Cases

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 201 CAF 14-01538 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD C. KIRKPATRICK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JESSICA LYNN KIRKPATRICK, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ----------------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF JESSICA LYNN KIRKPATRICK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 520 CAF 13-00075 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF JESSICA LYNN KIRKPATRICK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD C. KIRKPATRICK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.) DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY R. LOVALLO, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESP

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 521 CAF 13-00076 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF JESSICA LYNN KIRKPATRICK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD C. KIRKPATRICK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 3.) DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY R. LOVALLO, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESP

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 519 CAF 13-00074 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF JESSICA LYNN KIRKPATRICK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD C. KIRKPATRICK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.) DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY R. LOVALLO, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDEN

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered July 22, 2014 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, dismissed the petition of Jessica Lynn Kirkpatrick and *1696granted in part the petition of Richard C. Kirkpatrick to modify a prior court order. It is hereby ordered that the order so appeale

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered July 22, 2014 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, dismissed the petition of Jessica Lynn Kirkpatrick and *1696granted in part the petition of Richard C. Kirkpatrick to modify a prior court order. It is hereby ordered that the order so appeale

— Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered December 13, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, granted in part the petition for modification of a prior visitation and custody order. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Same memorandum as in Matter of Kirkpatrick v Kirkpatrick

— Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered December 13, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, granted in part the petition for modification of a prior visitation and custody order. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. Same memorandum as in Matter of Kirkpatrick v Kirkpatrick

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered December 13, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In these consolidated appeals, petitioner mother appeals from three orders resolving three petitions that she filed ag

— Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered December 13, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Matter of Kirkpatrick v Kirkpatrick (117 AD3d 1575 [2014]). Present — Centra, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered December 13, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In these consolidated appeals, petitioner mother appeals from three orders resolving three petitions that she filed ag

— Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered December 13, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Matter of Kirkpatrick v Kirkpatrick (117 AD3d 1575 [2014]). Present — Centra, J.

833 A.2d 536 (2003) 377 Md. 335 Harold M. MILLER, Jr., et ux. v. Roger M. KIRKPATRICK, et al. No. 2, Sept. Term, 2003. Court of Appeals of Maryland. October 9, 2003. *539 Michael J. Jacobs (Melanie J. Barney, Easton, on brief), for petitioners. Jack L. B. Gohn, Baltimore, Alvi C. Monshower, Jr., Ric

GOSHORN, Judge. Appellants Tom and Karen Kirkpatrick raise two issues in this appeal from a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding that Dr. Wolford did not negligently cause the death of the Kirkpatricks’ newborn son. We find that one issue merits discussion but affirm. Appellants argue that the trial court erred in determining that certain medical texts were authoritative for use in cr

BAER, District Judge. Richard C. Breeden is trustee of the Bennett Funding Group, Inc. (hereinafter “BFG”), a defunct company that was used as the vehicle for a Ponzi scheme. Breeden sued, inter alia, the company’s lawyers and an accounting firm on the theory that they should have detected the fraud. The trustee alleges that Arthur Anderson (hereinafter “AA”) was negligent in (1) issuing “clean” opinions for BFG’s 1

TACHA, Chief Judge. Petitioners appeal the district court’s dismissal of their habeas corpus petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Although we hold that we do have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, we dismiss because Petitioners fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. I. Background A. Factual Backgro

SUBSTITUTE OPINION Marc W. Brown, Justice Appellants, Richard Fawcett, Kevin Roberts, Darren Pitts, George Lilliard, Christopher Matthews, Armando Florido, David Vukovic, Ken Patrick, James Lemons, Douglas Hissong, and Danny Fuller, Sr., bring an interlocutory appeal 1 of the trial court’s order

268 B.R. 704 (2001) Richard C. BREEDEN, Trustee of the Bennett Funding Group, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART, LLP, et al., Defendants. Richard C. Breeden, Trustee of the Bennett Funding Group, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robinson, St. John & Wayne, et al., Defendants. Richard C. Breeden, Trustee of the Bennett Funding Group, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Storch & Brenner, LLP, et al., Defen

695 F.Supp.2d 225 (2010) ANTHONY C. MENGINE LAW, INC., d/b/a Chiurazzi & Mengine, LLC; and Charlotte Hagans, Plaintiffs, v. HEALTHPORT, Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-1109. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. February 13, 2010. *226 James M. Pietz, Pietz Law Office, Paul A. Lagnese, Berger & Lagnese, Pittsbur

OPINION AND ORDER SESSIONS, District Judge. Plaintiffs in this lawsuit against Defendant Merit Behavioral Care Corporation (“Merit”), a managed behavioral health organization, have moved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) to vacate this Court’s opinion filed May 19, 2000 which granted summary judgment to Merit and closed the case. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs’ motions (papers 167 and 168)