Cases

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI WALLER, Chief Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In 2004, Marvin Rhoda and Edith Weathers were involved in an automobile collision in Southaven, Mississippi. Rhoda sued Weathers, alleging negligence, and the jury returned a verdict for Weathers. The Court of Appeals affirmed the jury’s verdict, but reversed and remanded the trial court’s refusal to assess sanctio

The State appeals the district court’s decisions in these consolidated interlocutory appeals suppressing defendants’ breath test results. The court ruled that under 23 VS.A. § 1203a-sup-pression was required where the officer failed to inform a DUI suspect that an independent chemical test would be paid for by the defender general if not paid for by the suspect. We reverse. Defendants Heath Wright, Randall Longway, Erin Rutkowski, Raymond

Nationstar Mtge., LLC v Wright (2019 NY Slip Op 06608) Nationstar Mtge., LLC v Wright 2019 NY Slip Op 06608 Decided on September 18, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B

671 N.W.2d 197 (2003) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Daniel James BERGERSON, Appellant. No. A03-112. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. October 28, 2003. *200 Charles A. Ramsay, Rebecca Rhoda Fisher, Ramsay, DeVore, Olson, P.A., Roseville, MN, for appellant. Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Robert M.A. Johns

659 N.W.2d 791 (2003) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Daniel James BERGERSON, Appellant. No. C2-02-932. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 15, 2003. *793 Charles A. Ramsay, Rebecca Rhoda Fisher, Ramsay, DeVore, & Olson, P.A., Roseville, for appellant. Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Amy J. Woodworth, Assistant Attor

MEMORANDUM *** Isaías Gutierrez Benavides, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders denying his motion to reopen, and dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reo

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of Lafayette County. The court sustained a demurrer to appellant's petition and, upon refusing to plead further, judgment went against him. The petition is too long to be copied, so we summarize the essential allegations. Zack A. Wright died a resident of Lafayette County, Missouri, and the respondent (defendant) was appointed administratrix of his estate in that county. He owned some property in Johnson County, Kansas, and the appellant (plaint

12 F.Supp.2d 662 (1998) Daniel V. GREEN, Plaintiff, v. AMERITECH CORP. and Ameritech Service, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-40535. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 6, 1998. Timothy G. Hagan, Rudy J. Huizenga, Donnelly, Huizenga, Detroit, MI, for Daniel *663 V. Green, Rhoda A. Giebel,

The evidence presented to the Grand Jury was sufficient, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People, to establish each element of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree. Rafael Martell, security manager for the Century 21 Department Store at 12 Cortland Street in Manhattan, testified that on the afternoon of January 28, 1985, he observed two women, one in a black hat the other in a red hat, who were bumping into customers in the shoe de

381 F.Supp.2d 738 (2005) MPOWER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edward C. HURLEY, et al., Defendants, and MCI, INC., Plaintiff, v. Illinois Commerce Commission, et al., Defendants. No. 04 C 6909, No 04 C 7402. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 29, 2005. *739

Plaintiff sued defendant alleging misrepresentation and breach of agreement. The case was tried before the trial judge sitting without a jury. After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. The only issue presented is whether the trial court's judgment is supported by the evidence. The facts of the case are basically undisputed. In December 1975 plaintiff contacted defendant regarding the repair of her residential swimming

Nassau Prop. Invs., LLC v Goffe (2023 NY Slip Op 00429) Nassau Prop. Invs., LLC v Goffe 2023 NY Slip Op 00429 Decided on February 1, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud

932 A.2d 549 (2007) 2007 ME 130 STATE of Maine v. William J. ESTABROOK. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs: May 17, 2007. Decided: September 13, 2007. Neal T. Adams, District Attorney, Suzanne N. Russell, Asst. Dist. Atty., Caribou, for State. Richard L. Rhoda, Houlton, for defendant. Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and

Notaro v Performance Team (2018 NY Slip Op 03692) Notaro v Performance Team 2018 NY Slip Op 03692 Decided on May 23, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t

122 Ga. App. 214 (1970) 176 S.E.2d 715 WRIGHT, Administratrix v. DILBECK et al. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. DILBECK et al. 45010, 45020. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued January 9, 1970. Decided July 2, 1970. Rehearing Denied July 21, 1970. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Frank Love, Jr.

[Cite as Myers v. Bedway Land, 2017-Ohio-1256.] STATE OF OHIO, HARRISON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ROBERT B. MYERS, et al., ) CASE NO. 14 HA 0012 ) PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, ) ) VS.

[Cite as Myers v. Bedway Land, 2017-Ohio-1255.] STATE OF OHIO, HARRISON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ROBERT B. MYERS, et al., ) CASE NO. 14 HA 0011 ) PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, ) ) VS.

PER CURIAM. The posture of this appeal is unusual. Appellants move to dismiss their own appeal on the ground the district court did not have the power under Rule 54(b), Fed.R. Civ.P., to certify as final the judgment from which appeal was taken. In the alternative they move for a stay of appellate proceedings pending a final decisio

Dissenting Opinion bv Packed, J.: Is there an accidental injury when an escaping felon is shot? That is the question which the court below answered in the negative and therefore granted summary judgment to the appellee. The appellant sought recovery of $10,935 on a hospital expense policy and a major medical expense policy, both originally issued in 1962. The appellant was the insured under

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered March 13, 2013. The order, among other things, denied the motion of plaintiff for sum*1328mary judgment dismissing defendant’s counterclaims and granted the cross motion of defendant for leave to serve a second amended answer and counterclaims. It is hereby ordered that the order so ap