Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rhonda A. Weber”
Rhonda Patrice Goodman-Delaney v. Marilynn Granthampublic domain
OPINION Martha Hill Jamison, Justice In this forcible detainer case, appellant Rhonda Patrice Goodman-Delaney challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence in support of the county court at law’s judgment against her for rent and attorney’s fees on the basis that she did not have a landlord-tenant relationship with appellee, Marilynn Grantham.- • We ■
Weber v. Santospublic domain
PER CURIAM: Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action asserting civil rights and state law claims for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Weber’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Weber has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Ac
State v. Weberpublic domain
¶1 A jury convicted Charles Weber of second degree attempted murder and first degree assault, both while armed with a firearm, and first degree unlawful possession of a firearm. The trial court vacated the assault conviction based on double jeopardy. Weber argues for reversal based on use of juvenile adjudications in sentencing without findings by the jury, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, violation of Fourth Amendment rights,
In re the Personal Restraint of Weberpublic domain
C. Johnson, J. ¶1 This case involves a time-barred personal restraint petition (PRP) and requires the court to determine whether the petitioner has made a prima facie showing of a gateway actual innocence claim. If the petitioner presents sufficient evidence to support such a claim, the time limit on the PRP would be equitably tolled to permit consideration of the merits of the constitutional claim. This case also requires the co
Florida Peninsula Insurance Company v. Wagnerpublic domain
LUCAS, Judge. Florida Peninsula Insurance Company (Florida Peninsula) appeals a final judgment that construed an insurance policy provision in favor of Rhonda and Mark Wagner, as well as the court’s award of attorney’s fees against it following a jury’s verdict on damages. We find merit in Florida Peninsula’s argument that the circuit court erroneously applied a multiplier to the
State v. Weberpublic domain
112 P.3d 1287 (2005) STATE of Washington, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Charles Walter WEBER, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. No. 52911-1-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. June 6, 2005. *1288 David L. Donnan, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, Charles Walter Weber, Washington State Penitentiary, Walla Walla, Counsel
Rhonda Otting v. J.C. Penney Co.public domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 99-2679/2680 ___________ Rhonda Otting, * * Appellant/Cross-Appellee, * * Appeals from the United States v. * Dist
Moore v. Medowspublic domain
674 F.Supp.2d 1366 (2009) Anna C. MOORE, a minor child, by and through her mother and natural guardian Pamela MOORE, Plaintiff, v. M.D. Rhonda MEDOWS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Community Health, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:07-CV-631-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. December 9, 2009.
in the Interest of A.M. and B.M., Childrenpublic domain
May 05, 2006 Mr. Shawn Casey Law Office of Shawn Casey 5433 Westheimer, Suite 920 Houston, TX 77056-5375 Mr. George W. Dana Attorney at Law 11550 Fuqua, Suite 340 Houston, TX 77034 Ms. Rhonda Amkraut Pressley Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division P. O. Box 12017 (MC 038-1) Austin, TX 78711-2017 RE: Case Number: 03-0509 Court of Appeals Number: 13-00-00649-CV Trial Court Number: 8139986 Style: IN THE INTEREST OF A.M. AND B.M., CHILDREN Dear Counsel:
Colvin v. Lathanpublic domain
GRIFFIN, Chief Judge. We find no error in the child support award; however, this court has consistently held that an order requiring the payment of medical expenses must specify a dollar amount or the total financial exposure of the payor. McDaniel v. McDaniel, 653 So.2d 1076, 1078 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Additionally, this court has held that a payor need only be responsible for those expenses which are “reasonable
Rhonda Otting, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. J. C. Penney Company, Appellee/cross-Appellantpublic domain
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. A jury awarded Rhonda Otting compensatory and punitive damages on her discrimination claim against J.C. Penney pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (1994). Following the jury’s verdict, J.C. Penney moved for judgment as a matter of law (JAML), or in the alternative, for a new trial, pursuant to Rules 50 and 59 o
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00817-CV Caroline Miller, Catherine Austin, Dewey T. Bell, Kimberly Bell, Mike Bellows, Rhonda Bellows, Curtis Dwayne Breaux, Lisa Gayle Breaux, Thomas J. Canton, Vera Canton, Warren J. Clark, Patricia K. Clark, Barbara Garry, Donna Ann Green, Clifford Guidry, Shirley Guidry, Bradley K. Kloefkorn, Patricia C. Kloefkorn, Jerald Paul LeBlanc, Janet Elizabeth LeBla
United States v. Jonespublic domain
Michael F. Urbanski, United States District Judge This matter comes before the court on a motion for a judgment of acquittal under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29. At the close of the government's evidence at trial, defendants Michael Dove and Terrance Brown moved the court for acquittal of Counts Three through Eight of the indictment on the basis of improper venue. ECF Nos. 849, 852.1 For the reas
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge. Rhonda Wilson filed suit against her employer, Belmont Homes, Inc. (“Belmont”), claiming that it discharged her because of her sex. After a bench trial, the district court denied her claim. Wilson appeals, arguing that she was entitled to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment or, alternatively, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (the “Act”)
Woolf v. Evanspublic domain
JUSTICE GRAY delivered the Opinion of the Court. Rhonda Jo Woolf (Rhonda) appeals from an order of the Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Sheridan County, holding her in contempt. The court believed that Rhonda fabricated an incident of child sexual abuse to deprive her former husband, Joseph Douglas Evans (Jose
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00378-CV DAVID J. KANTNER AND WIFE, APPELLANTS SHERI K. KANTNER, JON D. MATHE, DAVID MOORE, AND WIFE, SYLVIA MOORE, AND MICHAEL MORRIS AND WIFE, KIM MORRIS V. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY APPELLEES CORPORATION AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC
02-11-378--390-CV_COR
Walker v. McCarthypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge . The plaintiff, James Walker, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action against Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA” or “the agency”), where the plaintiff is employed as a Senior Scientist. The plaintiff claims that h
Smith v. Statepublic domain
RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice 11 Todd Aaron Smith appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition for postconviction relief. Smith was convicted for the rape of a young girl. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in three respects: (1) for failing to object to multiple instances of inadmissible hearsay and uncharged allegations of sexual
Kaplan v. Prolife Action League of Greensboropublic domain
493 S.E.2d 416 (1997) Richard D. KAPLAN, M.D., Marguerite Kaplan, Jacob M. Kaplan, and David S. Kaplan v. PROLIFE ACTION LEAGUE OF GREENSBORO, William H. Winfield, Jr., Linda Winfield, Ronald W. Benfield, Scott Allred, Stephen Michael Beall, Seth Hinshaw, Albert Hodges, Jeffrey Alexander Kendall, Father Conrad Kimbrough, *417 Julian McClamroch, Bernard McHale, Duane Richardson, Candido Rosario, a/k/a Candido R