Cases

191 S.W.3d 633 (2006) GAINSCO COMPANIES, H & H Auto & Trailer Sales, and David Holder Appellants v. Darrell GENTRY, as Guardian for Joshua Gentry; Joe Allen Booth, as Guardian for Jonathan Booth, a Minor; and Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance Company Appellees No. 2004-SC-0276-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. March 23, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 15, 2006.</

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 7, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 4, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Judgment rendered October 1, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,453-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** JOHN STEWART GENTRY

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. The Gentry Gallery appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts holding that the Berkline Corporation does not infringe U.S. Patent 5,064,244, and declining to award attorney fees for Gentry’s defense to Berk-line’s assertion that the patent was unenforceable. See Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. Berkli

COURT OF APPEALS REBECA C. MARTINEZ FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT CHIEF JUSTICE CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ 300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200 LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037 TELEPHONE IRENE RIOS WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX

(2008) Jonathan Lee GENTRY, Petitioner, v. Stephen SINCLAIR, Respondent. Case No. C99-0289L. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. September 15, 2008. ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PETITIONER'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND ORDER DENYING AMENDED HABEAS PETITION ROBERT S. LASNIK, Distri

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT DAVID SHINN, Director, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT DAVID SHINN, Director, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THEODORE WASHINGTON, No. 05-99009 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-95-02460-JAT DAVID SHINN, Director, ORDER AND Respondent-Appellee. AMENDED OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dist

510 P.2d 784 (1973) ELITE CLEANERS AND TAILORS, INC., a Wyoming corporation, and Richard L. Martin, Appellants (Defendants below), v. William S. GENTRY, by his next friend, Mary Lynn Gentry, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 4166. Supreme Court of Wyoming. June 8, 1973. *785 Carl L. Lathrop, and David D. Uchner, Lathrop, Uchner &am;

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TRACY ALLEN HAMPTON, AKA No. 19-99005 Tracy A. Hampton, D.C. No. 2:14-cv- Petitioner-Appellant, 02504-ROS v. OPINION DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; RON CREDIO, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal f

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 27, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

10/14/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 12, 2022 Session Heard at Austin Peay State University1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID WAYNE EADY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2018-B-952 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge ___________

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 260 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-21-410 Opinion Delivered May 25, 2022 SHARON BAKER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE HOT SPRING COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.

NUMBER 13-16-00701-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG DAVID MALCOLM STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 36th District Court

NUMBER 13-16-00701-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG DAVID MALCOLM STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 36th District Court

Utter, J. (dissenting) — The majority of this court approves the admission of unreliable evidence in criminal cases. To the extent it does so, it invites freeing those who may be guilty and convicting those who may be innocent. Both the National Academy of Sciences Report, on which this court relied in a previous case, and the testimony of the scientists at the Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 34 A.L.R. 145 (D.C. Cir.

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by email at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Richard Sanson, Jean Sanson, FILED and Cecilia Sanson April 12, 2016 Defendants Below, Petitioners RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT