Cases

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2008 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2008. In The Fourteenth Court of

152 F.3d 950 332 U.S.App.D.C. 1 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Richard Paul SPINNER, III, Appellant. No. 97-3061. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued April 22, 1998.Decided July 28, 1998.Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1998. A.J. Kramer, Fed

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 11-0447 444444444444 LEE C. RITCHIE, ET AL., PETITIONER, v. ANN CALDWELL RUPE, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE DALLAS GORDON RUPE, III 1995 FAMILY TRUST, RESPONDENT 44444444444444444444

DECISION. *Page 2 {¶ 1} This is a case of alleged workplace discrimination. But if we were to decide that the isolated and indirect incidents here amounted to discrimination, no employer could run a business. The employer reacted promptly and properly to the incidents in question. The trial court was correct in granting summary judgment, and we affirm. {¶

OPINION MILLER, Judge: ¶ 1 Josiah Austin appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to compel arbitration. For the following reasons, we affirm. Factual and Procedural Background ¶ 2 In reviewing a denial of a motion to compel arbitration, we must defer to the trial court’s factual finding

Judge Rosemary Ledet | ¶ This is an insurance coverage dispute arising out of a claim under a Motor Truck Cargo Liability Policy. From the trial court’s judgment granting the motion for-summary judgment filed by the defendant-insurer, OOIDA Risk Retention Group, Inc. (“OOIDA”), the plaintiff, Roadrunner Transportation Systems (“Roadrunner”), appeals. The defendant-insured, Anita Brown, d/b/a Browns Transport (“Ms. Brown”),

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01653-COA VICTORIA WILBOURN APPELLANT/ CROSS-APPELLEE v. RICHARD WILBOURN, III APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/1

713 S.E.2d 246 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Nathaniel BROWN, Defendant. No. COA10-920. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 19, 2011. *247 Attorney General, Roy A. Cooper, III, by Scott K. Beaver, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Richard E. Jester, Louisburg, for defendant-appellant. STROU

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. LThe plaintiff, Melba Margaret Sehweg-mann Brown, appeals the trial court’s judgment granting an exception of per-emption 1 in favor of the defendants, Schonekas, Winsberg, Evans & McGoey, L.L.C., Kyle Schonekas, Mark D. Wins-berg, and Elisa Mills (collectively, “Defendant Attorneys”), finding that her claim for malpractice had been perempted. For the following reas

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: *1138 This fraudulent-transfer case, like many such cases, is a suit about a suit. In the first suit, Plaintiffs obtained a judgment in federal district court in Kentucky for breach of a partnership contract. But when Plaintiffs tried to collect, they discovered t

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2343 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Richard Ladavid Brown, Jr., also known as Richard Lee David Brown, also known

68 So.3d 758 (2011) Annie BROWN, Appellant v. Kim YATES, Appellee. No. 2009-CA-02032-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. August 16, 2011. Richard C. Roberts III, Jackson, David Bridges, Brandon, attorneys for appellant. J. Edward Rainer, Gary Lee Williams, Brandon, attorneys for appellee. Before IRVING, P.J., BARNES and MAXWELL, JJ. IRVING, P.

649 F.3d 193 (2011) Joseph BROWN, Appellant v. Michael ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration c/o General Counsel. No. 10-3435. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) June 21, 2011. Opinion filed: July 6, 2011. *194 Karen K. Weisbord, Esq., Ric

REILLY, J.1 ¶ 1. Sovereign immunity bars suit against the State of Wisconsin unless the legislature has clearly and expressly consented to be sued. Hoops Enterprises, III, LLC filed a lawsuit against the State in an action seeking relief due to damage allegedly caused by roadwork overseen by the Department of Transportation (DOT). The State moved to dismiss on grounds of sovereign immunity. The circui

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District RICHARD BROWN, ET AL., ) ) Appellants, ) WD84312 ) v. ) OPINION FIL

PER CURIAM. ¶ 1. This is a review of an unpublished opinion of the court of appeals that affirmed in part and reversed in part an order of the circuit court. 1 Three issues are presented for review: *452 ¶ 2. First, should

::rli rH£ ~-u.Hmo ~5 c.oultf ·. ( ·~. of' A~, AvsrrH, orv.ISJlU ~ IU>kJkl Qtl.AWtt V5.

288 S.W.3d 620 (2008) John L. POFF, Appellant, v. Harold Ray BROWN, Claude C. Brown and Estate of Thelma Payton, Deceased, Appellees. No. 08-305. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 23, 2008. *621 Richard H. Mays Law Firm, by: Richard H. Mays, Heber Springs, for appellant. Tilley & Thomas, by: R. Bryan Tilley and Albert

ELMORE, Judge. Dr. Darrell James Brown (defendant) appeals from 1) an order entered 29 August 2012 granting summary judgment in favor of Halifax Regional Medical Center, Inc. (plaintiff) and denying his motion for summary judgment and 2) an order entered 29 August 2012 granting a motion to dismiss and motion to remove in favor of Smith Church Obstertrics & Gynecology, PC. and Dr. Richard Minielly. After careful considerati

WILLIAMS, J. _JjThe plaintiffs, Samuel R. Guy and Janet M. Guy, appeal a district court judgment denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS The plaintiffs are the owners of a 140-acre tract of immovable property located, in DeSoto Parish.1 On March 23,