Cases

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about September 13, 2016, which denied the motion of defendants Richard Nagy and Richard Nagy Ltd. (collectively Nagy) to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss plaintiffs’ claim pursuant to General Business Law § 349, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

770 A.2d 43 (2000) Ernest J. NAGY, Plaintiff, v. David BISTRICER, Nachum Stein, Riblet Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Coleman Cable Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 18017. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: November 15, 2000. Decided: November 22, 2000.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge DUNCAN joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether a district court may consider the value of a prisoner’s claim when determining whether to dismiss it as frivolous under the in forma pauperis s

683 A.2d 37 (1996) RIBLET PRODUCTS CORPORATION, David Bistricer, and Nachum Stein, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. Ernest J. NAGY, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 139, 1996. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: September 10, 1996. Decided: September 26, 1996. A. Gilchrist Sparks, III (argued), and David J. Teklits of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tu

Reif v Nagy (2019 NY Slip Op 05504) Reif v Nagy 2019 NY Slip Op 05504 Decided on July 9, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Singh, J., J. Published by New York State Law Repo

Reif v Nagy (2019 NY Slip Op 05504) Reif v Nagy 2019 NY Slip Op 05504 Decided on July 9, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Singh, J. Published by New York State Law Reportin

471 F.Supp. 383 (1979) John D. NAGY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-135. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 1, 1979. William A. Bradford, Jr., Jean S. Moore, Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. John Oliver Birch, Richard A. Mehler, James C. Eastman, Washington, D. C., for defe

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is *2ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 29, 2005, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the action without prejudic

[Cite as Nagy v. Ctr. for Orthopedics, 2014-Ohio-3445.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) JOANN L. NAGY, et al. C.A. No. 13CA010483 Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

Per Curiam. The defendants have appealed1 from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff in an action on a promissory note. The defendants’ claims of error attack the findings of fact of the trial court. The Supreme Court has repeatedly criticized and attempted, apparently in vain, to discourage this misuse of the appellate process. Baker v. Baker, 166 Conn. 476, 4

MERRITT, Circuit Judge. This action arises from the termination of plaintiff Richard Nagy’s insurance agency contract with defendant Farmers Insurance Group. Nagy sought damages from Farmers on the ground that the termination of his contract was illegal under the Michigan Essential Insurance Act, M.C. L.A. § 500.1209. Farmers then joined the Michigan Insurance Commissioner as an involuntary plaintiff, alleging that the Commi

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered July 19, 2005, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs and defendant-respondent companies (The Companies) were competitors in the business of selling apparel to young urban customers. In the summer of 1999, defendant Thomas Nagy, who owned TKN Sales, an

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Plaintiff Sandra Nagy was arrested in January 2010 for trying to enter the White House without authorization. She was then incarcerated at the Correctional Treatment Facility here in Washington, where she claims she was twice beaten by correctional officers. Plaintiff filed suit

452 F.Supp.2d 447 (2006) Johnnie BUNTING, Plaintiff, v. Michael NAGY, Defendant. No. 01 Civ. 5716(RJH)(RLE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 27, 2006. *448 Johnnie Bunting, Alden, NY, pro se. Jennifer L. Johnson, Melinda Chester-Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, New York, NY, for De

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered August 2, 2004, which granted reargument and, upon reargument, granted defendant Nagy’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs and disbursements, the motion denied and plaintiffs’ claims against Nagy reinstated. In or about June 1999, defendant Nagy, who was the sole owner of defendant TKN Sales,

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL A. FIORAVANTI, JR. LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 Date Submitted: February 1, 2023

OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Thomas H. Nagy, is an inmate at Grafton Correctional Institution in Lorain County, Ohio. While an inmate, Nagy tested positive for banned narcotics and was disciplined by prison authorities. Nagy maintained his innocence, and ultimately sued prison officials in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, alleging that the prison's adjudicative process lacked fairness and impartiality and,

730 F.2d 99 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,717J. Donald GOODWIN, Appellant,v.ELKINS & CO., Robert G. Hayden, Richard Sichenzio, andGabriel F. Nagy, Appellees. No. 83-1295. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 13, 1983.Decided March 14, 1984. David M. Doret (argued), Wolf, Block, S

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT PAUL NAGY,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  No. 03-6736 FMC BUTNER, Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

118 P.3d 831 (2005) G.A.S.P., Sierra Club, Oregon Wildlife Federation, Karyn Jones, Susan Jones, Heather Billy, Deborah Burns, Janice H. Lohman, Leandra Phillips, Merle C. Jones, Cindy Beatty, Andrea E. Stine, Dorothy Irish, Mary Bloom, Robert J. Palzer, Janet Nagy, Ladonna King, John Spomer, Christine Clark, Stuart Dick, Gail Horning, David Burns, Pius A. Horning, Karla Stuck, and Melanie Beltane, Appellants, v. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION