Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA25-813 Filed 6 May 2026 Forsyth County, No. 23CVS000172-330 ROBERT VAN CAMP, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD SHAFFNER and SHAFFNER’S AUTO BIKE CUSTOM, Defendants. Appeal by Plaintiff from order entered 28 February 2025 by Judge Troy J. Stafford in Forsyth County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 25 February 2026. Van Camp

C. Johnson, J. ¶1 This attorney discipline case focuses on an ambiguous written fee agreement, the representation provided in the litigation, and the attorney’s conduct during the grievance investigation. Attorney W. Russell Van Camp required a $25,000 initial “retainer” fee to represent a client in an injunction suit, but he did not explain to the client whether it was a nonrefundable flat fee, an hourly fee, or something else.

ROBERTSON, J. The State Board of Tax Commissioners (Board), apparently on its own motion and under statutory authority of Ind. Code *926-1.1-14-10, reviewed the business personal property assessment of Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. (Stokely) in various counties in the State. At issue was whether Stokely could take a statutory tax advantage in the form of a 1/12 valuation instead

394 N.E.2d 209 (1979) STOKELY-VAN CAMP, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE Board of Tax Commissioners, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-1078A275. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. September 12, 1979. On Rehearing October 29, 1979. Richard E. Deer and Rodney A. Nowland, Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer & Boyd, Indianapolis, for plaintiff-appellant.</

257 P.3d 599 (2011) 171 Wash.2d 781 In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST W. Russell VAN CAMP, an Attorney at Law. No. 200,811-9. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued March 8, 2011. Decided June 16, 2011. *601 Dustin Douglass Deissner, Van Camp & Deissner, Spokane, WA, f

Van Ryn v Goland (2020 NY Slip Op 07263) Van Ryn v Goland 2020 NY Slip Op 07263 Decided on December 3, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

759 F.Supp.2d 417 (2010) PURE POWER BOOT CAMP, INC., et. al, Plaintiffs, v. WARRIOR FITNESS BOOT CAMP, LLC, et. al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 4810(THK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 22, 2010. *419 Matthew Henry Sheppe, Sherri Lee Eisenpress, Reiss, Eisenpress and Sheppe LLP, Pasquale A. Razzano, Fitzpatric

918 P.2d 509 (1996) 82 Wash.App. 339 In re the MARRIAGE OF Cheryl C. VAN CAMP, Respondent, and W. Russell Van Camp, Appellant. No. 13773-2-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Two. June 18, 1996. *510 F. Lawrence Taylor, Jr., Spokane, for Appellant. Richard D. McWilliams, Simon R.

813 F.Supp.2d 489 (2011) PURE POWER BOOT CAMP, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. WARRIOR FITNESS BOOT CAMP, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 4810 (THK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 12, 2011. *500 Matthew Henry Sheppe, Sherri Lee Eisenpress, Reiss, Eisenpresss and Sheppe LLP, Pasquale A. Razzano, Fitzpatr

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA PRESBYTERIAN CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTERS, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, Respondent; DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION, Real Party in Interest. S259850 Second Appellate District, Division Six B29

ELLINGTON, Presiding Judge. These consolidated appeals arise from an order in an ongoing visitation dispute between Kellie Van Leuvan, the mother of a minor child (hereinafter, “the mother”), and Connie Carlisle, the child’s maternal grandmother (hereinafter, “the grandmother”). In the order, the Superior Court of Fulton County found the mother to be in willful civil contempt of its temporary visitation order, and it ordered t

Both lawsuits arose out of the same accident and were consolidated for trial. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs-appellants, Richard Nitka and Rosella Nitka, from two judgments, entered February 24, 1949, directing a verdict against the plaintiffs and dismissing the complaints of both plaintiffs. Case No. 77: The issue in this case is whether there is any evidence sufficient to create a jury issue as to whether the defendant, Fabian Van Camp, was negligent in any respect in the opera

07/25/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 16, 2018 RICHARD KELLEY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 41201018 Jill Bartee Ayers, Judge ___________________________________

Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch’s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association’s homepage at http://www.cobar.org. ADVANCE SHEET HEADNOTE June 1, 2020

KELLUM, Judge. Kim Van Pelt appeals the circuit court’s summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., in which he attacked' his capital-murder conviction and his resulting sentence of death. In December 2006, Van Pelt was convicted of capital murder pursuant to § 13A-5-40(a)(7), Ala.Code 1975, for murdering his wife, Sandra Marie Ozment Van Pelt, f

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (James H. Dillon, J.), entered February 2, 2012. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendants Eric Svenson and Marcelle L. Svenson for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is *1132 unanimously

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Who was Peter Knowland? It depends on whom you ask. According to Michelle Van Beneden, who claims to be Mr. Know-land’s sole heir, Mr. Knowland was an American national injured in an horrific Syrian-sponsored terrorist attack on the Schwechat Airport in Vienna, Austria in 1985 for which his estate may recover damages. Ms. Van Beneden cla

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-2039 Filed February 19, 2020 RICHARD J. WERMERSKIRCHEN and CAROL M. WERMERSKIRCHEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILROAD, a/k/a CN, a/k/a CN RAILWAY; CHICAGO CENTRAL & PACIFIC RAILROAD, a/k/a CCP ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY; TIM DORSEY, and JOSH YOKEM, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 399 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISIONS I, III & IV No. CV-13-813 ANDERSON’S TAEKWONDO Opinion Delivered June 18, 2014 CENTER CAMP POSITIVE, INC., and RICHARD ANDERSON APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI APPELLANTS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH