Cases

OPINION This interlocutory appeal arises from a trial court's certification of a class on behalf of all voters in Texas who are of Hispanic origin in a lawsuit related to legislative redistricting. By two points of error, appellants, Ann Richards and employees of the Texas Legislative Council (together referred to hereinafter as "the State"), assert that the trial court erred in certifying the class because the relief sought was moot and, alternatively, that the trial

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed November 16, 2015 (Doc. 36)("MSJ"). The Court held a hearing on September 26, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether a genuine dispute of material fact exists regarding Plaintiff Rudy Quiroz' claims for racial discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.

JUSTICE GOULD, opinion of the Court: ¶1 We address whether an employer who used asbestos materials in its workplace before 1970 had a duty to protect the public from off-site contact with employees who may have been carrying asbestos fibers on their work clothes. Such exposure is referred to as secondary, or take-home, asbestos exposure. We hold that the employer owed no duty to the p

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD DENT; JEREMY NEWBERRY; No. 19-16017 ROY GREEN; J. D. HILL; KEITH VAN HORNE; RON STONE; RON D.C. No. PRITCHARD; JAMES MCMAHON; 3:14-cv-02324- MARCELLUS WILEY, on behalf of WHA themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, a New York u

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD DENT; JEREMY NEWBERRY; No. 15-15143 ROY GREEN; J. D. HILL; KEITH VAN HORNE; RON STONE; RON D.C. No. PRITCHARD; JAMES MCMAHON; 3:14-cv-02324- MARCELLUS WILEY; JONATHAN REX WHA HADNOT, JR., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants,

ACCEPTED 03-14-00662-CV 3750163 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/13/2015 1:53:00 PM

JUSTICE GIANNIS delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial, defendant, Peter Quiroz, was found guilty of first degree murder, armed robbery and aggravated battery. He was sentenced to a concurrent term of 50 years for murder, 30 years for aggravated battery and 15 years for armed robbery. Defendant appeals pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 602. 134 Ill. 2d R. 602

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO AMANDA CAMPION AND JAMES CAMPION, AS CO-GUARDIANS OF ELI MENTZER, A MINOR, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF TUCSON, A BODY POLITIC, Defendant/Appellee. No. 2 CA-CV 2022-0046 Filed September 11, 2023

MEMORANDUM ** Kenneth Kilpatrick (“Kilpatrick”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against Officers Carlos Quiroz (“Quiroz”) and Robert Hernandez ■ (“Hernandez”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the district court. The district court properly granted summary judgment on Kilpatrick’s Sixth Amendment claim again

MEMORANDUM ** Kenneth Kilpatrick (“Kilpatrick”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against Officers Carlos Quiroz (“Quiroz”) and Robert Hernandez ■ (“Hernandez”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the district court. The district court properly granted summary judgment on Kilpatrick’s Sixth Amendment claim again

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Friedman, Chaney and Raphael Argued by videoconference RACHEL DODSON, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0518-24-4 JUDGE FRANK K. FRIEDMAN MARCH 18, 2025

RILEY, Chief Judge. Lexicon, Inc. built a battery of silos for Nu-Iron Unlimited in the West Indies. Months after completion, one of the silos collapsed because of faulty welding by Lexicon’s subcontractor, Damus Limited. The collapse caused millions of dollars in property damage. Lexicon sued ACE American Insurance Co. and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pe

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting: I dissent despite the tremendous effort of the panel majority in attempting to fathom what is, to me, an almost unfathomable record. I do so not because I disagree with the interpretation of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure (“F.R.A.P.”) 10 that the district court’s reconstruction of the record may be corrected only if it is “plainly unreasonable.” This is true even t

KING, Chief Judge: Richard Hicks, a federal prisoner, appeals his conviction and sentence for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) by possessing firearms and ammunition while he was subject to a domestic restraining order. He alleges that the district court improperly admitted evidence and testimony at trial, improperly sentenced him, and incorrectly concluded that his challenge to t

Matter of Ryhal v Annucci (2022 NY Slip Op 05117) Matter of Ryhal v Annucci 2022 NY Slip Op 05117 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 27 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: HYUNDAI AND KIA FUEL No. 15-56014 ECONOMY LITIGATION,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA PHOENIX UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 210, Petitioner, v. THE HON. JOAN M. SINCLAIR, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, Respondent, And CHRISTOPHER A. LUCERO, A MINOR CHILD, BY AND THROUGH HIS NATURAL FATHE

Bennett v State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 03499) Bennett v State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 03499 Decided on May 16, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State L

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CAL-AM PROPERTIES INC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. EDAIS ENGINEERING INC, Defendant/Appellee. No. CV-21-0129-PR Filed May 23, 2022 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable Timothy

*818ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Re: Dkt. Nos. 97, 180 MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs sued the County of Marin and individual jail staff (“Defendants”)