Cases

LEE, Justice, for the Court: Frank E. Rice filed suit in the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Honorable J. C. Stennett, presiding, against Enoch J. Williams for a partnership *734accounting. Williams answered the bill of complaint, filed a cross-bill, and, after the hearing, the lower court awarded Williams the sum of sev

758 N.W.2d 839 (2008) WILLIAMS v. RICE. No. 07-1952. Court of Appeals of Iowa. August 27, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

[Cite as Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Rice, 2012-Ohio-809.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96927 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

[Cite as Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Motley Rice, L.L.C., 2013-Ohio-3737.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99591 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

166 F.3d 350 98 CJ C.A.R. 6336 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00401-COA UNION HILL MISSIONARY BAPTIST APPELLANT CHURCH, INC. v. WILLIE B. CHAMPION, EDDIE CHAMPION, APPELLEES AWIA RICE, DIANE GOODEN, DAISY WILLIAMS, GLORIA SMITH, MARRANDA KING AND SHANNON WILLIAMS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/08/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JA

PER CURIAM ORDER For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 8th day of March, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City entered on January 20, 2016, denying the State’s Motion to Compel a Witness to Testify Pursuant to Section 9-123 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, is reversed; and it is further

Opinion LUI, J. William E. Rice and others 1 sued Attorney Gary P. Downs for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of a written agreement Downs drafted to govern a limited liability corporation he formed with Rice and others. The trial court ordered Rice to arbitrate all of

Opinion by CHIEF JUDGE LOEB 4 1 Defendant, Trevor Ronald Rice, pleaded guilty to a single count of distributing cocaine in the amount of 25 to 450 grams under section 18-18-405(1), (2)(a)(D), and 3(a)(I).1 Ch. 333, see. 10, § 18-18-405, 2018 Colo. Sess. Laws 1909, 1912; Ch. 281, see. 55, § 18-18-405(1)(a), 2012 Colo, Sess. Laws 1622. Rice argued to the sentencing court that extra

RITAW. GRUBER, Chief Judge | [Appellant, Producers Rice Mill, Inc., brings this appeal from an order granting Rice Hull Specialty Products, Inc.’s, motion for summary judgment and dismissing appellant’s petition for declaratory judgment regarding the parties’ rights and obligations pursuant to an indemnity agreement. The circuit court found that the indem

LISA PUPO LENIHAN, United States Magistrate Judge Currently pending before the Court for disposition are the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by First Energy Corp. (ECF No. 58) and NRG Energy (ECF No. 72). In the motions, First Energy Corp. ("FEC") and NRG Energy (collectively, the "Energy Defendants") ask the Court to dismiss all claims in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint against them because they do not own or operate the pow

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Larry Williams appeals the district court’s summary judgment ruling dismissing his claims of wrongful termination and discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was employed as a sheet metal mechanic at Tinker Air F

WILSON, Justice, dissenting. The majority concludes that Mr. Williams failed to provide the jury with legally sufficient evidence to support its award of $50,000 for mental anguish damages in the past resulting from the occurrence in question. Because I believe that a plaintiff who proves he has an objective injury, resulting in a surgery with general anesthesia1 administered, has de

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, is a resident of Riverdale, Maryland, suing twenty individuals for alleged constitutional and statutory violations stemming from his former incarceration at the Rivers Correctional Institution (“RCI”) in Butner, N

LOLLEY, J. | iPro se plaintiff, Michael T. Rice, appeals a judgment of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Parish of Winn,. State of Louisiana, dismissing a writ of mandamus against the coroner of Winn Parish, Dr. Randolph L. Williams. Rice now appeals, and for the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. Facts Litigation between Rice and Dr. Williams began on

On April 30, 2010, John W. Rice (identified in the complaint as "a resident and qualified Republican elector of Lee County who intends to vote in the Republican primary election on June 1, 2010") and Tom Parker (identified in the complaint as "a qualified Republican candidate for re-election to the office of Associate Justice, Alabama Supreme Court, place 3, in the Republican primary election on June 1, 2010") (hereinafter "the petitioners") filed a petition for a writ of prohibition,

609 F.3d 831 (2010) Evelyn D. RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-10589. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 22, 2010. *832 Ronald David Honig, Dallas, TX, Eric Schnaufer, Evanston, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

OPINION The defendant, Kenneth S. Rice, appeals from a Superior Court order denying his motion to correct sentence with respect to his convictions on two counts of first-degree child molestation sexual assault. Mr. Rice's motion to correct was based on a discrepancy between the wording of the judgment of conviction and the transcript of his sentencing hearing. The former sets forth sentences of fifty years for each count, whereas the latter provides t

OPINION HURWITZ, Circuit Judge: The central question in this appeal is whether the district court denied Shawn Rice his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation. Although the district court should have acted more promptly in granting Rice’s request to appear pro se, we find no constitutional violation. We also reject Rice’s argument that the district

86 S.W.3d 329 (2002) Kimberly RICE, et al., Appellants, v. LOUIS A. WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 06-01-00140-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted May 16, 2002. Decided September 13, 2002. *331 James B. Lewis, Scott J. Davenport, Glover, Miller, Lewis & Prebeg, PC, Joh