Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Richard C Howell and Linda L. Howell”
Flanders v. E. W. Howell Co., LLCpublic domain
Flanders v E. W. Howell Co., LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 02276) Flanders v E. W. Howell Co., LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 02276 Decided on April 14, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B
Block v. Howellpublic domain
346 N.W.2d 441 (1984) Alvin BLOCK and Margaret Block, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Henry HOWELL, Hazel Howell; Vance E. Miller, Jr., Marilyn A. Schornack; Judson O. Mabee; Leonard E. Garness, Sheila Garness; John R. Wheeting; Olive Justin Frederickson, L. Lewis Feuerstein, Delores E. Feuerstein; Gary W. Gange, Sally Gange, Linda L. Gange; Wilbur E. Gange, Myrtle A. Gange; W.J. Rivett, Elene M. Rivett; Dr. Robert Randall; Robert W. Burnette, Mary
Howell v. North Central Collegepublic domain
331 F.Supp.2d 660 (2004) Danielle HOWELL, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CENTRAL COLLEGE, The Trustees of North Central College, by and through its Chairman, Richard Norenberg, Walter Johnson, Linda Olson, and Karen Seremet, Defendants. No. 02 C 7163. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 17, 2004. *661 Kent
MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (D.I.17) filed on December 23, 2013. The motion is fully briefed (D.I. 18, 21 & 26) and oral argument was held on May 23, 2014. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the Defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts I-YI and VIII, with leave to amend. I. BACKGR
Howell v. North Central Collegepublic domain
320 F.Supp.2d 717 (2004) Danielle HOWELL, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CENTRAL COLLEGE, the Trustees of North Central College, by and Through its Chairman, Richard Norenberg, Walter Johnson, Linda Olson, Karen Seremet, Defendant. No. 02 C 7163. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 2, 2004. *718 Kent D. Sinso
MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDREWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Universal’s First Amended and Supplemental Complaint. (D.I.44). The motion has been fully briefed (D.I.45, 48, 49). The Court heard oral argument. (D.I.54). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND<
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-18-00218-CV TROY M. FRANKS AND EUDORA FRANKS, Appellants/Appellees v. WESLEY RODERICK HOVEY AND LINDA MARIE HOVEY, Appellees/Appellants From the 278th District Court Leon County, Texas
Bell & Howell: Mamiya Co. v. Masel Supply Co. Corp.public domain
PIERCE, Circuit Judge: Masel Supply Co. Corp. (Masel) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Edward R. Neaher, Judge, entered October 1,1982, granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Bell & Howell: Mamiya Co. (BHMC) 1 and enjoining Masel
Imhoff Investment, L.L.C. v. Alfoccino, Inc.public domain
OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.. Plaintiff Avio, Inc. 1 alleges that Defendant Alfoccino violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C), (b)(3), by hiring Business to Business Solutions (B2B) to send unsolicited facsimile advertisements to Avio and a class of s
Beroth Oil Co. v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Linda White v. Marshall & Ilsley Corporationpublic domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. When financier J. Pierpont Morgan was asked what the stock market would do, he answered, according to Wall Street legend, “It will fluctuate.” Sometimes it fluctuates a lot, as the sponsor of the retirement savings plan in this case understood well. This case is about how federal law applies to such fluctuations in the value of an employee stock owners
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DESERT LAND LOAN ACQUISITION, No. 76934 LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; DESERT LAND, LLC, A NEBADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; HOWARD BULLOCH, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID GAFFIN, AN INDIVIDUAL; THE HOWARD AND CRISTI BULLOCH FAMILY TRUST DATED 09/14/1995; ME HOWA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DESERT LAND LOAN ACQUISITION, No. 76934 LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; DESERT LAND, LLC, A NEBADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; HOWARD BULLOCH, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID GAFFIN, AN INDIVIDUAL; THE HOWARD AND CRISTI BULLOCH FAMILY TRUST DATED 09/14/1995; ME HOWA
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Perez v. C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge Thirteen construction workers bring this action against a first-tier subcontractor and its owners, C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc. (“CRC”), Carlos R. Calderon and Ana P. Calderon (collectively, the “CRC defendants”), a second-tier subcontractor and its o
State of Iowa v. Ronald Richard Pagliaipublic domain
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 24–0353 Submitted October 8, 2025—Filed January 9, 2026 State of Iowa, Appellee, vs. Ronald Richard Pagliai, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Tabitha Turner, district associate ju
Johnson v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.public domain
453 S.E.2d 908 (1995) Duke K. JOHNSON and Joan M. Johnson, Richard H. and Dana Benson Brant, Joel M. and Deborah B. Brockman, Ray Collins, George F. and Connie S. Crane, Thomas J. and Kathryn D. Cunningham, Margaret S. Davenport, Tracy Woodrow, Jr. and Loyce V. Dees, William J. and Sara T. Dunn, Edgar N. and Frances Patricia Elliott, Vivian Gamble, Louis F. and Patricia F. Gantt, Lawrence L. and Princess A. Gentry, Danny B. and Marilyn M. Grey, Thomas G.
Matera v. M.G.C.C. Group, Inc.public domain
LOCASCIO, J.S.C. The within opinion supersedes this court’s November 9, 2007, oral decision in the instant matter. The issue, of first impression, arising from plaintiffs’ within motion, is whether a viable consumer fraud cause of action lies where there is no contact between the parties but only between defendant Bank of America’s alleged violation of the Consumer Fraud Act and plaintiffs’ alleged ascertain
in Re Lorie A. Pfeil and Pfeil Fitness, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00433-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/12/2015 10:21:11 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE