Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rhonda Louise Martin”
OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Petitioners Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”) and Michigan Manufacturers Association (“Manufacturers”) appeal the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) decision under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q, disapproving revisions to a state implementation plan (“SIP”) submitted by the State of Michigan. The question presented for review is whe
United States v. Millerpublic domain
588 F.3d 897 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garland D. MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-31168. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. November 20, 2009. *900 Josette Louise Cassiere (argued) and C. Mignonne Griffing, Asst. U.S. Attys., Shreveport, LA, for U.S. Ansel Martin Stroud (argued
Ashley v. City of Lexingtonpublic domain
718 S.E.2d 377 (2011) Ralph ASHLEY, Jean Ashley, Alexander Augoustides, Carolyn Auman, Luther T. Barber, Sylvia Barber, D.H. Beam, Jay Belk, Pam Belk, Anthony J. Bolo, Jr., Marion J. Bonnom, Keith Bost, Sherry Bost, Ricky Boyd, Michael P. Bralkowski, Rhonda W. Bralkowski, Jim Buchanan, Betsy Buchanan, Peggy Burchett, Jerry Burkhart, Jeri Burkhart, Bobby Byerly, Patsy Byerly, Jim Cameron, Betsy Cameron, Brad Cates, Jodi Cates, Cary Cooper, Amanda Cooper,
in Re Eduardo Del Pinopublic domain
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
DATE: 08/05/2014 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:36:36 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 12312013 GROUP 3, REINST FEE ASSESSED ______________________________________________________
Heriot v. Byrnepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTIN C. ASHMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs, Drew Heriot (“Heriot”) and Drew Pictures Pty Ltd. (“Drew Pictures”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), sued defendants Rhonda Byrne, The Secret LLC (a/k/a TS Holdings LLC), Prime Time U.S. Inc., TS Production Holdings LLC, TS Production LLC, and TS Merchandising Ltd. (collectively “Defendants”). Currently before t
In re: Tax Appeal of Vreugdenhil and Nakayamapublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 25-MAR-2026 08:51 AM Dkt. 49 SO
Ashley v. City of Lexingtonpublic domain
704 S.E.2d 529 (2011) Ralph ASHLEY, Jean Ashley, Alexander Augoustides, Carolyn Auman, Luther T. Barber, Sylvia Barber, D.H. Beam, Jay Belk, Pam Belk, Anthony J. Bolo, Jr., Marion J. Bonnom, Keith Bost, Sherry Bost, Ricky Boyd, Michael P. Bralkowski, Rhonda W. Bralkowski, Jim Buchanan, Betsy Buchanan, Peggy Burchett, Jerry Burkhart, Jeri Burkhart, Bobby Byerly, Patsy Byerly, Jim Cameron, Betsy Cameron, Brad Cates, Jodi Cates, Cory Cooper, Amanda Cooper,
MI Mfg Assoc v. Brownerpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 MI Dep’t of Environmental Nos. 98-3399/3400 Quality, et al. v. Browner, et al. ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2000 FED App. 0361P (6th Cir.) File Name: 00a0361p.06 Before: SILER and CLA
230 F.3d 181 (6th Cir. 2000) Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (98-3399); Michigan Manufacturers Association (98-3400), Petitioners,v.Carol Browner, EPA Administrator; United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. Nos. 98-3399, 98-3400 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Argued: June 22, 2000Decided and Filed: August 24,
19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY
State v. Elkinspublic domain
OPINION The defendant, Darryl Lee Elkins, was tried and convicted of child rape and attempted child rape in the Criminal Court for Sullivan County. The Court of Criminal Appeals unanimously affirmed his child rape conviction and affirmed by majority his attempted child rape Conviction. We granted this appeal to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to support both convictions. After examining the facts and the law relevant to
ORDER This matter originated in this Court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “Commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (A)(1)(b) and Div. (A)(2)(d). The Commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1996-1997 repor
Opinion issued October 30, 2003 In The Court of Appeals For The</
Dixon v. Hardeypublic domain
The plaintiffs, Patricia Dixon and Louise Thompson, co-administratrixes of the estate of Anita Thompson, appeal from a judgment against them entered after a jury *Page 5 returned a verdict for the defendant, Kim A. Hardey, M.D., in an action alleging medical malpractice. We reverse. On July 6, 1987, Anita Thompson entered Southeast Alabama Medical Center ("Hospital") for the treatment of uterine fibroid tumors. The following day, Dr. Hardey
State of Tennessee v. Darryl Lee Elkinspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 18, 2001 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DARRYL LEE ELKINS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. S41,530 R. Jerry Beck, Judge No. E2001-01245-CCA-R3-CD March 27, 2002 Defendant, Darryl Lee Elkins,
Bartlett v. Baasiripublic domain
21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law 468-a
Teague v. Johnson & Johnsonpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;
Blackwell v. City of Reidsvillepublic domain
EAGLES, Chief Judge. We first consider whether the property descriptions in the annexation ordinances are metes and bounds descriptions where the property descriptions do not include courses and distances but make reference to “lots” that are not identified in the property descriptions. Petitioners argue that the annexation statute expressly requires that in the annexation ordinance “[t]he external boundarie