Cases

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 12) IN THEIR ENTIRETY: PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #13) ARE OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT CAROLYN W. COL-VIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, REVERSING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS O. RICE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are the Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and the Commissioner’s motion for remand for further administrative proceedings (ECF Nos. 17 and 21). Plaintiff is represented by Cory J. Brandt. Defendant is represented by Lisa Goldoftas. The Court has reviewed the administrative record and the parties’

ORDER JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, District Judge. AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of Plaintiff Monique Reese’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, Defendant’s response thereto, and Reese’s reply, and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, to which no objections have be

675 F.3d 650 (2012) Estate of Nicholas D. RICE, deceased, by: Rick D. RICE and Diane J. Waldrop, co-personal representatives, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, a Missouri corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 09-2804, 10-2389. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued December 3, 2010. Decided March 20, 2012.

852 N.E.2d 591 (2006) Jeff RICE and Tammy Rice, Appellants-Petitioners, v. ALLEN COUNTY PLAN COMMISSION, Appellee-Respondent. No. 02A03-0510-CV-519. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 15, 2006. *592 James A. Federoff, Jason M. Kuchmay, Federoff Law Firm, LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorneys for Appellants.

596 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2009) ESTATE OF Nicholas D. RICE, Deceased, by: Rick D. RICE and Diane J. Waldrop Co-Personal Representatives, Plaintiff v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, a Missouri Corporation, et al., Defendants. Cause No. 3:06-CV-697 RM. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. January 26, 2009. *1212

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Roberta M. Riley brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for *640judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claims for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. The parties have cross-moved for

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2341 September Term, 2014 ______________________________________ RODERICK COLVIN v. STATE OF MARYLAND ______________________________________ Graeff, Friedman, Zarnoch, Robert A. (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ. ______________________________________ Opinion by Zarnoch, J. Di

ROBERT A. ZARNOCH, J. (Retired, Specially Assigned). In this appeal, we consider what constitutes an illegal sentence when a challenge is made to the unanimity of a jury verdict. In 1989, Appellant Roderick Colvin was tried in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City before a jury on numerous charges in connection with the murder of Charles Reese and

DECISION AND ORDER REVERSING THE COMMISSIONER’S DENIAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY BENEFITS AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PAMELA PEPPER, United States District Judge Plaintiff John Anderson seeks judicial review of the final decision of the acting Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), who found that Anderson was not “disabled” within the meaning of the Social Security Act. The Social S

ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 34; Report), entered on February 8, 2016. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Richardson recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 25; Motion) be denied, and that Defendant be di

ORDER R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on review of the Commissioner’s decision denying claimant Rico A. Gonzales’s application for Supplemental Security Income benefits. Jurisdiction is proper under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For the reasons explained below, the Court reverses and remands the Commissioner’s decision. I. Standard of Review.</

ORDER John E. Jones III, United States District Judge AND NOW, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn (Doc. 18), recommending that the Commissioner’s final decision denying Timothy Mc.Gleary’s application for benefits be affirmed and the appeal be denied, and, after an independent review of the record, and noting that the Plaintiff filed object

MEMORANDUM Sylvia H. Rambo, United States District Judge Before the court is a report and recommendation (Doc. 21) filed by the magistrate judge in which he recommends that the appeal by Plaintiff, Jackie Durden, from a decision of the administrate law *432judge be denied. No objections have been filed to the report and recommendation.

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Yvette Miller (“Plaintiff’), on behalf of minor plaintiff J.W., brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the decision by Carolyn W. Colvin (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”)—acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”)—denying J.W.’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). Upon consideratio

ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. [DE 18 & 26]. A hearing on this matter was held in Raleigh, North Carolina on January 30, 2014 at 4:15 p.m. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion is GRANTED, defendant’s motion is DENIED, and, accordingly, the judgment of the Commissione

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, United States Magistrate Judge Edward Rogers, seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner (“Commissioner”) of the Social Security Administration (“Agency”) denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”). Mr. Rogers asks the court to reverse and remand the Commissioner’s decision.</

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARY M. ROWLAND, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Denise Simon-Leveque filed this action seeking reversal of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (Act). 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 423 et seq.- The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United S

ORDER Mary Olsen is 44 years old and suffers from degenerative disc disease and carpal tunnel syndrome. The Social Security Administration denied her application for disability insurance benefits, and the district court upheld that determination. Olsen appeals, challenging the administrative law judge’s conclusions that she exaggerated the intensity and persistence of her symptoms and that as of her date last insured, she had the resi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IAIN D. JOHNSTON, United States Magistrate Judge. Edward Giebudowski (hereinafter, “Claimant”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking reversal or remand of the decision by Respondent, Carolyn W. Colvin,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of