Cases

RULING RE: LOSS CALCULATION AND OTHER SENTENCING GUIDELINE § 2B1.1 ISSUES JANET C. HALL, District Judge. On May 21, 2014, defendants David Bryson (“Bryson”), Bart Gutekunst (“Gute-kunst”), and Richard Pereira (“Pereira”) pled guilty to Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment, conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of section 371 of title 18 of the United States Code. The court assumes familia

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING BRYSON, Circuit Judge. This case involves a takings claim by low-income housing providers who were barred by statute from prepaying their mortgages and leaving the federal low-income housing program. In our initial opinion, we set forth a method for the trial court to value the taking as applied to two of the plaintiffs (St. And

BRYSON, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Federal Claims in a takings case. Independence Park Apartments v. United States, 61 Fed.Cl. 692 (2004). This case has had an extended history and now reaches this court for the fourth time. In the immediately preceding appeal to this court, Cienega Gardens v. United States,

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON. KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: The petitioners, Husqvarna AB et al. (Husqvarna), seek review of the Phase 2 Emission Standards for New Nonroad Spark-Ignition Handheld Engines promulgated by the respondent, the U.S. Environmental Protecti

DYK, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a coalition of farmers, seed sellers, and agricultural organizations, sought declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity with respect to twenty-three patents owned by Monsanto Co. and Monsanto Technology, LLC (collectively, “Monsanto”). The district court concluded that there was no justiciable case or controversy and dismissed for

21-1014 Bugliotti v. Republic of Argentina United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2021 Argued: June 7, 2022 Decided: May 2, 2023 No. 21-1014 EUCLIDES BARTOLOMÉ BUGLIOTTI, MARIA

22-969-cv Callahan v. County of Suffolk In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 No. 22-969 CHRISTOPHER CALLAHAN, Individually and as Administrator D.B.N. of the Estate of Kevin Callahan, Plaintiff-Appellant,

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the appeal be and hereby is DISMISSED. Gerald Sanchez appeals from the district court’s denial of his requests for downward departures based on aberrant behavior and extraordinary rehabilitation. Because we have no authority to review the court’s exercise of discretion, we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND

2020 UT App 155 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF J.R.H., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. J.R.H., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190419-CA Filed November 13, 2020

BRYSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the result. I agree with the court that summary judgment should not have been granted in this case, but I disagree with the court’s analysis in one respect. I therefore concur in the result with regard to the summary judgment issue. In granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the dist

550 F.3d 1368 (2008) CONNER BROS. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Pete GEREN, Secretary of the Army, Appellee. No. 2008-1188. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 31, 2008. *1370 Joseph C. Staak, Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, of Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Lauren S. Moore, Trial Att

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. Gil Santiago Cano, Hector Hernandez Za-vala, Juan Hernandez Zavala, Omar Hernandez Zavala, Aristeo Basurto, Carlos Rodriguez Herrera, Leonardo Juarez, Saul Isidro, Aboubacar Gouem, and Anatole Yameogo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, bring this action against DPNY, Inc. d/b/a Domino’s Pizza, BMW

OPINION OF THE COURT Rosenblatt, J. P. The case before us raises important considerations as to the role and the discretion of the District Attorney in presenting cases to the Grand Jury. The People are appealing from the court’s order dismissing the indictment against the defendant (see, CPL 450.20 [1]). The Supreme Court dismissed the indictment based on its view that the pro

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT TIRE ENGINEERING AND  DISTRIBUTION, LLC, d/b/a Alpha Tyre Systems, d/b/a Alpha Mining Systems, a Florida Limited Liability Corporation; JORDAN FISHMAN, an individual; BEARCAT TIRE ARL, LLC, d/b/a Alpha Tire Systems, d/b/a Alpha Mining Systems, a Florida Limited Liability Company; BCATCO A.R.L., INCORPORATED, a Jersey Channels Islands Corporation, Plaintiffs-Ap

24-2950 Bugliotti v. The Republic of Argentina In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term, 2025 No. 24-2950 Euclides Bartolome Bugliotti, Maria Cristina De Biasi, Roxana Ines Rojas, Denise Lauret, Maria Carla Gonano, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

275 Neb. 173 RICHARd A. DEWESTER, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LINDSEY DEWESTER, DECEASED, APPELLANT, v. KYLE W. WATKINS, AN INDIVIDUAL, APPELLEE. No. S-06-230. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed February 29, 2008. Andrew J. Wilson and Klie A. Wolf, of Walentine, O'Toole, McQuillan & Gordon, for appellant. Martin J. Troshynski, of Ruff, Lindemei

382 F.3d 1340 Richard C. LA VAN, Carmen Lullo, Ronald S. Kraar, Donald Bialon, and James Skozek, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, andFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plantiff,v.UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-5140. No. 03-5149. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 3, 2004.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN, in which Chief Judge RADER and Circuit Judges LOURIE, BRYSON, LINN, and MOORE join. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA, in which Circuit Judges DYK, PROST, and O’MALLEY join. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This suit is brought on behalf of shareholders of the Meritor Savings Bank, formerly the Philadelphia Savings Fund Society. The cause originat

*1092MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants the Minnesota Department of Human Services (“DHS”) and DHS Commissioner Emily Johnson Piper (“Commissioner Johnson Piper”) (collectively, “Defendants”). (

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-5083 NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. Jay E. Silberg, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of Washington, DC, argued fo