⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Richard J. LeBlanc”

Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009-08-04 · Published · cited 21× · 976 A.2d 750; 116 Conn. App. 267; 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 350
976 A.2d 750 (2009) 116 Conn.App. 267 Jeffrey J. LeBLANC et al. v. NEW ENGLAND RACEWAY, LLC, et al. No. 29724. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued March 16, 2009. Decided August 4, 2009. *754 Richard J. Pascal, Norwich, for the appellants (plaintiffs). Matthew D. Newman, Bridgepo
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994-05-24 · Published · cited 76× · 24 F.3d 340; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14687
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. In this opinion, we address sentencing issues which are consolidated from three appeals. In United States v. LeBlanc and United States v. Weinstein, the Government has appealed the district court’s decision to depart downward from the applicable Sentencing Guideline range. In both cases, the district court ruled tha
Stephens v. LeBlancpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004-05-14 · Published · cited 8× · 879 So. 2d 262; 2004 La. App. LEXIS 1253; 2004 WL 1078025
J^FITZSIMMONS, J. The issue on appeal is whether the defendant, Mr. Ashton R. LeBlanc, had automobile insurance coverage under a policy issued by defendant, U.S. Agencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. (U.S. Agencies). After the trial court found coverage, U.S. Agencies appealed. Based on an error of law, we reverse. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The insured, Mr. LeBlanc, pu
Richard v. LeBlancpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983-04-13 · Published · cited 0× · 430 So. 2d 343; 1983 La. App. LEXIS 8200
KNOLL, Judge. For the reasons stated in the companion case of Stephen R. Moore, Jr. versus E.M. LeBlanc, Jr., et al., 430 So.2d 339 (La. App. 3rd Cir.1983), in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this day, the judgment of the trial court is amended and recast to read as follows: It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment in favor of plaintiff, Russell R. Richard and
Leblanc v. Grelottipublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995-12-26 · Published · cited 0× · 910 F. Supp. 826; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19402; 1995 WL 771349
GERTNER, District Judge. Adopted. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION TO DISMISS REMAINING CLAIMS 1, 2 AND k (# 10) COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The above captioned matter is before the undersigned for a report and recommendation on the merits of the remaining claims (Grounds 1, 2 and 4) of Gregor
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993-05-14 · Published · cited 32× · 992 F.2d 394; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 11161; 1993 WL 150204
SELYA, Circuit Judge. We must answer today a question of first impression in this circuit and, of late, in the courts of appeals: Does a person’s status as a seaman in service of a ship necessarily end immediately upon termination of employment, thereby extinguishing a right to maintenance and cure which might otherwise be available under general maritime law? We think not. Beca
In Re LeBlanc Inc.public domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003-08-06 · Published · cited 3× · 299 B.R. 546; 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1008; 2003 WL 22026063
299 B.R. 546 (2003) In re LEBLANC INC., Debtor. No. 99-01033S. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. August 6, 2003. *547 *548 Dale Ardizzone, Glenayre Technologies, Inc., Charlotte, NC, Robert J. Bothe, Omaha, NE, Jeffrey W. Courter, Des Moines, IA, Michael J. Darlow, Perdue, B
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 769 So. 2d 683; 0 La.App. 5 Cir. 177; 2000 La. App. LEXIS 2149; 2000 WL 1335291
LCHEHARDY, Judge. In this personal injury case, both the plaintiff and a defendant appeal the trial court judgment rendered after trial. For the following reasons, we amend the judgment to reflect the trial court’s findings in its reasons for judgment and affirm as amended. This case arises out of a one-vehicle accident which occurred at approximately 6:00 a.m. on December 17, 1989, on U.S. Highway 61 in
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001-03-20 · Published · cited 34× · 433 Mass. 549; 744 N.E.2d 33; 2001 Mass. LEXIS 168
Greaney, J. A jury in the Superior Court convicted the defendant on two indictments charging murder in the first degree, for the bludgeoning deaths of two young women. The defendant appeals from his convictions, claiming that his statement to the police in which he confessed to the murders was involuntary due to his extreme emotional disturbance at the time, and so should have been suppressed. The defendant also asks that we exe
Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997-09-04 · Published · cited 6× · 944 P.2d 686; 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1754; 1997 Colo. App. LEXIS 204; 1997 WL 539530
944 P.2d 686 (1997) In re the MARRIAGE OF Mary M. LeBLANC, Appellee, and Richard J. LeBLANC, Appellant. No. 96CA0881. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. September 4, 1997. Litvak Litvak Mehrtens and Epstein, P.C., Ronald D. Litvak, David W. Foster, Denver, for Appellee. Thomas P. Malone & Associates, P.C., Thomas P. Malone, Denver, for Appellant.
LeBlanc v. Cahillpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998-08-11 · Published · cited 60× · 153 F.3d 134; 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1545; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 18542
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Senior Judge MICHAEL joined. OPINION HAMILTON, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we decide three issues of first impression in our circuit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. The first issue is whether ERIS
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-09-24 · Published · cited 128× · 904 F.3d 1314
JORDAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The federal filed rate doctrine, a creature of federal common law derived from various federal statutes, has been around since 1907. Despite its existence for over 100 years, Pennsylvania and Florida have so far not adopted it. The majority, without seeking guidance from the supreme courts of Pennsylvania or Florida, now confidently decrees that the federal filed
Michigan Supreme Court · 2019-06-07 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 7, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Michigan Supreme Court · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan March 28, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Michigan Supreme Court · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan March 28, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice 156317
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2016-10-19 · Published · cited 11× · 218 So. 3d 1; 2016 WL 6123579; 2016 La. LEXIS 2094
*3 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DISTRICT 7 GUIDRY, J. | ,We granted the claimant’s writ application to review the decision of the court of appeal that affirmed the workers’ compensation court judgment sustaining the emp
Walker v. LeBlancpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 111 So. 3d 1069; 2012 La.App. 1 Cir. 0764; 2012 WL 6643811; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1747
McCLENDON, J., dissents and assigns reasons. [, Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 966 D provides that “[t]he court shall hear and render judgment on the motion for summary judgment.” (Emphasis added.) The trial court, rather than setting the matter for hearing, entered its own order that provided,1 after certain briefing delays: “[T]his matter shall be under advisement. Th
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017-08-08 · Published · cited 2× · 167 A.3d 1015; 175 Conn. App. 362; 2017 WL 3382328; 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 324
BEACH, J. The defendant, Wayne N. LeBlanc, 1 appeals from the judgments of the trial court denying his motions to open the judgments of foreclosure by sale. He claims that the court erred in denying the relief sought in his motions to open. We affirm the judgments of the trial court. T
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 NY Slip Op 04236
Regional Municipality of York v LeBlanc (2022 NY Slip Op 04236) Regional Municipality of York v LeBlanc 2022 NY Slip Op 04236 Decided on July 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pur
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 NY Slip Op 04236
Regional Municipality of York v LeBlanc (2022 NY Slip Op 04236) Regional Municipality of York v LeBlanc 2022 NY Slip Op 04236 Decided on July 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pur