⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Richard J., Jr. Loftus”

District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013-10-28 · Published · cited 8× · 989 F. Supp. 2d 483; 92 Fed. R. Serv. 995; 2013 WL 5797727; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153984
ORDER PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on motion of Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as Receiver for Plantation Federal Bank (“Bank”), to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant also requests that the Court take judicial notice of six exhibits accompanying its M
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002-08-01 · Published · cited 88× · 298 F.3d 664; 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1837; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15428; 2002 WL 1767366
BAUER, Circuit Judge. The appellant, Ralph Licari, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his federal suit, which claims that the appellees violated Lieari’s substantive and/or procedural due process rights. We find that Licari’s claims are barred, and therefore AffiRm the decision of the district court. Background On May 17,
Cook v. Loftuspublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981-01-13 · Published · cited 5× · 414 N.E.2d 581; 1981 Ind. App. LEXIS 1207
414 N.E.2d 581 (1981) Sandra K. COOK, As Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Victor Chapelier, Deceased, and As Heir, Defendants-Appellants, v. Mary Jean LOFTUS, Jerry Shirley, Regina F. Richards, Ray T. Shirley, Robert L. Shirley and Geraldine Shirley, Plaintiffs-Appellees. No. 1-580A128. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. January 13, 1981. R
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974-10-10 · Published · cited 0× · 231 Pa. Super. 711; 326 A.2d 416; 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1399
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985-01-24 · Published · cited 13× · 753 F.2d 603; 1 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1614; 118 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2585; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28014; 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,972; 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1485
DUMBAULD, Senior District Judge. In order “to promote employment of older persons based on their ability rather than age” and to discourage the common practice of “setting of arbitrary age limits regardless of potential for job performance” [29 U.S.C. § 621], Congress by the Act of December 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 603, 29 U.S.C. § 623(a) p
Davis v. Loftuspublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002-09-09 · Published · cited 14× · 778 N.E.2d 1144; 334 Ill. App. 3d 761; 268 Ill. Dec. 522
778 N.E.2d 1144 (2002) 334 Ill. App.3d 761 268 Ill.Dec. 522 Terry A. DAVIS, Tinley Park Partners 3, Edgecorp I, Inc., Tad Associates Inc., Southwest Construction Corporation, David G. Tillinghast, and Edgewater Walk Apartments, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. P. Michael LOFTUS, Donald F. Engel, Gottlieb & Schwartz, an Illinois Partnership, Keith R. Abrams, Roy L. Bernstein, Stephen R. Chesler, Barry J
Davis v. Loftuspublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DIVISION September 9, 2002 Nos. 1-00-1772, 1-00-2197 (Cons.) TERRY A. DAVIS, TINLEY PARK PARTNERS 3, ) Appeal from the EDGECORP I, INC., TAD ASSOCIATES INC., ) Circuit Court of SOUTHWEST CONSTRU
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
."` IN THE \/\O\ \L\D[.V| "6§ COURT OE` CRIMIAL APPEALS AUSTIN/ TEXAS Ex parte § Valentin Moreno, Jr. § Writ No. 49,474-05 . RECEIVED lN Appllcant § CouRT oF chM\NAL APPEALS APPLICANT'S FINAL AMENDMENTS TO APPLICANTION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS lEC 04 2015 TO THE MOST HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: Comes Now, Valentin Moreno, Jr., Applicant, pro se in the above referenced ' Abel Acosta, C|erk cause and respectfully files, 'Applicant's Final Amendments To Application For Writ Of
Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009-02-27 · Published · cited 3× · 672 S.E.2d 837; 277 Va. 359; 2009 Va. LEXIS 37
672 S.E.2d 837 (2009) Jon LURIA, et al. v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WESTBRIAR CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION. Record No. 080515. Supreme Court of Virginia. February 27, 2009. Michael S. Dingman (Robert M. Diamond; Richard D. Kelley; Reed Smith LLP, on brief), Falls Church, for appellants. *838 Robert H.J. Loftus (McCandl
Loftus v. Haydenpublic domain
Superior Court of Delaware · 1977-09-23 · Published · cited 3× · 379 A.2d 1136; 1977 Del. Super. LEXIS 81
379 A.2d 1136 (1977) Mildred LOFTUS and Donald A. Loftus, her husband, Plaintiffs, v. Richard C. HAYDEN, M.D. and the Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendants. Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted September 2, 1977. Decided September 23, 1977. C. Waggaman Berl, Jr., Wilmington, for plaintiffs. War
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988-09-21 · Published · cited 45× · 855 F.2d 1256
