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Clement Carney, Robert Ellis, Sandra Mayers, and Junious Coles and John Doe Decision Makers, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 00-3233(JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. October 4, 2001. *456 *457<
Holden v. Statepublic domain
305 A.2d 320 (1973) Richard E. HOLDEN et al., Defendants Below, Appellants, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. February 26, 1973. Reargument Denied March 29, 1973. Alfred J. Lindh, Wilmington, for Richard E. Holden and Junious R. Brown, Jr., defendants below, appellants. Angelo Falasca, Asst. Public Defender, Wilmingto
Guardianship of D.W.public domain
Opinion RUVOLO, P. J. I. INTRODUCTION Appellant D.W., proceeding in propria persona, appeals after respondent J.G. was appointed guardian of appellant’s six-year-old grandson, D.W. (the minor). She contends the court failed to comply with the inquiry and notice requirements of the federal Indian Child Welfar
Loud v. Statepublic domain
KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice, dissenting. This court should affirm the trial court’s March 13, 2009 judgment either because the trial court properly exercised its inherent power to correct or modify its prior judgment or because the trial court properly corrected clerical errors in the prior judgment. Background On February 13, 2009, the trial court signed a judgment adjudi
Michael C. Blair v. Statepublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10-00170-CR MICHAEL C. BLAIR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. FR-09-19662
Ryan v. Mary Ann Morse Healthcare Corp.public domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13726 JAMES M. RYAN, executor,1,2 vs. MARY ANN MORSE HEALTHCARE CORP.3 Middlesex
In Re BRpublic domain
176 Cal.App.4th 773 (2009) In re B.R. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. MARIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. G.R., Defendant and Appellant. No. A122581. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. August 13, 2009. *776 Caroline J. Todd, under a
14 Cal.Rptr.3d 798 (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 988 In re GERARDO A., Jr., et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. Fresno County Department of Children and Family Services, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gerardo A., Sr., Defendant and Appellant. No. F044674. Court of Appeal, Fifth District. June 24, 2004.
*777Opinion MARGULIES, J. This appeal presents the issue of whether the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.)1 (ICWA), applies when the minors’ presumed father in a juvenile dependency proceeding alleges that his adoptive father has one-quarter ancestry in a federally recognized Indian tribe. We
People v. Youngpublic domain
807 N.E.2d 1125 (2004) 347 Ill. App.3d 909 283 Ill.Dec. 284 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-99-0450. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. March 31, 2004. *1127 Robert A. Fisher Law Offices,
People v. Rodriguezpublic domain
839 N.E.2d 543 (2005) 362 Ill. App.3d 44 298 Ill.Dec. 220 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-04-3546. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. November 3, 2005. *545 Michael J. Pelletier, Depu
Romelia W. v. Edward L.public domain
127 Cal.Rptr.2d 860 (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 223 In re SUZANNA L., a Minor. Romelia W., Petitioner and Respondent, v. Edward L., Objector and Appellant; Alan W., Respondent. No. E031146. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two. December 10, 2002. *862 Monica Vogelmann, under appointment by the Cou
McClain v. Statepublic domain
383 So.2d 1146 (1980) Junious McCLAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 79-705. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. May 21, 1980. Rehearing Denied June 18, 1980. Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Polly M. Shull, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. *1147
Opinion KREMER, P. J. Introduction In this dependency case, Gina L. appeals the juvenile court’s six-month review order suspending her visits with her minor children Larissa and Michael G. and its subsequent order transferring jurisdiction to the Navajo Nation (Nation) pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.).2 As to the fi
People v. Youngpublic domain
JUSTICE REID delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial, Willie Young appeals his conviction of first degree murder resulting from the shooting of Jeffrey Sturghill. Young surrendered himself to police after a warrant had been issued for his arrest. Charged with violations of sections 9—1(a)(1) and (a)(2) o
In Re Larissa G.public domain
43 Cal.App.4th 505 (1996) 51 Cal. Rptr.2d 16 In re LARISSA G. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GINA L., Defendant and Appellant; NAVAJO NATION, Intervener and Respondent. Docket Nos. D024180, D024517. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.
Little Rock School v. Joshua Intervenorspublic domain
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. This case consolidates two appeals, both arising from the Little Rock School District’s request for unitary status. First, the Joshua Intervenors1 appeal from the District Court’s2 denial of their Motion for Recusal of District Judge and Vacating of Orders, Rulings, and Judgments. We review a district court’s denial of recusal for abuse o
Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. Stephensonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 50(a)(1) AND 50(a)(2) RAFEEDIE, District Judge. This case came before the Court for a jury trial on August 18, 1992, the Honorable Edward Rafeedie, United States District Court Judge presiding. Jerrold A. Fadem, Mark Schaeffer, Fadem and Douglas, for plaintiffs, Sinaloa Lake Owners Association. Gary Hamb