Cases

(2008) Clark S. CHENEY, Plaintiff, v. IPD ANALYTICS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1044 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 20, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Plaintiff Clark Cheney brings this action against his former employer IPD Analytics, LLC ("IPD" or "the Com

230 F.Supp.2d 51 (2002) David M. WALKER, Comptroller General of the United States, Plaintiff, v. Richard B. CHENEY, Vice President of the United States and Chair, National Energy Policy Development Group, Defendant. No. CIV.A.02-0340 JDB. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 9, 2002. As Amended December 13, 2002.

593 F.Supp.2d 194 (2009) CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard B. CHENEY, Vice President of the United States, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1548 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 19, 2009. *198 Anne L. Weismann, Citizens for Responsibility

577 F.Supp.2d 328 (2008) CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard B. CHENEY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1548 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 20, 2008. *330 Anne L. Weismann, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Washingto

580 F.Supp.2d 168 (2008) CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard B. CHENEY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1548 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 5, 2008. *170 Anne L. Weismann, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, David L. Sob

346 S.W.3d 713 (2011) The STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. Jeffery Porter ALLEN, Appellee. No. 03-09-00164-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. February 16, 2011. Rehearing Overruled June 9, 2011. Discretionary Review Refused September 14, 2011. *714 Richard E. Wetzel, Austin, TX, for Appellant.</

749 F.Supp.2d 315 (2010) Monique D. ALMY, Chapter 7 Trustee For the Bankruptcy Estate of Bionicare Medical Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civil Action No. RDB-08-1245. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 3, 2010. Opinion on Reconsideration October

[Cite as State ex rel. Donahue v. Allen Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2021-Ohio-3292.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE EX REL., ALICE DONAHUE, ET AL., PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, CASE NO. 1-21-28 v. THE ALLEN COUNTY OHIO, BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL., OPINION RESPO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 08-1548 (CKK) v. RICHARD B. CHENEY, Vice President of the United States, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 19, 2009)

PER CURIAM. ¶ 1. The members of the court disagree as to the disposition of petitioner Aaron Antonio Allen's motions for the recusal of Justice Michael J. Gableman citing the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution; Article I, Sections 1 and 8 of the Wisconsin Constitution; and Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(g). *373¶ 2. On Februar

726 F.Supp. 219 (1989) PEOPLE of the State of Illinois ex rel. Neil F. HARTIGAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff, v. Richard B. CHENEY, Secretary of Defense, Defendant. No. 89-3110. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. December 4, 1989. *220 Shawn W. Denney, First Asst. Atty. Gen

605 S.W.2d 640 (1980) Richard H. CHENEY et ux., Appellants, v. James C. PARKS, Jr. et ux. et al., Appellees. No. 17688. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). July 17, 1980. Rehearing Denied August 21, 1980. *641 Gay, De La Garza & Roscoe, John H. Harris, Houston, for appellants. Shirley

763 F.Supp. 431 (1989) McCLELLAN ECOLOGICAL SEEPAGE SITUATION (MESS), Mary Fisher, Charles and Sandy Yarbrough, Plaintiffs, v. Richard B. CHENEY, Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, Defendant. Civ. No. S-86-0475-RAR. United States District Court, E.D. California. August 31, 1989. *432 Michael Axline, John E. Bon

675 A.2d 1322 (1996) Justine and Richard STONE and Beatrice Guyett v. Joyce ERRECART, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Taxes and the State of Vermont. No. 94-295. Supreme Court of Vermont. February 9, 1996. Motion for Reargument Denied March 6, 1996. *1323 David J. Mullett of Cheney, Brock, Saudek & Mullet

672 A.2d 474 (1995) CENTRAL VERMONT HOSPITAL, INC., et al. v. TOWN OF BERLIN. No. 94-591. Supreme Court of Vermont. December 15, 1995. *475 Richard Linton Brock, Sandra E. Levine and James S. Brock of Cheney, Brock, Saudek & Mullett, P.C., Montpelier, for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert Halpert of Paterson & Walke, P

PER CURIAM. The parties having agreed upon a settlement of the above-entitled cause, now, upon the subjoined consent of the attorneys for the respective parties, it is hereby ordered that the above entitled appeal, taken October 27, 1937, from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, entered September 28, 1937, be and the same hereby is dismissed, without costs to

666 A.2d 1170 (1995) Joseph LEMIEUX, Jr., et al. v. TRI-STATE LOTTO COMMISSION. No. 94-590. Supreme Court of Vermont. August 11, 1995. *1171 Colin R. Benjamin of Benjamin & Kazmarski, P.C., Newport, and Richard H. Saudek of Cheney, Brock, Saudek & Mullett, P.C., Montpelier, for plaintiffs-appellants. Jeffrey L. Ame

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. An Ohio jury convicted Richard Joseph of aggravated murder. The jury also convicted Joseph of a single capital specification, which made him eligible for the death penalty, and, after a mitigation hearing, recommended a sentence of death. The trial court accepted this recommendation and imposed the death penalty, w

Per Curiam. The Department of Treasury appeals as of right from an order of the Court of Claims, reversing a decision of the State Board of Tax Appeals and ordering a use tax refund to petitioner. The decision of the Court of Claims judge was based on the following facts, stipulated to by the parties: "1. RCA Service Company (Service) is an autonomous division of RCA Corporation, a Delaware corporatio

624 A.2d 1122 (1992) Mary HODGDON v. MT. MANSFIELD COMPANY, INC. No. 91-346. Supreme Court of Vermont. November 6, 1992. Motions for Reargument and Clarification Denied March 19, 1993. *1124 David J. Mullett of Cheney, Brock & Saudek, P.C., Montpelier, for plaintiff-appellant. David L. Cleary of David