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Donna Branion died on December 22, 1967. She was strangled and shot at least four times. She was not molested; there were no signs of forced entry into the apartment, from which nothing was stolen. This led the police to doubt that a stranger *1258 was responsible. A j
Loftus v. Haydenpublic domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 1978-08-18 · Published · cited 21× · 391 A.2d 749; 1978 Del. LEXIS 792
391 A.2d 749 (1978) Mildred LOFTUS and Donald A. Loftus, her husband, Plaintiffs below, Appellants, v. Richard C. HAYDEN, M.D., Defendant below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted June 20, 1978. Decided August 18, 1978. C. Waggaman Berl, Jr., Wilmington, for plaintiffs below, appellants. Warren B. Burt of Prickett, Ward, Burt & Sanders, Wilmin
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 332 Ill. App. 389; 75 N.E.2d 408; 1947 Ill. App. LEXIS 350
Mr. Justice Feinberg delivered the opinion of the court. Plaintiff filed his petition for mandamus in the circuit court against the defendants, as members of the board of trustees of the police pension fund of Calumet city, and against the treasurer and city clerk of said city. Upon a hearing without a jury, the court awarded the writ of mandamus, from which the defendants a
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-07-15 · Published · cited 47× · 758 F.3d 676; 2014 WL 3442515; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13485
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: In this case, Plaintiffs-Appellants have sued Defendants-Appellees in a private action for securities fraud under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. Accordingly, Plaintiffs-Appellants are obliged under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLR
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-03-03 · Published · cited 2× · 168 F. Supp. 3d 1033; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27275; 2016 WL 826396
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Andrea R. Wood, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are former employees of Defendants Infinium Capital Holdings, LLC (“Infinium Holdings”) and Infinium Capital Management, LLC (“Infinium,” and along with Infinium Holdings, “Infinium Defendants”). Plaintiffs had loaned money to the Infinium Defendants and subsequently participated in what was known as the “Infinium Empl
State v. Barberpublic domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 169 N.J. Super. 26; 404 A.2d 46; 1979 N.J. Super. LEXIS 792
Loftus, J. S. C. This is a criminal case involving alleged violations of the Cigarette Tax Act, N. J. S. A. 54:40A-1 et seq. A motion has been made by defendants Paul Barber and David Robinson to dismiss the indictment or, in the alternative, for suppression of intercepted wire communications regarding alleged violations of the Cigarette Tax Act, testimony relating to surveillance of a 1974 Dodge van, New Jersey
State v. Clevelandpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2018-08-14 · Published · cited 9× · 423 P.3d 1074; 2018 MT 199
Justice Ingrid Gustafson delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Richard Lane Cleveland, Jr. (Cleveland) appeals from the October 3, 2016 Sentence & Judgment entered by the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Carbon County. We reverse and remand for amendment of the Judgment consistent with this Opinion. ¶ 2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows: 1. Whether the District Court
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 457 F. Supp. 2d 104; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76626
457 F.Supp.2d 104 (2006) GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY as subrogee of National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, CNA Commercial Insurance Company as subrogee of Group Benefit Strategies, and National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, v. PAINO ASSOCIATES, and Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Caliber One Indemnity Co., Third-Party Defendant, v. Transcore, Inc., Defendant/Third-Part
California Court of Appeal · 2010-05-26 · Published · cited 5× · 184 Cal. App. 4th 1490; 110 Cal. Rptr. 3d 117; 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 754
184 Cal.App.4th 1490 (2010) 110 Cal.Rptr.3d 117 In re ELECTRIC REFUND CASES. Nos. B206881, B207189, B208946. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. May 26, 2010. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*] *1492 Brune & Richard, Laurie Edelstein, Randall T. Kim; S
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008-05-20 · Published · cited 20× · 526 F.3d 770; 381 U.S. App. D.C. 201; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10710; 2008 WL 2095837
526 F.3d 770 (2008) BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and United States of America, Respondents Western Coal Traffic League, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 06-1372, 06-1373, 06-1374, 06-1398, 06-1399, 06-1401, 06-1404, 06-1409, 06-1421. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued February 5, 2008. Decided M