Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rice v. Landry's, Inc.”
Janelle Nicole Landry v. Theodore Stanley Landrypublic domain
Affirmed in part; Reverse and Remand in part and Opinion Filed September 17, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00575-CV JANELLE NICOLE LANDRY V. THEODORE STANLEY LANDRY On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Bellard v. Mowata Rice Drier, Inc.public domain
GUIDRY, Judge. In this suit, plaintiffs, Louis Bellard, Charles Bellard and Jude Bellard, seek to recover damages in the sum of $96,052.00, from Mowata Rice Drier, Inc. In support of their demand plaintiffs allege that the defendant, acting through its general manager, Paul Frey, mishandled the sale of their 1976 crop of soybeans resulting in a loss to plaintiffs in the sum sued for. The instant suit is consolidated with a c
328 S.W.3d 909 (2010) Juliane Bridget JONES, Appellant, v. LANDRY'S SEAFOOD INN & OYSTER BAR-GALVESTON, INC., Appellee. No. 14-09-00767-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). December 16, 2010. *910 Matthew P. Nickson, Houston, for appellant. Robert Edward Perkins, Keith Christopher Bayko, Richard A. Shee
Sloan v. Mowata Rice Drier, Inc.public domain
GUIDRY, Judge. For the reasons assigned in the companion matter of Louis Bellard v. Mowata Rice Drier, Inc., La.App., 400 So.2d 731, our docket number 8221, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at appellants’ cost. AFFIRMED.
Landry v. PSA of Lafayette, LLCpublic domain
AMY, Judge. liThe plaintiffs filed suit against several treating physicians and a medical equipment provider, seeking damages related to brain damage suffered by their infant daughter. With regard to the medical equipment provider, the plaintiffs primarily asserted that data collected by an apnea monitoring device was negligently lost and/or not delivered to the child’s physicians. They alleged that this negligence resulted
Izzo v. Genesco, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALLISON D. BURROUGHS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Plaintiff Derek Izzo (“Izzo”) alleges that in August 2012, he was terminated as manager of Lids’ Braintree, Massachusetts store for refusing to admit to his supervisor that he had a substance abuse problem. In this action against Genesco Inc. (“Genesco” or “Defendant”) as the owner and operator of Lids, Izzo charges that his termin
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 16, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ________
Crutchfield v. Landrypublic domain
JjMOON LANDRIEU, Judge Pro Tempore. This wrongful death action involves the demise of Samuel Crutchfield, who was struck and killed by an inebriated driver of a pickup truck while the victim was standing on the road next to his tractor-trailer. Civic Center Site Development Company, Inc. d/b/a Holiday Inn Downtown Superdome, GAN National Insurance Company, and Ace America Insurance Company (collectively “
Crowe v. Examworks, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The plaintiffs here are a group.of former and present employees of .the defendants ExamWorks and MES Group, Inc., an en*22tity that was acquired by ExamWorks in 2012. They allege that they were not paid for overtime work in violation of the federal fair labor standards and Massachus
Estherwood Rice Mill, Inc. v. Hope Rice Millpublic domain
TATE, Judge. This is a suit by Estherwood Rice Mill, Inc., the holder of two negotiable warehouse receipts, against Hope Rice Mill, the partnership-warehouseman who had issued the receipts, for the value of certain rices covered by said receipts, but which rices were not delivered by the warehouseman. (Hope’s partners are impleaded as code-fendants.) This suit was consolidated for trial with Orange Rice Milling Company v. Ho
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00001-CV Jane Vorwerk, Appellant v. City of Bartlett and John Landry Pack, Mayor, Appellees FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 19-2155-CC1-4, THE HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
PONDER, Judge. Plaintiff appealed from the judgment dismissing its claim for increased payment on a contract. The issue is the validity of the holding that defendant was not liable beyond the contracted price. We affirm. Plaintiff bid on some electronic equipment for a ship defendant was building on contract. Defendant used this bid in entering into the contract. Se
Kling v. Landrypublic domain
686 N.E.2d 33 (1997) 292 Ill. App.3d 329 226 Ill.Dec. 684 Belen KLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John D. LANDRY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2-97-0059. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. October 10, 1997. *35 T. Patrick Rice, T. Patrick Rice and Associates, P.C., Wheaton, for B
Turner v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.public domain
759 F.Supp.2d 854 (2011) Patrick Joseph TURNER et al. v. MURPHY OIL USA, INC. Civil Action No. 05-4206. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 3, 2011. *855 Mickey P. Landry, David Ryan Cannella, Frank J. Swarr, Landry & Swarr, LLC, Christopher H. Sherwood, The Law Office of Warren A. Forstall, Jr., Gerald Edwa
Rice v. Great Seneca Financial Corp.public domain
(2008) Deborah L. RICE, Plaintiff, v. GREAT SENECA FINANCIAL CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 2:04-cv-00951. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 21, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge. Plaintiff Deborah L. Rice ("Plaintiff) has filed this lawsuit against Defendants Great Seneca Financial Co
Turner v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.public domain
422 F.Supp.2d 676 (2006) Patrick Joseph TURNER, et al. v. MURPHY OIL USA, INC. This Document Relates to All Cases No. CIV.A. 05-4206. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana, Southern Division. March 27, 2006. *677 Mickey P. Landry, David Ryan Cannella, Frank J. Swarr, Landry & Swarr, LLC,
Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.public domain
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: I join the court’s opinion except for its disposition of Landry’s claim under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. In my view, Freytag v. Commissioner, 501 U.S. 868, 111 S.Ct. 2631, 115 L.Ed.2d 764 (1991), cannot be distinguished. The Administrative Law Judge who presided over Landry’s case was as much an “inferio
Turner v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.public domain
ORDER AND REASONS FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. The Court received evidence and argument regarding this motion in a two-day hearing that commenced on January 12, 2006. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification is hereby GRANTED. 1. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND These twenty
Turner v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.public domain
472 F.Supp.2d 830 (2007) Patrick Joseph TURNER, et al. v. MURPHY OIL USA, INC. No. Civ.A. 05-4206. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 30, 2007. Order Denying Amendment February 28, 2007. *831 *832 *833 Mickey P. Landry, D
Rice v. Cummingspublic domain
hPER CURIAM. AMENDED This appeal involves a dispute between two law firms concerning the division of a contingent attorney’s fee resulting from a jury verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff in a wrongful death suit. Both parties have appealed from the judgment of the trial court. We amend and affirm in part and reverse in part and render. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY