Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ricardo A Ramirez”
RICARDO A. RAMIREZ vs STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED RICARDO A. RAMIREZ, Appellant, Case No. 5D22-459 v. LT Case No. 2012-000211-CFAWS STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ______
Ricardo Ramirez v. State of Rhode Islandpublic domain
OPINION Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court. This case came before the Supreme Court on April 2, 2014, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. Ricardo Ramirez (Ramirez or applicant), appeals from a Superior Court judgment denying his application for postconviction
Ricardo Ramirez A/K/A Paul Ramirez v. Statepublic domain
Nos. 04-98-00898-CR, 04-98-00924-CR, 04-98-00925-CR, 04-98-00926-CR Paul RAMIREZ a/k/a Ricardo Ramirez, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
State v. Ramirezpublic domain
936 A.2d 1254 (2007) STATE v. Ricardo RAMIREZ. No. 2003-27-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. December 17, 2007. *1257 George J. West, Esq., Providence, for Plaintiff. Jane M. McSoley, Esq., Providence, for Defendant. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, SUTTELL, and ROBINSON, JJ. OPINION
Ramirez v. Sygutowskapublic domain
The Family Court correctly determined that it lacked exclusive, continuing jurisdiction pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 76-a (1), even though the father lived in New York, because the parties’ child had not maintained a significant connection with New York, and substantial evidence was no longer available in New York concerning the child’s “care, protection, training, and personal relationships” (Domestic Relations Law § 76-a [1] [a]; see Matter
Ramirez v. City of Worcesterpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 47) HILLMAN, D.J. Plaintiff Ricardo Ramirez filed the present action after he sustained injuries including a fractured jaw and broken teeth during his arrest by defendants Worcester Police Detectives Larry Williams and Dana Randall. Ramirez alleges violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Count I), False Arrest (Count III), Malicious
Ricardo Ramirez v. Statepublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-18-00338-CR RICARDO RAMIREZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015-2360-C1
Ramirez v. City of Worcesterpublic domain
ORDER TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Ricardo Ramirez asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, and Massachusetts common law against two Worcester police officers, the City of Worcester, the Worcester Police Chief, and the former Worcester City Manager. The claims arise out of an alleged beating and false arrest of Plaintiff by Worcester police det
Ricardo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commissionpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Miller v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 690 So.2d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).
Ramirez, Ricardopublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0644-12 RICARD
Ricardo Ramirez v. the State of Texaspublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-22-00421-CR RICARDO RAMIREZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 20-01405-CRF-85
Ricardo Silva v. Diana Lizeth Ramirez-Toscanopublic domain
Opinion issued December 28, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00701-CV ——————————— R.S., Appellant V.
Ricardo Ramirez v. Statepublic domain
Opinion filed August 21, 2015 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-13-00266-CR __________ RICARDO RAMIREZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law
Ramirez, Ricardopublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1381-08 RICARDO RAMIREZ, Appella
Ramirez, Ricardo Moreno Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-79,513-01 EX PARTE RICARDO MORENO RAMIREZ, JR., Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR-2944-12-A IN THE 92ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HIDALGO COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 1
People v. Ramirezpublic domain
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered November 13, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 18 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the DNA databank fee, and otherwise affirmed. The court properly denied defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea after a suitable inquiry in which the
Ramirez, Ricardo Moreno Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-79,513-01
People v. Ramirezpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered June 14, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (two counts), after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a heari
Ricardo G. Ramirez v. Statepublic domain
02-12-011-CR
Ricardo G. Ramirez v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00011-CR RICARDO G. RAMIREZ APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 10 OF TARRANT COUNTY